On the Camels of the Aorsi: Dioscorides and the Medicine Trade of the Bosporan Kingdom. Part I. The “Soldier’s Life” of Dioscorides

 
PIIS032103910014829-4-1
DOI10.31857/S032103910014829-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: University of Exeter
Address: Exeter, UK
Journal nameVestnik drevnei istorii
EditionVolume 81 Issue 2
Pages394-407
AbstractWe know only a little about the life of Dioscorides, a medical botanist who wrote in the first century AD or so. His reference to his “soldier’s life” has been important in reconstructions of his activities, often linked with campaigns in Armenia under Nero. However, a “soldier’s life” was a common enough metaphor in the first century AD for a life of hard work, which need have no connection at all to military service. His work shows scant knowledge of the Caucasus. The evidence for his dates makes it likely that he wrote after AD 77, when Pliny the Elder completed his Natural History, in which Dioscorides’ important work is not mentioned. Therefore, his remarks on the Bosporan Kingdom were made after AD 77.
KeywordsDioscorides, ancient pharmacology, ancient botany, medicine, Corbulo, Ephesus, Laecanius
Publication date28.06.2021
Number of characters40413
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной
1 Among the most influential creations of the ancient world is Dioscorides’ book on plants and minerals useful in medicine (written in Greek, but usually known by its Latinized name, De materia medica). For obvious reasons it has been studied almost exclusively by scholars concerned with ancient medicine. In the present discussion I have two principal concerns: both have been rather marginal to a great deal of that medical scholarship, but they seem to me to be of prime importance to the history of the Black Sea region. My first concern here is the biography of Dioscorides himself, about which we know little that is not in his own book. This matters for many reasons, but my principal interest is to get a better sense of the research methods and contexts of our author, not least with regard to the Black Sea and Caucasus. I shall seek also to refine his dates: while there is general agreement that he wrote in the first century AD, I argue that a date towards the end of that century is to be considered and preferred. My second concern, to be pursued on that basis in the second part of this article, will be to examine his comments on the Bosporan kingdom, in particular, and more generally on the northern Black Sea region as a source of medical materials, both from local sources and from as far afield as the Caspian Sea and even India. For Dioscorides shows us that there was a “spice trade”1 in the Bosporus, involving goods brought across the steppe that stretches between the Black and Caspians Seas north of the main range of the Caucasus. This neglected aspect of Bosporan trade demonstrates that grain was by no means the only export from the kingdom, while it also suggests that “spices” probably played a part in the Bosporans’ dealings with their non-Greek neighbours. 1. I retain the familiar term: here, as usual, it embraces much more than food flavourings, as we shall see.
2 Dioscorides addresses his work to a certain Arius. We know Arius as a pharmacological specialist of Tarsus; our author evidently expects his readers to know the great man2. Arius moved in the highest circles, for he was connected with an important family in his world. In his Preface Dioscorides holds forth on the close relationship of mutual friendship between Arius and a Laecanius Bassus: thanks to Galen we know that Arius had his Roman citizenship through the Laecanii, so that in Roman terms he was (C. ?) Laecanius Arius3. The Laecanius Bassus mentioned by Dioscorides is usually identified as the consul ordinarius of AD 64, the momentous year of the great fire in Neronian Rome (Tac. Ann. 15. 33. 1). Fortunately, the identification is of only marginal interest for the present discussion, since it is hardly as secure as often imagined. Among other possibilities there was the father of that consul, with the same name, who himself held consular office in AD 40 (ILS 6102). The family remained at the top under the Flavians, where we know of another Laecanius Bassus. This was C. Laecanius Bassus Caecina Paetus, who had been adopted by the consul of 64. He became proconsul of Asia and left his mark at Ephesus in AD 80/81, where he apparently constructed an enormous nymphaeum, with abundant sculpture to adorn it4. Ephesus was one of the great cities of the Roman world, with many attractions for doctors and other men of culture5. In any event, Arius had a powerful associate, though we need not take all Dioscorides’ words at face value. For, while the patron-client relationship was usually couched in the language of mutual friendship, in this particular relationship the complete superiority of his Laecanius Bassus was beyond doubt6. 2. Scarborough 2008.

3. Galen gives the nomen (De comp. med. gen. 13. 840 K).

4. On the many Laecanii, who came from Pola (Istria), where their amphora production has received close attention, see Tassaux 1982; cf. Eck 1982 on C. Laecanius Bassus Caecina Paetus, a Flavian proconsul of Asia, with Thomas 2014, 75–77 on his great fountain at Ephesus; cf. Rathmayr 2011 on its sculptures. Earlier, the elder Pliny twice mentions a consular Laecanius Bassus died in a way that suggests a lack of medical support (NH 26. 5, with 36. 203), but we do not know which one: the consul of AD 64 is usually imagined (e.g. Scarborough 2008, 129), possibly correctly. Galba’s possible killer is a still more elusive Laecanius: Plut. Galba 27. 2.

