Semiotics of Drinking in the Context of Post-metaphysical Transformations of Modern Philosophy

 
PIIS023620070008948-9-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070008948-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: Ulyanovsk State Technical University
Address: Russian Federation, Ulyanovsk
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 32 Issue №3
Pages152-166
Abstract

The objective of this research is to develop the philosophical aspects of a semiotic analysis of the phenomena of drunkenness and intoxication. The consumption of alcoholic beverages has been a significant aspect of a person's cultural life throughout almost all of its history. Alcohol occupies such a significant place in human existence that intoxication can be safely attributed to the number of existentials or modes of human existence. Accordingly, the consumption of alcoholic beverages and the state of intoxication are inevitably endowed in culture with symbolic functions; a whole semiotic space or alcoholic discourse is formed with its own boundaries, center and periphery, a set of significant oppositions, a system of meaning. This semiotic space does not exist in isolation, but is inscribed in the semiosphere as such, is in correlation with the semiotic spaces of certain cultures, eras, religious and philosophical worldviews. The analysis of these structures, meanings and oppositions is the task of drunkenness semiotics. The study may have a literary orientation and be devoted to identifying the semiotic aspects of drunkenness in the space of a literary text and the history of fiction. Cultural-historical analysis is focused on the study of the symbolic functions of drunkenness in the context of cultural and historical eras and the life of individual peoples. Finally, philosophical research using semiotics as a methodological attitude should focus primarily on the explication of metaphysical and post-metaphysical issues in alcoholic discourse.

 

Keywordssemiotics, drunkenness, marginal anthropology, post-metaphysical philosophy, M.M. Bakhtin, Y.M. Lotman, F. Nietzsche
AcknowledgmentThe publication was prepared as part of the scientific project supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research No. 19-011-00910 “Marginal Phenomena of Human Being (Anthropology ad Marginem)”.
Received29.06.2021
Publication date29.06.2021
Number of characters20950
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 780

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. 1. Avtonomova N.S. Otkrytaya struktura: Yakobson-Bahtin-Lotman-Gasparov [Open structure: Yakobson-Bakhtin-Lotman-Gasparov]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2009.

2. Shelkovnikov A.Y. Filosofiya semiotiki [Philosophy of semiotics]. Moscow: APKiPPRO Publ., 2006.

3. Konev V.A. Smysl kul'tury [The meaning of culture]. Samara: Samara University Publ., 2016.

4. Dyomin I.V. Semiotika istorii i germenevtika istoricheskogo opyta [Semiotics of history and hermeneutics of historical experience]. Samara: Samarskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya, 2017.

5. Nesterov A.Y. Semioticheskaya skhema poznaniya i kommunikacii [Semiotic scheme of cognition and communication]. Samara: Samarskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya, 2008.

6. Faritov V.T. Fenomeny granicy i transgressii v issledovaniyah Yu.M. Lotmana: ontologicheskie osnovaniya semioticheskoj filosofii [Border and transgression phenomenons in the studies of Y.M. Lotman: ontological foundations of semiotic philosophy]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. N 434. S. 77‒82. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/434/9

7. Lotman Y.M. V shkole poeticheskogo slova: Pushkin, Lermontov, Gogol' [At the school of the poetic word: Pushkin, Lermontov, Gogol]. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka Publ., 2015.

8. Dostoevsky F.M. Dnevnik. Stat'i. Zapisnye knizhki: v 3 t. T. 3. 1877‒1881 gg. [Diary. Articles. Notebooks: In 3 volumes. T. 3. 1877‒1881]. Moscow: Zaharov Publ., 2005.

9. Bakhtin M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul'tura srednevekov'ya i Renessansa [Creativity Francois Rabelais and the folk culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 2015.

10. Bataille G. Proklyataya chast'. Sakral'naya sociologiya [The damned part. Sacred Sociology]. Moscow: Ladomir Publ, 2006.

11. Trubetskoy E.N. Smysl zhizni [Meaning of life]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2010.

12. Faritov V.T. Elementy narodno-smekhovoj kul'tury v ꞌꞌTak govoril Zaratustraꞌꞌ F. Nicshe (Nicshe i Bahtin) ["Elements of folk-laughter culture in "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" by F. Nietzsche (Nietzsche and Bakhtin)"]. Litera. 2016. N 3. S.60‒74. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8698.2016.3.19305.

13. Nietzsche F. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 13 t. T. 6: Sumerki idolov. Antihrist. Ecce homo. Dionisovy difiramby. Nietzsche contra Wagner [Complete Works: In 13 volumes. Vol. 6: Twilight of Idols. Antichrist. Ecce homo. Dionysian praises. Nietzsche contra Wagner]. Moscow: Cultural Revolution Publ., 2009.

14. Nietzsche F. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 13 t. T. 9: Chernoviki i nabroski 1880‒1882 gg. [Complete Works: In 13 volumes. Vol. 9: Drafts and sketches, 1880‒1882]. Moscow: Cultural Revolution Publ., 2013.

15. Nietzsche F. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 13 t. T. 1/1: Rozhdenie tragedii. Iz naslediya 1869‒1873 godov [Complete Works: In 13 volumes. T. 1/1: The birth of a tragedy. From the legacy of 1869‒1873]. Moscow: Cultural Revolution Publ., 2012.

16. Ivanov V.I. Nicshe i Dionis [Nietzsche and Dionysus]. Nietzsche: pro et contra / Ed. by. Y.V. Sineokaya. Saint Petersburg: RHGI Publ., 2001. S. 794‒805.

17. Nietzsche F. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 13 t. T. 11: Chernoviki i nabroski 1884‒1885 gg. [Complete Works: In 13 volumes. Vol. 11: Drafts and sketches for 1884‒1885]. Moscow: Cultural Revolution Publ., 2012.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up