All
 
|
 
 


A comparative study of manner salience in Ilami Kurdish
 
PIIS0373658X0004900-9-1
DOI10.31857/S0373658X0004900-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Amir Karimipour 
Affiliation: University of Isfahan
Address: Iran, Isfahan
Vali Rezai
Affiliation: University of Isfahan
Address: Iran, Isfahan
Rezvan Motavallian
Affiliation: University of Isfahan
Address: Iran, Isfahan
Journal nameVoprosy Jazykoznanija
EditionIssue 3
Pages101-124
Abstract

This paper is an attempt to evaluate “manner of motion salience” in Ilami, a southern dialect of Kurdish. Manner components can cross-linguistically be encoded by main verbs, manner verbs, manner preverbs, and ideophones, among other linguistic devices. First, we will discuss the ways this semantic component is expressed in Ilami Kurdish. Then, in order to assess the salience of the manner component, a dictionary-based lexical survey and several experimental trials will be carried out. Following a study by F. E. Cardini (“Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian”, 2008), we will conduct a vocabulary investigation to calculate the number of manner verbs in Ilami Kurdish, and then compare the statistics with Italian (a verb-framed language) and English (a satellite-framed language) to measure manner salience in Ilami Kurdish in comparison with other languages. We will also perform several experimental trials, aimed at evaluating manner salience in the actual use of this dialect. Accordingly, the experiments will be carried out to assess “ease of lexical access”, which helps us to understand how readily participants (children and adults) can retrieve manner verbs from memory. Cross-linguistic analysis of Ilami Kurdish shows that this dialect is a relatively highly manner salient language, in which the elaboration of the manner component is rich and pervasive. This finding is supported by the dictionary-based lexical survey as well as ease of lexical access trials. Use of various strategies by Ilami Kurdish speakers to express manner sheds some light on the fact that manner salience is not solely affected by the lexicalization patterns of languages, as this component can also be encoded regardless of the path coding position.

Keywordsexperimental trial, Ilami Kurdish, manner, motion event, salience
Received24.06.2019
Publication date24.06.2019
Number of characters64712
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1671

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Akita et al. 2010 — Akita K., Matsumoto Y., Ohara K. H. Idō-hyōgen no ruikei-ron ni okeru chokuji-teki keiro-hyōgen to yōtai goi repātorı̄ [Deictic path expressions and manner lexicon in the typology of motion expressions]. Lexicon Forum, 5. Kageyama T. (ed.). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo, 2010, 1–25.
2. Akita, Matsumoto (in press) — Akita K., Matsumoto Y. A fine-grained analysis of manner salience: Experimental evidence from Japanese and English. (Human Cognitive Processing series.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, in press. (Preprinted version: https://researchmap.jp/?action=cv_download_main&upload_  id=152232.)
3. Asatrian 1999 — Asatrian G. The holy brotherhood: The Yezidi religious institution of the “Brother” and the “Sister” of the “Next World”. Iran and the Caucasus, 1999, 3/4: 79–97.
4. Asatrian, Arakelova 2002 — Asatrian G., Arakelova V. Ethnic minorities of Armenia. Yerevan, 2002.
5. Cardini 2008 — Cardini F. E. Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 2008, 19(4): 533–569.
6. Cifuentes Férez 2007 — Cifuentes Férez P. Human locomotion verbs in English Spanish. International Journal of English Studies, 2007, 7(1): 117–136.
7. Fanego 2012 — Fanego T. Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica, 2012, 33: 29–85.
8. Goldhahn et al. 2012 — Goldhahn D., Eckart Th., Quasthoff U. Building large monolingual dictionaries at the Leipzig Corpora Collection: From 100 to 200 languages. Proc. of the 8th International Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12). 2012.
9. Ibarretxe-Antuñano 2004 — Ibarretxe-Antuñano I. Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 2004, 15(3): 317–349.
10. Ibarretxe-Antuñano 2008 — Ibarretxe-Antuñano I. Path salience in motion events. Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. Lieven E., Ervin-Tripp S., Guo J., Budwig N., Nakamura K., Özçalişkan Ş. (eds.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008, 403–414.
11. Jalilian (ed.) 2006 — Jalilian A. (ed.). Ferhengi Bashur [Bashur dictionary]. Tehran: Porseman Publishing House, 2006.
12. Karimipour, Rezai 2016 — Karimipour A., Rezai V. Typological analysis of Ilami Kurdish verbs of motion. With focus on the concept of path. STUF — Language Typology and Universals, 2016, 69(3): 411–435.
13. Lindsey 2011 — Lindsey T. S. Bulgarian verbs of motion: Slavic verbs in a Balkan context. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of California, Berkeley, 2011.
14. Ruhani (ed.) 2012 — Ruhani M. M. (ed.). Farhang-e Farsi-Kordi [Farsi-Kurdish dictionary]. Sanandaj: Univ. of Kurdistan, 2012.
15. Skjærvø 2006 — Skjærvø P. O. Kurdish. Encyclopedia of language & linguistics. Brown K. (ed.). Oxford: Elsevier, 2006, 265–266. DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02225-2.
16. Slobin 1997 — Slobin D. I. Mind, code, and text. Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón. Bybee J., Haiman J., Thompson S. A. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1997, 437–467.
17. Slobin 2000 — Slobin D. I. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. Evidence for linguistic relativity. Niemeier S., Dirven R. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000, 107–138.
18. Slobin 2003 — Slobin D. I. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. Advances in the investigation of language and thought. Gentner D., Goldin-Meadow S. (eds.). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2003, 157–191.
19. Slobin 2004 — Slobin D. I. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives in translation. Strömqvist S., Verhoeven L. (eds.). Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004, 219–257.
20. Slobin 2006a — Slobin D. I. What makes manner of motion salient? Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories. Hickmann M., Robert S. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006, 59–82.
21. Slobin 2006b — Slobin D. I. Typology and usage: Explorations of motion events across languages. Paper given at the V International Conference of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, Univ. of Murcia, Spain, October 2006.
22. Slobin, Hoiting 1994 — Slobin D. I., Hoiting N. Reference to movement in spoken and signed language: Typological considerations. Proc. of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1994, 487–505.
23. Talmy 1985 — Talmy L. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language typology and lexical descriptions: Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Shopen T. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985, 36–149.
24. Talmy 1991 — Talmy L. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 1991, 7, 480–519.
25. Talmy 2000 — Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2000.
26. Verkerk 2014 — Verkerk A. The evolutionary dynamics of motion event encoding. Ph.D. diss. Nijmegen: Radboud Univ. Nijmegen, 2014.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up