1. Apresjan Y. D. On the experimental explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 1968. No. 5. Pp. 34—49.
2. Apresjan Yu. D. On the language for describing word meanings. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 1969. No. 5. Pp. 415—428.
3. Apresjan Yu. D. Leksicheskaya semantika. Sinonimicheskie sredstva yazyka [Lexical semantics. Synonymic means of language]. Moscow: Nauka, 1974.
4. Apresjan Yu. D. Types of information for surface syntactic component of the Meaning ⇔ Text Model. Wiener slawistischer Almanach. Sonderband I. 1980.] (переизд.: Апресян Ю. Д. Избранные труды. Т. I. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 1995. С. 8—101.)
5. Apresjan Yu. D. Deixis in lexicon and grammar and the naive model of the world. Semiotika i informatika. No. 28. Moscow: All-Union Institute of Scientific and Technical Information, 1986. Pp. 5—33.] (переизд.: Апресян Ю. Д. Избранные труды. Т. I. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 1995. С. 629—650.)
6. Apresjan Yu. D., Iomdin L. L. Constructions of the type NEGDE SPAT’ ‘no place to sleep’: syntax, semantics, lexicography. Semiotika i informatika. No. 29. Moscow: All-Union Institute of Scientific and Technical Information, 1989. Pp. 34—92.
7. Arutyunova N. D. Problems of syntax and semantics in Ch. Fillmore’s works. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 1973. No. 1. Pp. 117—124.
8. Boguslavsky I. M. Sfera deistviya leksicheskikh edinits [Scope of lexical units]. Moscow: Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury, 1996.
9. Gak V. G. A problem of syntactic semantics (semantic interpretation of «deep» and «surface» structures). Invariantnye sintaksicheskie znacheniya i struktura predlozheniya. Arutyunova N. D. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1969.
10. Iomdin L. L. Deep in microsyntax: A lexical class of syntactic phrasemes. Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual’nye tekhnologii (Dialog’2008). Trudy Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii. Bekasovo, June 4—8, 2008. No. 7 (14). Moscow: Russian State Univ. for the Humanities, 2008. Pp. 178—184.
11. Katsnel’son S. D. Notes on Ch. Fillmore’s case theory. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 1988. No. 1. Pp. 110—117.
12. Kibrik A. E. The subject and the problem of the universal model of language. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 1979. Vol. 38. No. 4.] (переизд.: Кибрик А. Е. Очерки по общим и прикладным вопросам языкознания. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1992.)
13. Maisak T. A., Rakhilina E. V. (eds). Glagoly dvizheniya v vode: leksicheskaya tipologiya [Aqua-motion verbs: Lexical typology]. Moscow: Indrik, 2007.
14. Martem’yanov Yu. S. Sentence generation and the study of lexicon (about «The case for case» by Ch. Fillmore). Mashinnyi perevod i prikladnaya lingvistika. No. 13. М.: Maurice Thorez Moscow State Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages, 1970. Pp. 201—217.] (переизд.: Мартемьянов Ю. С.. Логика ситуаций. Строение текста. Терминологичность слов. М.: Языки русской культуры, 2004. С. 602—616.)
15. Paducheva E. V. Semanticheskie issledovaniya [Semantic investigations]. Moscow: Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury, 1996.
16. Padučeva E. V. The genitive case of the subject: Syntax or semantics? Voprosy jazykoznanija. 1997. No. 2. Pp. 111—116.
17. Plungian V. A., Rakhilina E. V. Tušat-tušat — ne potušat: The grammar of a verb construction. Lingvistika konstruktsii. Rakhilina E. V. (ed.). Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2010. Pp. 83—95.
18. Propp V. Ya. Morfologiya skazki [Morphology of the folk tale]. Leningrad: Academia, 1928.
19. Rakhilina E. V. (ed.). Lingvistika konstruktsii [Construction linguistics]. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2010.
20. Rakhilina E. V., Plungian V. A. Yu. D. Apresjan as a theoretician of Сonstruction Grammar. Slovo i yazyk. Sb. k 80-letiyu akad. Yu. D. Apresjana. Boguslavsky I. M., Iomdin L. L., Krysin L. P. (eds) Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2010. Pp. 548—557.
21. Raxilina E. V., Reznikova T. I. Frame-based approach to lexical typology. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 2013. No. 2. Pp. 3—31.
22. Fillmore Ch. The case for case. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Zvegintsev V. A. (ed.). No. X. Moscow: Progress, 1981. Pp. 369—495.
23. Ackerman F., Moore J. A Theory of argument structure. Stanford: CSLI, 2001.
24. Adger D. Constructions and grammatical explanation. Queen Mary’s occasional papers advancing linguistics. 2012. Vol. 26. Pp. 1—14.
25. Baker M. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press, 1988.
26. Bresnan J. Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
27. Carnie A. Syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
28. Carlson G. Thematic roles and event individuation. Events and grammar. Rothstein S. (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998. Pp. 35—51.
29. Chomsky N. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957. (русск. пер.: Хомский Н. Синтаксические структуры // Звегинцев В. А. (ред.). Новое в лингвистике. Вып. II. М.: Прогресс, 1962.)
30. Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 1965. (русск. пер.: Хомский Н. Аспекты теории синтаксиса. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1972).
