A Complex Structure of a Simple View, or about ‘Turns’ in Philosophy in the XX Century

 
PIIS004287440002601-6-1
DOI10.31857/S004287440002601-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: History and Theory of Politics Chair, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameVoprosy filosofii
EditionIssue 12
Pages206-212
Abstract

The ever-increasing number of announced twists and turns in the philosophy of the 20th century makes a practically peripheral concept that states a complete continuity of the philosophy of the 19th and 20th centuries. This discursive formation called a “regard” (view) discourse by M. Foucault encompassing so far apart from the first glance things as, for instance, clinical medicine, dandyism, literary novel of the XIX century, positivism and phenomenology needs to be represented and its key points revealed. The article shows why the key moments of the “gaze” are: 1) the rejection of the “intellectual gaze” that penetrates through things and operates at the level of the laws of nature, the observation of the “impenetrable body” of things; 2) attempts to describe “objectively” the processes on the “surface” of things for hypothetical identification of internal processes (the role of sign); 3) the unity of the problem of reality “comprehension” and the problem of those imperfect hypothetical reconstructions multiplicity. It is shown that the so-understood formation of the “gaze” does indeed include, as possible variations, the numerous subsequent turns in philosophy – linguistic, iconic, anthropological and other.

Keywordsmodern, linguistic turn, anthropological turn, reality, subjectivity, objectification, project of modern, “view” formation, M. Foucault
Received20.12.2018
Publication date20.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 1814

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Apel, Karl-Otto. Towards a transcendental Semiotics (Russian Translation 2001).

2. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Philosophie und Literatur”. Was ist Literatur? Beitrage von H.-G. Gadamer, H. Kuhn, G. Funke (Russian Translation 1991).

3. Hartmann, Nicolai. Zur Grundlegung der Ontologie (Russian Translation 2003).

4. De Man, Paul. Blidness and Insight. Esseys in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism (Russian Translation 2002).

5. Foucault, Michel. Naissance de la clinique (Russian Translation 1998).

6. Habermas, Jürgen. Philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Zwoelf Vorlesungen (Russian Translation 1997).

7. Schlick, Moritz. Die Wende der Philosophie (Russian Translation 1993).

8. Rorty, Richard (ed.) (1967) The Linguistic Turn. Essays in Philosophical Method, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

9. Mamardashvili, Merab K., Solovyov, Erik Yu., Shvyrev, Vladimir S. (1970–1971) Classics and Contemporaniety: Two Epochs in the Development of Bourgeois Philosophy (http://texts.news/problemyi-filosofiiknigi/mamardashvili-solovev-shvyirev-klassika-29932.html), (in Russian).

10. Mikhailov, Aleksandr (1988) “Antiquity as an Ideal and Cultural Reality of 18th–19th Centuries”, Antiquity as a Type of Culture, A.F. Losev (ed.), Nauka, Moscow, pp. 308–324 (in Russian).

11. Savchuk, Valery (2013) “The Phenomenon of Turn in 20th Century Culture”, Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovanii kultury, 2013, Vol. 1, pp. 92–108 (in Russian).

12. Wulf Kristof (2004) Anthropologie. Philosophie, Geschichte, Kultur, Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg (Russian Translation 2008).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up