Language and Cognition: A Postrelativist Research Program

 
PIIS0373658X0005709-8-1
DOI10.31857/S0373658X0005709-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameVoprosy Jazykoznanija
EditionIssue 4
Pages106-136
Abstract

This article analyses contemporary trends in the study of how natural language influences cognitive processes, and formulates a new program of interdisciplinary research in the field of language and cognition. The author first briefly examines the history of “the linguistic relativity hypothesis” (“the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis”), focusing on the neorelativist research program and results achieved in the period from 1990 to 2010. Next, the weak points in the neorelativist project are highlighted and the author introduces the fundamental tenets of postrelativism, a new theoretical model that attempts to recontextualize the main ideas of Benjamin Whorf while taking account of contemporary tendencies in linguistics (neostructuralism) and cognitive science (postcognitivism). The second half of the article formulates a research program for the field of language and cognition. Different levels of cognition are considered (pre-conceptual experience, perception, thought, philosophical activity) and their connection with the structure of natural language examined. Relying on the latest discoveries in these fields, the author outlines what he considers to be the most productive research problems.

Keywordscognitive linguistics, language and cognition, linguistic relativity
Received01.09.2019
Publication date02.09.2019
Number of characters102852
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1878

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Benvenist 1974 — Benvenist Eh. Obschaya lingvistika. M.: Progress, 1974. [Benveniste E. Obshchaya lingvistika [General linguistics]. Moscow: Progress, 1974].

2. Blehk 1960 — Blehk M. Lingvisticheskaya otnositel'nost' (Teoreticheskie vozzreniya Bendzhamena L. Uorfa). Per. s angl. Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp. 1. Zvegintsev V. A. (red.). M.: Izd-vo inostrannoj lit-ry, 1960, 199–214. [Black M. Linguistic relativity: The views of Benjamin Lee Whorf. The Philosophical Review, 1959, 68(2): 228–238.]

3. Borodaj 2013 — Borodaj S. Yu. Sovremennoe ponimanie problemy lingvisticheskoj otnositel'nosti: raboty po prostranstvennoj kontseptualizatsii. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2013, 4: 17–54. [Boroday S. Yu. The problem of linguistic relativity today: Studies in spatial conceptualization. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2013, 4: 17–54.]

4. Borodaj 2019 — Borodaj S. Yu. Yazyk i poznanie: Vvedenie v postrelyativizm. M.: OOO Sadra; Izdatel'skij dom YaSK, 2019. [Boroday S. Yu. Yazyk i poznanie: Vvedenie v postrelyativizm [Language and cognition: An introduction to the postrelativism]. Moscow: Sadra LLC; YaSK Publishing House, 2019.]

5. Burgete 1994 — Burgete A. R. K voprosu o filosofskoj mysli mezoamerikanskikh tsivilizatsij. Istoriko-filosofskij ezhegodnik 1992. M.: Nauka, 1994, 77–101. [Burguete A. R. On the philosophical thought of Mesoamerican civilizations. Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik 1992. Moscow: Nauka, 1994, 77–101.]

6. Verani 2010 — Verani A. Rol' vnutrennej rechi v vysshikh psikhicheskikh protsessakh. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya, 1: 7–17. [Verani A. The role of inner speech in higher psychological processes. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya, 1: 7–17.]

7. Zaliznyak i dr. 2005 — Zaliznyak Anna A., Levontina I. B., Shmelev A. D. Klyuchevye idei russkoj yazykovoj kartiny mira. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2005. [Zaliznyak Anna A., Levontina I. B., Shmelev A. D. Klyuchevye idei russkoi yazykovoi kartiny mira [Key notions of the Russian linguistic worldview]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2005.]

8. Kobzev 2006 — Kobzev A. I. Obschemirovozzrencheskie sledstviya otsutstviya svyazki «byt'» («est'») i ponyatiya «bytie». Dukhovnaya kul'tura Kitaya. Filosofiya. Titarenko M. L., Kobzev A. I., Luk'yanov A. E. (red.). M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2006, 120–126. [Kobzev A. I. General worldview consequences of the absence of the copula ‘to be’ and of the concept of ‘existence’. Dukhovnaya kul’tura Kitaya. Filosofiya. Titarenko M. L., Kobzev A. I., Luk’yanov A. E. (eds.). Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2006, 120–126.]

9. Lakoff 2004 — Lakoff Dzh. Zhenschiny, ogon' i opasnye veschi. Chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii. Per. s angl. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2004. [Lakoff G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1987.]

10. Lakoff, Dzhonson 2004 — Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Per. s angl. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. [Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980.]

11. Leon-Portil'ya 1961 — Leon-Portil'ya M. Filosofiya nagua. Issledovanie istochnikov. Per. s isp. M: Izd-vo inostrannoj lit-ry, 1961. [León-Portilla M. La filosofía Náhuatl: Estudiada en sus fuentes. México: Instituto Indigenista Interamericano, 1956.]

