An experimental study of russian possible verbs prefixed in o- and u

 
PIIS0373658X0003426-7-1
DOI10.31857/S0373658X0003426-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Universitetet i Tromsø: Norges arktiske universitet
Address: Norway, Tromsø
Affiliation: Universitetet i Tromsø: Norges arktiske universitet
Address: Norway, Tromsø
Journal nameVoprosy Jazykoznanija
EditionIssue 1
Pages45-63
Abstract

This article reports on an experimental study of Russian possible words formed via two productive derivational patterns, namely deadjectival verbs prefixed in o- and u- like ovnešnit’ ‘externalize’ and ukonkretit’ ‘concretize’, obytovit’ ‘vulgarize’ and ukrasivit’ ‘make prettier’. We test four hypotheses as to whether acceptability scores of these verbs correlate with a) corpus frequency and word status; b) productivity of derivational pattern; c) speaker’s age, and d) speaker’s gender. We collected acceptability judgments from 121 native Russian speakers. The study compared low frequency marginal verbs to high frequency verbs on the one hand and nonce verbs on the other hand. Our findings suggest that in perception of possible words, frequency of use is a stronger factor than speakers’ ability to unpack morphological patterns.

Keywordsacceptability judgments, experiment, marginal words, possible words, prefixes, Russian, verbs
Received02.07.2018
Publication date02.07.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1347

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Vinogradov 1972 — Vinogradov V. V. Russkii yazyk [The Russian language]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1972.

2. Glazanova 2000 — Glazanova E. V. The procedure of lexical-semantic study using the method of magnitude estimation and its reliability. Vestnik molodykh uchenykh. 2000. No. 2. Pp. 44—50.

3. Glazanova 2001 — Glazanova E. V. Tipy svyazei v mental’nom leksikone i eksperimental’nye metody ikh issledovaniya. Kand. diss. [Types of connections in the mental lexicon and experimental methods of their investigation. Cand. diss.]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Univ., 2001.

4. Goroshko 1996 — Goroshko E. I. Osobennosti muzhskogo i zhenskogo verbal’nogo povedeniya (psikholingvisticheskii analiz). Kand. diss. [Special aspects of masculine and feminine verbal behavior (a psycholinguistic study). Cand. diss.]. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1996.

5. Dotsenko 2000 — Dotsenko T. I. The impact of gender on the teenager’s inner lexicon. Russkii yazyk segodnya. No. 1. Krysin L.P. (ed). Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2000. Pp. 78—85.

6. Zakharova 2013 — Zakharova O. S. The relation between the terms “occasional word” and “potential word”. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser. Lingvistika. 2013. No. 3. Pp. 14—26.

7. Zemskaya 1972 — Zemskaya E. A. Occasional and potential words in the Russian word-formation. Aktual’nye problemy russkogo slovoobrazovaniya. Samarkand: Samarkand State Univ. Publ., 1972. Pp. 19—28.

8. Zemskaya 1981 — Zemskaya E. A. Word-formation. Sovremennyi russkii yazyk. Beloshapkova V. A. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

9. Zemskaya 1992 — Zemskaya E. A. Slovoobrazovanie kak deyatel’nost’ [Word-formation as an activity]. Moscow: Nauka, 1992.

10. Zemskaya et al. 1993 — Zemskaya E. A., Kitaigorodskaya M. A., Rozanova N. N. Distinctive characteristics of men’s and women’s speech. Russkii yazyk v ego funktsionirovanii. Kommunikativnopragmaticheskii aspekt. Moscow: Nauka, 1993. Pp. 90—137.

11. Krongauz 1998 — Krongauz M. A. Pristavki i glagoly v russkom yazyke: semanticheskaya grammatika [Prefixes and verbs in Russian: Semantic grammar]. Moscow: Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury, 1998.

12. Krysin 2007 — Krysin L. P. Norms of the Russian literary language and actual use in spoken discourse. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii. 2007. No. 2(14). Pp. 5—17.

13. Lopatin 1973 — Lopatin V. V. Rozhdenie slova. Neologizmy i okkazional’nye slova [How words are born. Neologisms and occasional words]. Moscow: Nauka, 1973.

14. Lykov 1976 — Lykov A. G. Sovremennaya russkaya leksikologiya (russkoe okkazional’noe slovo) [Modern Russian lexicology (the Russian occasional word)]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1976.

15. Mel’chuk 1998 — Mel’chuk I. A. Kurs obshchei morfologii [A course of general morphology]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Vienna: Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury, 1998.

16. Musatov 2010 — Musatov V. N. Russkii yazyk. Morfemika. Morfonologiya. Slovoobrazovanie [The Russian language. Morphemics. Morphonology. Word formation]. Moscow: Flinta, 2010.

17. NKRYa — Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National Corpus]. Available at: http://www.ruscorpora.ru.

18. Petrukhina E. V. Formation of new words in Russian: Theoretical aspects and cognitive discourse analysis. Slavische Wortbildung im Vergleich. Theoretische und pragmatische Aspekte. Slavica Varia Halensia. Bd. 12. Mengel S. (ed.). Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2014. Pp. 417—435.

19. RG 1980 — Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar]: In 2 vol. Vol. I. Shvedova N. Yu. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1980.

