The Philosophical Subject in the Max Frisch’s Trilogy: No Country for The Self

Occupation: PhD student of the Faculty of Humanities, School of Philosophy
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: 20 Myasnitskaya St., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 31 Issue №1

Pages

23-44

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of the subject — the crucial task here consists in making compatible the idea of an ineffable, transcendental I with the fact of the empirical subject (in its embodiment, character, etc.). In order to retain the transcendental I, it always had to sacrifice its inseparable connection with the empirical I. Another strategy would be to sacrifice the I — but in that case, the philosophical subject ends up a combination of psychophysical mechanisms. An attempt to overcome these extremes by way of revising the methodological assumptions was undertaken in the 20th century within the framework of narrative ontologies. Swiss writer Max Frisch is close to this tradition. Remarkably, his novels (“Homo Faber”, “A Wilderness of Mirrors” and “I'm Not Stiller”) may offer a key to resolving this central philosophical mystery. It would not, however, be a properly philosophical reading or philosophical interpretation if one were simply to re-read the trilogy. I will approach it through the concept of the “Mask,” grasped as the way of being of the philosophical subject. The mask hides the ineffable I underneath it — but its form also allows to account for the empirical subject, without thereby falling into contradiction: the internal I shapes the external relief of the mask, whereas this external side, in its immediate contact with the world, in turn affects the I. In other words, the mask retains the transcendental I, but also leaves intact the “living” subject, with all the intricacies of its internal, spiritual life.

Keywords

subject, the problem of the Self, Max Frisch, Mask, reflection

Received

21.03.2020

Publication date

30.03.2020

Number of characters

42728

Cite

GOST	Vinkelman A. The Philosophical Subject in the Max Frisch’s Trilogy: No Country for The Self // Chelovek – 2020. – V. 31. – Issue №1 C. 23-44 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070008742-3-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070008742-3
MLA	Vinkelman, Anna M "The Philosophical Subject in the Max Frisch’s Trilogy: No Country for The Self." Chelovek 31.1 (2020):23-44. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070008742-3
APA	Vinkelman A. (2020). The Philosophical Subject in the Max Frisch’s Trilogy: No Country for The Self. Chelovek 31(1), pp.23-44 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070008742-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1122

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Wittgenstein L. Logiko-filosofskii traktat [Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]. Wittgenstein L. Filosofskiye raboty: v 2 ch. [Philosophical Works: in 2 Pt]. Pt 1, trans. from Germ. by M.S. Kozlova and Yu.A. Aseyev; compil., notes by M.S. Kozlova. Moscow: Gnozis Publ., 1994.

2. Danko S. Logika, smysl i cennost' v performativnom izmerenii “Logiko-filosofskogo traktata” L. Vitgenshtejna [Logic, Meaning and Value in the Performative Dimension of L. Wittgenstein's “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus”]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2017. Vol. 52, N 2. P. 71–86.

3. Deskartes R. Metafizicheskie razmyshleniya [Meditations on First Philosophy], trans. from Fr. and Lat. by V. Sokolov. Deskartes R. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Collected Works]. Moscow; Leningrad: Gospolisdat Publ., 1950.

4. Kant I. Kritika tschistogo razuma [Critique of Pure Reason], trans. from Germ. by N. Losskii. Kant I. Sobranie sochinenii: v 8 t. [Collected Works: in 8 vol.] Vol. 3. Moscow: CHORO Publ., 1994.

5. Kostomarov A. Maska kak vozmozhnost' lica [The Mask as the Ability of a Person]. Samara: Samarа Univ. Publ., 2008.

6. Ricœur P. Ya-sam kak drugoi [Oneself as Another], trans. from Fr. by B. Skuratov. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoi literatury Publ., 2008.

7. Shtain O. Maska kak forma identichnosti [The Mask as the Identity Form]. St. Petersburg: RHGA Publ., 2013.

8. Hume D. Traktat o chelovecheskoi prirode [A Treatise of Human Nature], trans. from Eng. by S. Tsereteli, V. Vasil'eva, V. Shvyreva. Hume D. Sobranize sochineniy: v 2 t. [Collected Works: in 2 vol.] Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1996.

9. Cunliffe WG. Existentialist Elements in Frisch's Works. Monatshefte. 1970. Vol. 62, N 2. P. 113–122.

10. Frisch M. Homo faber. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2014.

11. Frisch M. Mein Name sei Gantenbein. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 1975.

12. Frisch M. Stiller. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1973.

13. Frisch M. Tagebuch 1946–1949. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1963.

14. Hüseyin A. Aufbau und Form in Frischs Roman Mein Name sei Gantenbein. Ç.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010. Vol. 38. P. 35–45.

15. Kieran D. Existenziale Themen bei Max Frisch: Die Existenzialphilosophie Martin Heideggers in den Romanen “Stiller”, “Homo faber” und “Mein Name sei Gantenbein”. Berlin [u.a.]: de Gruyter, 1978.

16. Leinfellner W. Is Wittgenstein a Transcendental Philosopher? (Wittgenstein and Kant). Revista Portuguesa De Filosofia. 1982. Vol. 38, N 1. P. 13–27.

17. Lüthi H.J. Max Frisch. Du sollst dir kein Bildnis machen. München: Francke Verlag, 1981.

18. Pachmuss T. Dostoyevsky and Max Frisch: Identity in the Modern World. New Zealand Slavonic Journal. 1982. P. 89–101.

19. Watzka H. Did Wittgenstein Ever Take the Linguistic Turn? Revista Portuguesa De Filosofia. 2002. Vol. 58, N 3. P. 549–568.

20. Weiche R. Die Paradoxie der Maske. Geschichte einer Form. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2004.