12. Losev 1994 — Losev A. F. Istoriya antichnoj ehstetiki. Tom VIII. Kniga 2. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. [Losev A. F. Istoriya antichnoi estetiki [History of ancient aesthetics]. Vol. VIII. Book 2.. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1994.]

13. Luriya 1979 — Luriya A. R. Yazyk i soznanie. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1979. [Luria A. R. Yazyk i soznanie [Language and consciousness]. Moscow: Moscow State Univ. Publ., 1979.]

14. Lysenko 2014 — Lysenko V. G. Genezis ucheniya ob atomakh kak problema yazyka i myshleniya. Voprosy filosofii, 2014, 6: 9–28. [Lysenko V. G. The genesis of atomistic theory as a problem of language and thought. Voprosy filosofii, 2014, 6: 9–28.]

15. Pinker 2004 — Pinker S. Yazyk kak instinkt. Per. s angl. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. [Pinker S. The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow & Co., 1994.]

16. Plungyan 2011 — Plungyan V. A. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku. M.: RGGU, 2011. [Plungian V. A. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku [Introduction to grammatical semantics]. Moscow: Russian State Univ. for the Humanities, 2011.]

17. Radchenko 2005 — Radchenko O. A. Yazyk kak mirosozidanie: Lingvofilosofskaya kontseptsiya neogumbol'dtianstva. M.: Editorial URSS, 2005. [Radchenko O. A. Yazyk kak mirosozidanie: Lingvofilosofskaya kontseptsiya neogumbol’dtianstva [Language as world creation: Linguo-philosophical foundations of Neo-Humboldtianism]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2005.]

18. Rakhilina 1998 — Rakhilina E. V. Kognitivnaya semantika: istoriya, personalii, idei, rezul'taty. Semiotika i informatika, 1998, 36: 274–322. [Rakhilina E. V. Sognitive semantics: History, personalia, ideas, results. Semiotika i informatika, 1998, 36: 274–322.]

19. Sepir 1928/1993 — Sepir Eh. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu i kul'turologii. M.: Progress, 1993. [Sapir E. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu i kul’turologii [Selected writings in language and culture]. Moscow: Progress, 1993.]

20. Skrebtsova 2011 — Skrebtsova T. G. Kognitivnaya lingvistika. Kurs lektsij. SPb.: SPbGU, 2011. [Skrebtsova T. G. Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Univ., 2011.]

21. Smirnov 2015 — Smirnov A. V. Soznanie. Logika. Yazyk. Kul'tura. Smysl. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2015. [Smirnov A. V. Soznanie. Logika. Yazyk. Kul’tura. Smysl [Consciousness. Logic. Language. Culture. Meaning]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2015.]

22. Sokolov 2007 — Sokolov A. N. Vnutrennyaya rech' i myshlenie. M.: URSS, 2007. [Sokolov A. N. Vnutrennyaya rech’ i myshlenie [Inner speech and thinking]. Moscow: URSS, 2007.]

23. Khajms 1975 — Khajms D. Kh. Dva tipa lingvisticheskoj otnositel'nosti. Per. s angl. Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. 7. Chemodanov N. S. (red.). M.: Progress, 1975, 229–298. [Hymes D. H. Two types of linguistic relativity. Sociolinguistics: Proc. of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference 1964. The Hague: Mouton, 1966, 114–167.]

24. Khomskij 1968/1972 — Khomskij N. Yazyk i myshlenie. Per. s angl. M.: MGU, 1972. [Chomsky N. Language and mind. 1st edn. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968.]

25. Shmelev 2002 — Shmelev A. D. Russkij yazyk i vneyazykovaya dejstvitel'nost'. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2002. [Shmelev A. D. Russkii yazyk i vneyazykovaya deistvitel’nost’ [The Russian language and extralinguistic reality]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2002].

26. Yakobson 1985 — Yakobson R. O. Izbrannye raboty. M.: Progress, 1985. [Jakobson R. O. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Moscow: Progress, 1985.]

27. Baddeley 2012 — Baddeley A. Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 2012, 63: 1–29.

28. Barsalou 1999 — Barsalou L. Perceptual symbol systems. Brain and Behavioural Sciences, 1999, 22: 577–660.

29. Barsalou 2008 — Barsalou L. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, 59: 617–645.

30. Boutonett et al. 2012 — Boutonnet B., Athanasopoulos P., Thierry G. Unconscious effects of grammatical gender during object categorisation. Brain Research, 2012, 1479: 72–79.

31. Bowerman 2011 — Bowerman M. Linguistic typology and first language acquisition. The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Song J. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2011, 591–617.

