All
 
|
 
 


Post-Islamism: From Islamism to Muslim Democracy? Transformation of Islamist Parties in Tunisia and Morocco
 
PIIS032150750021339-4-1
DOI10.31857/S032150750021339-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Natalia Zherlitsyna 
Occupation: Senior Researcher, Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; Academic Secretary, Research Council for the problems of Africa, Russian Academy of Sciences; Associated Professor, RUDN
Affiliation:
Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
RUDN University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameAsia and Africa Today
EditionIssue 8
Pages50-58
Abstract

The article analyzes the transformation of the parties of political Islam in and after coming to power as a result of the revolutionary events of the Arab Spring. It was then, in the 2010s, after decades of repression and isolation, that adherents of political Islam had the opportunity to become key players on the new political scene in the region. Political Islam as a modern ideology faces fundamental existential questions about the nature and relevance of Islamism as a political project, and the issue of Islamists’ participation in the political life of the Muslim world is becoming increasingly relevant. In Tunisia and Morocco, parties of political Islam have been given the opportunity to integrate and be recognized in the political arena.

The inclusion of Islamists in legal political life in Tunisia and Morocco contributed to their ideological and political transformation, especially in relation to such complex issues as the relationship between religion and politics, issues of individual freedoms, human rights, minorities and women's issues. Scholars use the terms “post-Islamism” and “neo-Islamism” to define the changes that have taken place over the past decade. Which imply the transformation of socially conservative parties towards the adoption of the rules of a civil democratic political system and the rejection of the Islamization of society from above.

The Tunisian Islamist party Ennahda and the Moroccan Justice and Development Party have gone through somewhat similar paths over the past decade, having passed through the crucible of power and taking responsibility for the processes taking place in their countries. They have also shown flexibility in finding compromises and drawing dividing lines between their religious preaching activities and politics. Both parties continue to strike a balance in combining the right doses of Islamism, democracy, pluralism, secularism and national interests.

Keywordspolitical Islam, post-Islamism, Tunisia, Morocco, Ennahda, Justice and Development Party
AcknowledgmentThis article was prepared under Russian Science Foundation grant 19-18-00155, "Islamist Extremism in the Context of International Security: Threats to Russia and Possibilities of Counteraction.
Received05.05.2022
Publication date16.08.2022
Number of characters30292
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 300

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Ayoob M. 2010. The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 213 p.
2. Bayat А. 2007. Making Islam Democratic: Social Movements and the Post-Islamist Turn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 320 p.
3. Вayat A. 2013. Post-Islamism: The Many Faces of Political Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 368 p.
4. Chamkhi T. 2014. Neo-Islamism in the Post-Arab Spring. Contemporary Politics. № 20 (4). Рp. 453-68.
5. Roy O. 2013. There Will Be No Islamist Revolution. Journal of Democracy. № 24 (1). Рp. 14-19.
6. McCarthy R. 2018. When Islamists lose: The politicization of Tunisia’s Ennahda movement. The Middle East Journal. V. 72. № 3. Pp. 365-384.
7. Ben Salem M. 2018. Fluidité politique et transition incertaine d’Ennahdha vers l’islamo-démocratie. Partis politiques et transitions démocratiques. Tunis, Nirvana 267 p.
8. Pfeifer H. 2019. The Normative Power of Secularism. Tunisian Ennahda’s Discourse on Religion, Politics, and the State (2011-2016). Politics and Religion. V. 12. Issue 3. Pp. 478-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048319000075 
9. Mahdavi Mojtaba. 2019. Whither Post-Islamism: Revisiting the Discourse/Movement after the Arab Spring. Arab Spring and the Quest for New Metaphors: Modernity, Identity and Change. New York: Palgrave McMillan. Pp. 15-38.
10. Ben Lazreg H. 2021. Post-Islamism in Tunisia and Egypt: Contradictory Trajectories. Religions. № 12 (6). P. 408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060408 
11. Imad Abdul Ghani. 2019. Post-Islamism: Ideological Delusions and Sociological Realities. Contemporary Arab Affairs. № 12. Рр. 3-20.
12. Marks M. 2017. Tunisia. Rethinking Political Islam. New York: Oxford University Press. Рp. 32-53.
13. Bar’el Zvi. 2018. ‘Islamic Party’s Secret Weapon in Tunisia Local Elections: A Jewish Candidate’. Haaretz. February 26. https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/.premium-islamic-party-s-secret-weapon-in-tunisia-elections-a-jewishcandidate-1.5849408  (accessed 23.04.2022)
14. Lafrance C. 2019. Tunisie: Riyada, l’Académie qui prépare la relève d’Ennahdha. JeuneAfrique.com. 21 juillet 2019.
15. Issaev L.M., Aisin M.B., Medvedev I.A., Korotayev A.V. 2020. Islamic Terrorism in the Middle East and its Impact on Global Security. RUDN Journal of Political Science. 22 (4): 713-730 (In Russ.). DOI:10.22363/2313-1438-2020-22-4-713
16. Khayrullin T. 2021. Post-islamism: features, processes and prospects. Asia and Africa today. № 9, pp. 34-39 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S032150750016589-9
17. Buehler М. 2013. Safety-Valve Elections and the Arab Spring: The Weakening (and Resurgence) of Morocco’s Islamist Opposition Party. Terrorism and Political Violence. V. 25, № 1. Рр. 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2013.733274  (accessed 30.04.2022)
18. Islamic radical movements on the political map of the modern world. Sahara-Sahel zone and the Horn of Africa. 2020. Moscow. 210 p.
19. Mohamed Kareem Bokhsas. 2018. Hidden Information in the Relations between the Palace and Islamic Leaders. Jaridat al-Ayam. № 7971. March 15, 2018.
20. Saadeddine Othmani. 2009. Religion and Politics: Distinction, Not Separation. Arab Cultural Center. Dar AlKalema, Cairo. 157 p. (In Arab.)
21. Driss Maghraoui, Saloua Zerhouni. 2014. Searching for Political Normalization: The Party of Justice and Development in Morocco. Islamist Parties and Political Normalization in the Muslim World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Рр. 112-133. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wr8hs.8  (accessed 27.04.2022)
22. Mohamed El Hachimi. 2015. Democratization as a Learning Process: The Case of Morocco. The Journal of North African Studies. V. 20. № 5. Рр. 754-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2015.1081463 
23. Desrues T. 2017. Le tahakkoum et la parlementarisation du régime politique marocain à l’aune des élections de 2016. L’Année du Maghreb. № 17. Рр. 285-309.
24. Morocco: Mohammed VI unhappy with Abdelilah Benkirane. July 20, 2016. http://www.jeuneafrique.com/mag/342177/politique/  maroc-mohammed-vi-mecontent-a-lencontre-dabdelilah-benkirane/ (accessed 28.04.2022)
25. Desrues T. 2018. Le Maroc en 2017: Gouverner la “Monarchie executive” ou les logiques de l’autoritarisme. L’Année du Maghreb. № 19. Рр. 211-232.
26. Tarek Benhada. 2017. Al-Ramid: There May Be Unknown Reasons for Morocco’s Decision to Dismiss Benkirane. Hespress. March 18, 2017. https://www.hespress.com/politique  /343267.html (accessed 29.04.2022)
27. Abdul-Wahab Kayyali. 2018. The lessons of history: The PJD and the history of partisan politics in Morocco. The Middle East Institute. https://www.mei.edu/publications/lessons-history-pjd-and-history-partisan-politics-morocco  (accessed 30.04.2022)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up