20. Rozental’, Telenkova 2008 — Rozental’ D. E., Telenkova M. A. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov [A dictionary of linguistic terms]. Minsk: Oniks, 2008.

21. Ulukhanov 1996 — Ulukhanov I. S. Edinitsy slovoobrazovatel’noi sistemy russkogo yazyka i ikh leksicheskaya realizatsiya [Units of the Russian word-formation system and their lexical realization]. Moscow: Russkie Slovari, 1996.

22. G. Falin, A. Falin 2011 — Falin G. I., Falin A. I. Quartiles in descriptive statistics. Matematika. 2011. No. 15. Pp. 8—14.

23. Fedorova 2013 — Fedorova O. V. Experimental syntax and а syntactic experiment in linguistics. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 2013. No. 1. Pp. 3—21.

24. Fel’dman 1957 — Fel’dman N. I. Occasional words and lexicography. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 1957. No. 4. Pp. 64—73.

25. Khanpira 1972 — Khanpira E. Occasional elements in modern spoken language. Stilisticheskie issledovaniya. A collection of articles. Moscow: Moscow State Univ. Publ., 1972. Pp. 245—318.

26. Endresen 2013 — Endresen A. A. Distinct morphemes or allomorphs? Morphological status of the Russian prefixes o- and ob- in the light of the new data: Corpus and experiment. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 2013. No. 6. Pp. 33—69.

27. Andrews 2003 — Andrews D. R. Gender effects in a Russian and American matched-guise study: A sociolinguistic comparison. Russian Linguistics. 2003. Vol. 27. Pp. 287—311.

28. Baayen 2008 — Baayen R. H. Analysing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008.

29. Baayen, Lieber 1991 — Baayen R. H., Lieber R. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics. 1991. Vol. 29. No. 5. Pp. 801—844.

30. Baayen et al. 2013 — Baayen R. H., Janda L. A., Nesset T., Endresen A., Makarova A. Making choices in Slavic: Pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Russian Linguistics. 2013. Vol. 37 (Space and time in Russian temporal expressions). Pp. 253—291.

31. Bard et al. 1996 — Bard E. G., Robertson D., Sorace A. Magnitude Estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language. 1996. Vol. 72. No. 1. Pp. 32—68.

32. Barđdal 2008 — Barđdal J. Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2008.

33. Bermel, Knittl 2012 — Bermel N., Knittl L. Corpus frequency and acceptability judgments: A study of morphosyntactic variants in Czech. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 2012. Vol. 8. No. 2. Pp. 241—275.

34. Dąbrowska 2010 — Dąbrowska E. Naive vs. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review. 2010. Vol. 27. Pp. 1—23.

35. Eisikovits 1998 — Eisikovits E. Girl-talk / Boy-talk: Sex differences in adolescent speech. Language and gender: A reader. Coates J. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. Pp. 42—55.

36. Endresen 2014 — Endresen A. Non-standard allomorphy in Russian prefixes: Corpus, experimental, and statistical exploration. Doct. diss. Tromsø: University of Tromsø: The Arctic University of Norway, 2014. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10037/7098.

37. Endresen, Janda 2016 — Endresen A., Janda L. A. Five statistical models for Likert-type experimental data on acceptability judgments. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 2. Pp. 217—250.

38. Keller 2000 — Keller F. Gradience in grammar: Experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality. Doct. diss. Univ. of Edinburgh, 2000.

39. Labov 1972 — Labov W. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.

40. Lakoff, Johnson 1980 — Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980.

41. Langacker 1999 — Langacker R. W. A dynamic usage-based model. Usage-based models of language. Barlow M., Kemmer S. (eds.). Stanford (CA): CSLI Publications, 1999. Pp. 1—64.

42. Lavrakas 2008 — Lavrakas P. J. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2008.

43. Levin 1993 — Levin B. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1993.

44. Likert 1932 — Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Doct. diss. Columbia University. Series “Archives of Psychology”. 1932. Vol. 140. New York: The Science Press. Pp. 1—55.

45. Nilsen Márkus 2015 — Nilsen Márkus A. Taming the Hungarian (in)transitivity zoo. Undiagnosed species and a complete derivation of the morphological patterns. Doct. diss. Tromsø: University of Tromsø: The Arctic University of Norway, 2015. Available at: http://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/8274

46. R Core Team 2015 — R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.

47. Schütze 1996 — Schütze C. T. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgements and linguistic methodology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1996.

48. Strobl et al. 2009 — Strobl C., Tutz G., Malley J. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods. 2009. Vol. 14. No. 4. Pp. 323—348.

49. Tagliamonte, Baayen 2012 — Tagliamonte S. A., Baayen R. H. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was / were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change. 2012. Vol. 24. No. 2. Pp. 135—178.

50. Taylor 2012 — Taylor J. R. The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford Linguistics, 2012.

51. Townsend 1968 — Townsend C. E. Russian word-formation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.

52. Trudgill 1972 — Trudgill P. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society. 1972. Vols. 1, 2. Pp. 179—195.

53. Wolfram 1969 — Wollfram W. A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro Speech. Urban Language Series. Vol. 5. Washington (DC): Center for applied linguistics, 1969.

54. Yokoyama 1999 — Yokoyama O. Russian genderlects and referential expressions. Language in Society. 1999. Vol. 28. Pp. 401—429.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up