All
 
|
 
 


THE TRIAL OF THE VICTORIOUS GENERALS AND “ALCIBIADES’ SHADOW” (PART I)
 
PIIS032103910030218-2-1
DOI10.31857/S032103910030218-2
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
Igor Surikov 
Occupation: chief researcher
Affiliation: Institute of World History, RAS
Address: Moscow, Leninskiy prosp. 32a, Moscow, Russia, 119334
Abstract

The trial of the generals who won the Arginusae sea battle of 406 B.C. was one of the most scandalous episodes of the history of Classical Athens. The event has been more than once treated in scholarly literature, but a number of its aspects still need clearing up. The first part of the article begins with a historiographical excursus; in particular, D. Gish’s recent large study, which is completely devoted to the process, is examined in most detail and its serious shortcomings are pointed out. Then follows an analysis (the most profound of all that have been undertaken) of the prosopographical data concerning members of the board of generals in 407–406 B.C. The fact is emphasized, among others, that the military leaders subject to the trial were elected to replace Alcibiades who was removed from the position of strategos autokrator in much degree under the influence of emotions.

KeywordsClassical Greece, Athens, Peloponnesian War, generals, the Arginusae battle, Alcibiades, Theramenes, democracy, oligarchy, prosopography
AcknowledgmentGrant of RSF № 23-28-00024
Received08.03.2024
Number of characters68290
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register. 
1. Adeleye, G. 1977/1978: The Arginusai Trial and Theramenes’ Rejection at the Dokimasia of 405/404 B.C. Museum Africanum 6, 94–99.
2. Andrewes, A. 1953: The Generals in the Hellespont, 410–407 B.C. Journal of Hellenic Studies 73, 2–9.
3. Andrewes, A. 1974: The Arginousai Trial. Phoenix 28/1, 112–122.
4. Asmonti, L. 2006: The Arginusae Trial, the Changing Role of Strategoi and the Relationship between Demos and Military Leadership in Late Fifth-Century Athens. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 49, 1–21.
5. Asmonti, L. 2015: Conon the Athenian: Warfare and Politics in the Aegean, 414–386 B.C. Stuttgart.
6. Barber, G.L. 1935: The Historian Ephorus. London.
7. Buck, R.J. 1994: Boiotia and the Boiotian League, 432–371 B.C. Edmonton.
8. Buck, R.J. 1998: Thrasybulus and the Athenian Democracy: The Life of an Athenian Statesman. Stuttgart.
9. Burckhardt, L. 2000: Eine Demokratie wohl, aber kein Rechtsstaat? Der Arginusenprozeß des Jahres 406 v.Chr. In: L. Burckhardt, J. von Ungern-Sternberg (eds.), Große Prozesse im antiken Athen. München, 128–143.
10. Carawan, E. 2007: The Trial of the Arginousai Generals and the Dawn of “Judicial Review”. Dike 10, 19–56.
11. Cloché, P. 1919: L’affaire des Arginuses. Revue historique 130, 5–68.
12. Delebecque, E. 1957: Essai sur la vie de Xenophon. Paris.
13. Develin, R. 2003: Athenian Officials 684–321 B.C. Cambridge.
14. Due, B. 1983: The Trial of the Generals in Xenophon’s Hellenica. Classica et mediaevalia 34, 33–44.
15. Finley, M.I. 1971: The Ancestral Constitution. Cambridge.
16. Finley, M.I. 1983: Politics in the Ancient World. Cambridge.
17. Fornara, C.W. 1971: The Athenian Board of Generals from 501 to 404. Wiesbaden.
18. Frank, J., Monoson, S.S. 2009: Lived Excellence in Aristotle’s Constitution of Athens: Why the Encomium of Theramenes Matters. In: S. Salkever (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Political Thought. Cambridge, 243–270.
19. Gish, D. 2012: Defending dēmokratia: Athenian Justice and the Trial of the Arginusae Generals in Xenophon’s Hellenica. In: F. Hobden, C. Tuplin (eds.), Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry. Leiden; Boston, 161–212.
20. Hatzfeld, J. 1940: Socrate au procès des Arginuses. Revue des études anciennes 42, 165–171.
21. Hunt P. 2001: The Slaves and the Generals of Arginusae. American Journal of Philology 122/3, 359–380.
22. Joyce, C.J. 2022: Amnesty and Reconciliation in Late Fifth-Century Athens: The Rule of Law under Restored Democracy. Edinburgh.
23. Kagan, D. 1987: The Fall of the Athenian Empire. Ithaca.
24. Kagan, D. 2004: The Peloponnesian War. New York.
25. Kaletsch, H. 1999: Kyme [3]. In: H. Cancik, H. Schneider (eds.), Der neue Pauly: Enzyklopädie der Antike. Bd. 6: Iul – Lee. Stuttgart Weimar, 967–968.
26. Kapellos, A. 2019: Xenophon’s Peloponnesian War. Berlin; Boston.
27. Kirchner, I. 1901: Prosopographia Attica. Vol. 1. Berlin.
28. Kirchner, I. 1903: Prosopographia Attica. Vol. 2. Berlin.
29. Kudryavtseva, T.V. 1999: Politicheskiy protsess v klassicheskikh Afinakh (na primere protsessa strategov-pobediteley) [Political trial in Classical Athens (on the example of the trial of the victorious generals)]. Klio: zhurnal dlya uchenykh [Klio: a journal for scientists] 2 (8), 74–80.
30. Кудрявцева, Т.В. 1999: Политический процесс в классических Афинах (на примере процесса стратегов-победителей). Клио: журнал для ученых 2 (8), 74–80.
31. Kudryavtseva, T.V. 2008: Narodnyy sud v democraticheskikh Afinakh [People’s court in democratic Athens]. St. Petersburg.