32. Brown 2006 — Brown P. Cognitive anthropology. Language, culture, and society: Key topics in linguistic anthropology. Jourdan Ch., Tuite K. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, 96–114.

33. Carroll 1963 — Carroll J. B. Linguistic relativity, contrastive linguistics and language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 1963, 1: 1–20.

34. Choi, Hattrup 2012 — Choi S., Hattrup K. Relative contribution of perception/cognition and language on spatial categorization. Cognitive Science, 2012, 36: 102–129.

35. Clark 2008 — Clark A. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognition extension. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008.

36. Croft 2001 — Croft W. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2001.

37. Croft, Cruze 2004 — Croft W., Cruze D. A. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004.

38. Dasen, Mishra 2010 — Dasen P., Mishra R. Development of geocentric spatial language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010.

39. Everett 2008 — Everett C. Evidence for language-mediated thought in the perception of non-gendered figures. Texas Linguistic Forum, 2008, 52: 24–33.

40. Everett 2012 — Everett C. Independent cross-cultural data reveal linguistic effects on basic numerical cognition. Language and Cognition, 2012, 5(1): 99–104.

41. Everett 2013 — Everett C. Linguistic relativity: Evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 2013.

42. Fausey, Boroditsky 2011 — Fausey C., Boroditsky L. Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory. Psychonomic Bulletins & Review, 2011, 18: 150–157.

43. Fodor 1983 — Fodor J. The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1983.

44. Friedrich 1986 — Friedrich P. The language parallax: Linguistic relativism and poetic indeterminacy. Austin (TX): Univ. of Texas, 1986.

45. Geeraerts, Cuyckens 2007 — Geeraerts D., Cuyckens H. Introducing cognitive linguistics. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Geeraerts D., Cuyckens H. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2007, 1–24.

46. Gentner 2003 — Gentner D. Why we’re so smart. Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Gentner D., Goldin-Meadow S. (eds.). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2003, 195–236.

47. Gilbert et al. 2006 — Gilbert A., Regier T., Kay P., Ivry R. Whorf is supported in the right visual field but not the left. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006, 103: 489–494.

48. Gleitman, Papafragou 2013 — Gleitman L., Papafragou A. Relations between language and thought. The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology. Reisberg D. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2013, 504–523.

49. Glenberg, Gallese 2012 — Glenberg A., Gallese V. Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 2012, 48: 905–922.

50. Gomila 2012 — Gomila T. Verbal minds: Language and the architecture of cognition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012.

51. Gomila, Calvo 2008 — Gomila T., Calvo P. Directions for an embodied cognitive science: Toward an integrated approach. Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach. Calvo P., Gomila T. (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008, 1–20.

52. Graham 1989 — Graham A. C. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical argument in ancient China. Chicago: Open Court, 1989.

53. Hanks 1990 — Hanks W. Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1990.

54. Haspelmath 2010 — Haspelmath M. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language, 2010, 86 (3): 663–687.

55. Hengeveld, Mackenzie 2008 — Hengeveld K., Mackenzie J. L. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008.

56. Hill, Mannheim 1992 — Hill J., Mannheim B. Language and world view. Annual Review of Anthropology, 1992, 21: 381–406.

57. Hoijer (ed.) 1954 — Hoijer H. (ed.). Language in culture. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1954.

58. Holyoak, Morrison 2012 — Holyoak K. J., Morrison R. G. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012.

59. Huette et al. 2012 — Huette S., Winter B., Matlock T., Spivey M. Processing motion implied in language: Eye-movement differences during aspect comprehension. Cognitive Processing, 2012, 13: 193–197.

60. Johnson 1987 — Johnson M. The body in the mind. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1987.

61. Kahn 2003 — Kahn Ch. The verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek. London: Hackett Publishing Company, 2003.

62. Kay, Kempton 1984 — Kay P., Kempton W. What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 1984, 86: 65–79.

63. Klein et al. 2013 — Klein D., Mok K., Chen J., Watkins K. Age of language learning shapes brain structure: A cortical thickness study of bilingual and monolingual individuals. Brain & Language, 2013, 131: 20–24.

64. Koerner 2000 — Koerner E. F. Towards a ‘full pedigree’ of ‘Sapir-Whorf hypothesis’: From Locke to Lucy. Explorations in Linguistic Relativity. Pütz M., Verspoor M. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000, 1–24.

65. Kuhl 2010 — Kuhl P. Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron, 2010, 67: 713–727.

66. Langacker 1976 — Langacker R. W. Semantic representations and the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Foundations of Language, 1976, 14(3): 307–357.

67. Le Guen 2011 — Le Guen O. Speech and gesture in spatial language and cognition among the Yucatec Mayas. Cognitive Science, 2011, 35: 905–938.

