Constructivism in epistemology and in human sciences

 
PIIS023620070003025-4-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070003025-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Chief Research Fellow
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow 109240, Russian Federation
Occupation: Leading Research Fellow
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow 109240, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 30 Issue №1
Pages102-124
AbstractThe projective constructivism as a cultural attitude and the constructivism in epistemology are discussed. The radical constructivism as a project of substituting natural processes with artificial ones is analyzed. The authors study the constructivist conception of knowledge in general, the constructivist philosophy of scientific knowledge in particular. The following thesis is substantiated: a complete control by the human being over the world is impossible, and realizing of the radical constructivism as life and cultural attitude is not a triumph of human freedom, but rather its loss. Epistemological constructivism is not a true interpretation of cognition and cannot be a fruitful strategy in science. The authors defend the position of constructive realism as a life, cultural and cognitive attitude.
Keywordsconstructivism, realism, constructive realism, social constructionism, virtual reality, post-human being, epistemology, philosophy of science
Publication date29.03.2019
Number of characters50236
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 6, views: 2252

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gibson J.J. Ekologicheskiy podhod k zritel’nomu vospriyatiyu [The Ecological Approach To Visual Perception]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1988.

2. Kasavin I.T. Konstruktivizm [Constructivism]. Entsiclopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Epistemology & Philosophy of Science]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2009. P. 373–377.

3. Kuhn Th. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1975.

4. Lektorskii V.A. Vozmozhno li post-chelovecheskoe budushchee? [Is Post-Human Future Possible?]. Filosofiya, poznanie, kul’tura [The Philosophy, The Cognition, The Culture]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2012. P. 119–124.

5. Lektorskii V.A. Realizm, anti-realizm, konstruktivizm i konstruktivnyy realizm v sovremennoy epistemologii i nauke [Realism, Anti-realism, Constructivism and Constructive Realism in Contemporary Epistemology and Science]. Konstruktivistskiy podhod v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke [Constructivist Approach in the Epistemology and Human Studies]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2009. P. 5–40.

6. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. Struktura i istoricheskaya evolyutsiya [Theoretical Knowledge: its Structure and Historical Evolution]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2000.

7. Stepin V.S. Tsivilizatsiya i kul’tura [Civilisation and Culture]. St. Petersburg: SPbGUP, 2011.

8. Trufanova E.O. Sub’’ekt i poznanie v mire sotsial’nykh konstruktsiy [A Knower in the Universe of Social Constructions]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2018.

9. Ulanovskiy A.M. Konstruktivistskaya paradigma v gumanitarnykh naukakh [Constructivist paradigm in the humanities]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology & Philosophy of Science]. 2006. N 4. P. 129–141.

10. Feyerabend P. Protiv metoda: Ocherk anarhicheskoy teorii poznaniya [Against Method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2007.

11. Berger P.L., Luckman T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. N.Y.: Anchor Books, 1966.

12. Clark A. Being There. Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge (Mass): The Mitt Press,1997.

13. Gergen K.J. Social Construction in Context. L.: SAGE, 2001.

14. Gergen K.J. Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973. Vol. 26. N 2. P. 309–320.

15. Gergen K.J. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist. 1985. N 40. P. 266–275.

16. Lektorski V.A. Realism as the Methodological Strategy in the Cognitive Science. Varieties of Scientific Realism: Objectivity and Truth in Science. Cham: Springer, 2017. P. 353–366.

17. Marecek J., Crawford M., Popp D. On the Construction of Gender, Sex, and Sexualities. The Psychology of Gender. N.Y., 2000. P. 192–216.

18. Noe A. Action in Perception. Cambridge (Mass). The Mitt Press, 2004.

19. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/ (accessed on 30.07.2018).

20. Vico G. On the Most Ancient Wisdom of the Italians: Unearthed from the Origins of the Latin Language, transl. by L.M. Palmer. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1988.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up