32. Кудрявцева, Т.В. 2008: Народный суд в демократических Афинах. СПб.
33. Lang, M. 1992: Theramenes and Arginousai. Hermes 120, 267–279.
34. Lavelle, B.M. 1988: Adikia, the Decree of Kannonos and the Trial of Generals. Classica et mediaevalia 39, 19–41.
35. Lazenby, J.F. 2004: The Peloponnesian War: A Military Study. London; New York.
36. Lintott, A. 1982: Violence, Civil Strife and Revolution in the Classical City, 750–330 B.C. Baltimore.
37. McCoy, W.J. 1975: The Identity of Leon. American Journal of Philology 96, 187–199.
38. McCoy, W.J. 1977: Thrasyllus. American Journal of Philology 98, 264–289.
39. MacDowell, D.M. 1978: The Law in Classical Athens. London.
40. Marcaccini, C. 2013: Rivoluzione oligarchica o restaurazione della democrazia? I Cinquemilia, la πρόκρισις e la patrios politeia. Klio 95/2, 405–428.
41. Mehl, A. 1982: Für eine neue Bewertung eines Justizskandals. Der Arginusenprozess und seine Überlieferung vor dem Hintergrund von Recht und Weltanschauung im Athen des ausgehenden 5. Jh. v.Chr. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 99, 32–80.
42. Nails, D. 2002: The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Indianapolis.
43. Németh, G. 1984: Der Arginusen-Prozess: Die Geschichte eines politischen Justizmordes. Klio 66/1, 51–57.
44. Nicolai, R. 2006: Thucydides Continued. In: A. Rengakos, A. Tsakmakis (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Thucydides. Leiden, 693–719.
45. Nikityuk, E.V. Protsess strategov-pobediteley pri Arginusskikh ostrovakh 406 g. do n.e. i krizis afinskoy demokratii [The trial of the victorious general of the Arginusae islands, 407 B.C., and the crisis of the Athenian democracy]. Mnemon 5, 223–230.
46. Никитюк, Е.В. 2006: Процесс стратегов-победителей при Аргинусских островах 406 г. до н.э. и кризис афинской демократии. Мнемон 5, 223–230.
47. Ober, J. 2008: Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton.
48. Occhipinti, E. 2016: The Hellenica Oxyrhynchia and Historiography: New Research Perspectives. Leiden; Boston.
49. Osborne, R. 2003: Changing the Discourse. In: K.A. Morgan (ed.), Popular Tyranny: Sovereignty and its Discontents in Ancient Greece. Austin, 251–272.
50. Ostwald, M. 1986: From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law. Law, Society, and Politics in Fifth-Century Athens. Berkeley.
51. Pownall, F. 2000: Shifting Viewpoints in Xenophon’s Hellenica: the Arginusae Episode. Athenaeum 88, 499–513.
52. Quaß, F. 1971: Nomos und Psephisma: Untersuchung zum griechischen Staatsrecht. München.
53. Raaflaub, K.A. 2004: The Discovery of Freedom in Ancient Greece. Chicago.
54. Rhodes, P.J. 1985: A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia. Oxford.
55. Roberts, J.T. 1977: Arginusae Once Again. Classical World 71/2, 107–111.
56. Rubinstein, L. 2004: Aiolis and South-western Mysia. In: M.H. Hansen, T.H. Nielsen (eds.), An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis: An Investigation Conducted by the Copenhagen Polis Centre for the Danish National Research Foundation. Oxford, 1033–1052.
57. Schepens, G. 2012: Timocrates’ Mission to Greece – Once Again. In: F. Hobden, C. Tuplin (eds.), Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry. Leiden; Boston, 213–241.
58. Seager, R. 1967: Alcibiades and the Charge of Aiming at Tyranny. Historia 16/1, 6–18.
59. Surikov, I.E. 2000: Iz istorii grecheskoy aristokratii pozdnearkhaicheskoy i ranneklassicheskoy epokh: Rod Alkmeonidov v politicheskoy zhizni Afin VII–V vv. do n.e. [From the history of Greek aristocracy in the Late Archaic and Early Classical periods: The family of Alcmeonids in the political life of the 7th to 5th century B.C. Athens]. Moscow.
60. Суриков, И.Е. 2000: Из истории греческой аристократии позднеархаической и раннеклассической эпох: Род Алкмеонидов в политической жизни Афин VII–V вв. до н.э. М.
61. Surikov, I.E. 2022: Gellanik i Andokid [Hellanicus and Andocides]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of ancient history] 82/2, 303–318.
62. Суриков, И.Е. 2022: Гелланик и Андокид. Вестник древней истории 82/2, 303–318.
63. Taylor, M.C. 2002: Implicating the Demos: A Reading of Thucydides on the Rise of the Four Hundred. Journal of Hellenic Studies 122, 91–108.
64. Tritle, L. 2010: A New History of the Peloponnesian War. Oxford.
65. Ungern-Sternberg, J. von 2000: ‘Die Revolution frißt ihre eignen Kinder’: Kritias vs. Theramenes. In: L. Burckhardt, J. von Ungern-Sternberg (eds.), Große Prozesse im antiken Athen. München, 144–156.
66. Wedel, W. von 1971: Die politischen Prozesse im Athen des fünften Jahrhundert. Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklung der attischen Demokratie zum Rechtsstaat. Bullettino dell’Istituto di diritto romano “Vittorio Scialoja” 13, 107–188.
67. Worthington, I. 1989: Aristophanes’ ‘Frogs’ and Arginusae. Hermes 117/3, 359–363.
68. Yunis, H., 1996: Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens. Ithaca.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up