68. Leavitt 2006 — Leavitt J. Linguistic relativities. Language, culture and society. Jourdan Ch., Tuite K. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, 47–81.

69. Lee 1996 — Lee P. The Whorf Theory Complex. A critical reconstruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996.

70. Lee, Schwarz 2012 — Lee S., Schwarz N. Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, 103: 737–749.

71. Levinson 2003 — Levinson S. C. Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.

72. Lucy 1992 — Lucy J. Language diversity and thought. A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.

73. Lucy 1997 — Lucy J. The linguistics of “color”. Color categories in thought and language. Hardin C. L., Maffi L. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997, 320–346.

74. Lupyan 2012a — Lupyan G. Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2012, 3(54): 1–13.

75. Lupyan 2012b — Lupyan G. What do words do? Toward a theory of language-augmented thought. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2012, 57: 255–297.

76. Majid et al. 2004 — Majid A., Bowerman M., Kita S., Haun D., Levinson S. C. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004, 8(3): 108–114.

77. Malt, Wolff 2010 — Malt B., Wolff Ph. (eds.). Words and the mind: How words capture human experience. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010.

78. Matlock 2010 — Matlock T. Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition, 2010, 2: 243–260.

79. Meteyard et al. 2012 — Meteyard L., Cuadrado S., Bahrami B., Vigliocco G. Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48: 788–804.

80. Miles et al. 2010 — Miles L., Nind L., Macrae C. Moving through time. Psychological Science, 2010, 21: 222–223.

81. Núñez, Cooperrider 2013 — Núñez R., Cooperrider K. The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2013, 17(5): 220–229.

82. Pavlenko 2014 — Pavlenko A. The Bilingual Mind… and what it tells us about language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014.

83. Penn 1972 — Penn J. Linguistic relativity versus innate ideas: The origins of the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis in German thought. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.

84. Pinker 2007 — Pinker S. The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. London: Penguin Books Ltd, 2007.

85. Regier, Kay 2009 — Regier T., Kay P. Language, thought and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2009, 13(10): 439–446.

86. Roberson et al. 2000 — Roberson D., Davies I., Davidoff J. Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a Stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2000, 129: 369–398.

87. Roberson, Hanley 2010 — Roberson D., Hanley J. Relatively speaking: An account of the relationship between language and thought in the color domain. Words and the mind: How words capture human experience. Malt B., Wolff Ph. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010, 165–182.

88. Silverstein 1979 — Silverstein M. Language structure and linguistic ideology. The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Clyne P., Hanks W., Hofbauer C. (eds.). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1979, 193–247.

89. Sinha et al. 2011 — Sinha C., Sinha V., Zinken J., Sampaio W. When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 2011, 3: 137–169.

90. Slobin 2003 — Slobin D. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Gentner D., Goldin-Meadow S. (eds.). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2003, 157–192.

91. Spelke 2003 — Spelke E. What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Gentner D., Goldin-Meadow S. (eds.). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2003, 277–312.

92. Spelke, Tsivkin 2001 — Spelke E., Tsivkin S. Initial knowledge and conceptual change: Space and number. Language acquisition and conceptual development. Bowerman M., Levinson S. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001, 70–100.

93. Strömqvist, Verhoeven 2004 — Strömqvist S., Verhoeven L. (eds.). Relating events in narrative. Vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives. New Jersey: Erlbaum, 2004.

94. von Stutterheim et al. 2012 — von Stutterheim C., Andermann M., Carroll M., Flecken M., Schmiedtová B. How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics, 2012, 50(4): 833–867.

95. Tosun et al. 2013 — Tosun S., Vaid J., Geraci L. Does obligatory linguistic marking of source of evidence affect source memory? A Turkish/English investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 2013, 69(2): 121–134.

96. de Villiers J., de Villiers P. 2009 — de Villiers J., de Villiers P. Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. Children’s reasoning and the mind. Mitchell P., Riggs K. (eds.). Hove: Psychology Press, 2000, 191–226.

97. Wassmann, Dasen 1998 — Wassmann J., Dasen P. Balinese spatial orientation: Some empirical evidence of moderate linguistic relativity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 1998, 4: 689–711.

98. Whorf 1956 — Whorf B. L. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings by Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1956.

99. Wilson, Gibbs 2007 — Wilson N., Gibbs R. Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 2007, 31: 721–731.

100. Winawer et al. 2007 — Winawer J., Witthoft N., Frank M., Wu L., Boroditsky L. Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104: 7780–7785.

101. Zwaan 2004 — Zwaan R. The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 44. Ross B. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 2004, 35–62.

102. Zwaan et al. 2010 — Zwaan R., Taylor L., de Boer M. Motor resonance as a function of narrative time: Further tests of the linguistic focus hypothesis. Brain & Language, 2010, 112: 143–149.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up