31. Chomsky N. Lectures on government and binding. The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.
32. Comrie B. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1981.; 2nd ed., 1989.
33. Croft W. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2001.
34. Dixon R. M. W. Ergativity. Language. 1979. Vol. 55. No. 1. Pp. 59–138.
35. Dowty D. R. On the semantic content of the notion ‘thematic role’. Properties, types and meaning. Chierchia G., Partee B. H., Turner R. (eds). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989. Pp. 69–129.
36. Dowty D. R. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language. 1991. Vol. 67. No. 3. Pp. 547—619.
37. Fillmore Ch. J. The position of embedding transformations in a grammar. Word. 1963. Vol. 19. Pp. 208—231.
38. Fillmore Ch. J. The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory. Bach E., Harms R. (eds). New-York: Harper and Row. 1968. Pp. 1—88. (русск. пер.: Ч. Филлмор. Дело о падеже // Филлмор Ч. Дело о падеже // Звегинцев В. А. (ред.). Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. X. М.: Прогресс, 1981. С. 369—495.)
39. Fillmore Ch. J. Types of lexical information. Studies in Syntax and Semantics. Kiefer F. (ed.): Dordrecht: Reidel. 1969. Pp. 109—137.
40. Fillmore Ch. J. Verbs of judging: an exercise in semantic description. Studies in Linguistic Semantics. Fillmore Ch. J., Langendoen D. T. (eds). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971. Pp. 272—289.
41. Fillmore Ch. J. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the First annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society. Cogen C., Thompson H., Wright J. (eds). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1975. Pp. 123–131.
42. Fillmore Ch. J. Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. Bloomington (IN): Indiana Univ. Linguistics Club, 1975.
43. Fillmore Ch. J. The case for case reopened. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 8. Cole P., Sadock J. M. (eds). New-York: Academic Press, 1977. Pp. 59—81.
44. Fillmore Ch. J. Frame semantics. Linguistics in the morning calm. Papers prepared for the 1981 Seoul International conference on linguistics. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., 1982. Pp. 111—137.
45. Fillmore Ch. J. How to know whether you’re coming or going. Essays on deixis. Rauh G. (ed.). Tübingen: Narr, 1983. Pp. 219—227.
46. Fillmore Ch. J. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica. 1985. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pp. 222—254. (русск. пер.: Фреймы и семантика понимания // Петров В. В., Герасимов В. И. (ред.). Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. XXIII. М.: Прогресс, 1988.)
47. Fillmore Ch. J. «Corpus linguistics» vs. «Computer-aided armchair linguistics». Directions in corpus linguistics. Proceedings from a 1991 Nobel symposium on corpus linguistics. Stockholm: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992. Pp. 35—66.
48. Fillmore Ch. J. Lectures on deixis. Stanford: CSLI, 1997.
49. Fillmore Ch. J. Encounters with language. Computational Linguistics. 2012. Vol. 38 (4). Pp. 701—718.
50. Fillmore Ch. J., Atkins B. T. S. Towards a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. Frames, fields and contrasts. Lehrer A., Kittay E. F. (eds). Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992. Pp. 75—102.
51. Fillmore Ch. J., Atkins B. T. S. Starting where the dictionaries stop: The challenge for computational lexicography. Computational approaches to the lexicon. Atkins B. T. S., Zampolli A. (eds). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1994. Pp. 349—393.
52. Fillmore Ch. J., Atkins B. T. S. Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches. Leacock Y. and C. (eds). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000. Pp. 91—110.
53. Fillmore Ch. J., Kay P., O’Connor C. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language. 1988. Vol. 64. Pp. 501—538.
54. Fried M., Boas H. C. (eds). Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005.
55. Fried M., Östman J.-O. (eds). Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004.
56. Goldberg A. E. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1995.
57. Goldberg A. E. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2006.
58. Greimas A.-J. Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse, 1966.
59. Grimshaw J. Argument structure. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 1990.
60. Gruber J. S. Studies in lexical relations. Ph. D. dissertation. MIT, 1965.
61. Hale K., Keyser S. J. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 2001.
62. Jackendoff R. Semantic structures. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 1990.
63. Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. Approaching lexical typology. From polysemy to semantic change: A typology of lexical semantic associations. Vanhove M. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. Pp. 3—52.
64. Lidz J., Williams A. Constructions on holiday. Cognitive Linguistics. 2009. Vol. 20. No. 1. Pp. 177—189.
65. Lowe J. B., Baker C. F., Fillmore Ch. J. A frame-semantic approach to semantic annotation. Proceedings of the SIGLEX workshop «Tagging text with lexical semantics: Why, what, and how?» held April 4—5, in Washington, D. C., USA in conjunction with ANLP-97. 1997. Pp. 18—24.
66. Östman J-O., Fried M. (eds). Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005.
67. Partee B. H. Lexical semantics and compositionality. Invitation to cognitive science. Part I: Language. Gleitman L., Liberman M. (eds). Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 1995. Pp. 311—360.
68. Tesnière L. Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck, 1959. (русск. пер. Теньер Л. Основы структурного синтаксиса. М.: Прогресс, 1988.)
69. Tomasello M. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Univ. Press, 2003.
70. Wilkins D. P., Hill D. When go means come: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive linguistics. 1995. Vol. 6. No. 2/3. Pp. 209—256.