5. For doctors and medicine there, see Nutton 2008, 140–143; Zimonyi 2014.

6. Cf. Saller 1982.
3 The same may be said of Dioscorides’ relationship with Arius, who is often (and possibly rightly)7 understood to be Dioscorides’ teacher at Tarsus. The fact that our author dedicates his book to Arius confirms their bond, while his treatment of Arius makes it clear enough that Dioscorides had benefited from Arius’ support and, in some sense, patronage. Of particular interest is Dioscorides’ mention of the time he spent in the company of Arius and Laecanius Bassus, where he claims to have observed their mutual friendship (which might entail their residence together, perhaps at the house of Bassus, whether in Rome, Ephesus or elsewhere). Of course, such an observation was very much to the benefit of Arius, and so very welcome to the dedicatee, while at the same time our author shows himself among the exalted. For we have here a chain of patronage, which we may express in a fashion that ancient manners would have tended to avoid: this was a hierarchy of patronage, with Dioscorides as client of Arius, and Arius as client of Bassus. While Dioscorides locates himself in the extended circle of mighty Bassus, he makes no claim to any direct connection with the great man: his association is through Arius, at least as far as the Preface of his book is concerned. We can only guess where the three had been together, for how long and under what circumstances, most likely in Rome or Asia Minor. After all, Dioscorides claims to have travelled extensively in his quest for a knowledge that came from autopsy and experience, not only from the written word and received wisdom. Clearly, our travelling author did not stay in his native Cilicia, neither at Anazarbus his birthplace nor at Tarsus, probably his place of education in medicine. 7. One might have wished for some clear indication of Arius as teacher in the Preface.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 324

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Akhalkatsi, M. 2019: Plant Species in Natura 2000 Habitats in Georgia. Tbi-lisi.

2. Aparaschivei, D. 2010: Being a physician in Moesia Inferior. Dacia 54, 141–156.

3. Bader, P. 2014: The identity, legal status and origin of the Roman army’s medical staff in the imperial age. In: B. Maire (ed.), ‘Greek’ and ‘Ro-man’ in Latin Medical Writing: Studies in Cultural Change and Ex-change in Ancient Medicine. Leiden, 43–59.

4. Beck, L. 2005: Pedanius Dioscorides of Anazarbus, “De materia medica”. Hildesheim.

5. Bonner, C. 1922: A papyrus of Dioscurides in the University of Michigan collection. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 53, 142–168.

6. Bourdin, S., D’Ercole, V. (eds.) 2014: I Vestini e il loro territorio dalla preis-toria al medioevo. Rome.

7. Brouwer, R. 2014: The Stoic Sage: The Early Stoics on Wisdom, Sagehood and Socrates. New York.

8. Cassia, M. 2018: Servilio Damocrate: un medico poeta alla corte giulioclau-dia? Historika 8, 237–256.

9. De Romanis, F. 2020: The Indo-Roman Pepper Trade and the Muziris Papy-rus. Oxford.

10. Denham, A. 2018: Dioscorides’ legacy: a classical precursor to travellers in Ottoman lands. In: I. Aščerić-Todd, S. Knees, J. Starkey, P. Starkey (eds.), Travellers in Ottoman Lands: The Botanical Legacy. Oxford, 89–108.

11. Denham, A., Whitelegg, M. 2014: Deciphering Dioscorides: mountains and molehills? In: S. Francia, A. Stobart (eds.), Critical Approaches to the History of Western Herbal Medicine: From Classical Antiquity to the Early Modern Period. London, 191–209.

12. Duff, T.E. 1999: Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford.

13. Duff, T.E. 2004: Plato, tragedy, the ideal reader and Plutarch’s “Demetrius and Antony”. Hermes 132/3, 271–291.

14. Eck, W. 1982 Jahres- und Provinzialfasten der senatorischen Statthalter von 69/70 bis 138/39. Chiron 12, 281–362.

15. Eck, W. 1983 Jahres- und Provinzialfasten der senatorischen Statthalter von 69/70 bis 138/39. Chiron 13, 147–238.

16. Fantham, E. Hine, H.M., Ker, J., Williams G.D. 2014: Lucius Annaeus Sene-ca: Hardship and Happiness. Chicago.

17. Flemming, R., Hanson, A.E. 2001: Dioscorides, De materia medica II. 76. 2 and 76. 7–18. In: I. Andorlini (ed.), Greek Medical Papyri. Vol. I. Flor-ence, 9–35.

18. Fortenbaugh, W.W., Sharples, R.W. 1988: Theophrastean Studies: Fifteen Papers on Natural Science, Physics and Metaphysics, Ethics, Religion, and Rhetoric. New Brunswick–Oxford.

19. Gowers, E. 2011: The road to Sicily: Lucilius to Seneca. Ramus 40, 168–197.

20. Hardy, G., Totelin, L. 2016: Ancient Botany. London–New York.

21. Holleran, C. 2012: Shopping in Ancient Rome: The Retail Trade in the Late Republic and the Principate. Oxford.

22. Houston, G.W. 2003: Galen, his books, and the “Horrea Piperataria” at Rome. Memoirs of the American Academy at Rome 48, 45–51.

23. Jouanna, J. 2012: Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen. Leiden.

24. Keyser, P.T. 2008: Pamphilos of Alexandria. In: P.T. Keyser, G.L. Irby-Massie (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Ancient Natural Scientists: The Greek Tradition and Its Many Heirs. London–New York, 606–607.

25. Kokkinia, C. 2007: A rhetorical riddle: the subject of Dio Chrysostom’s “First Tarsian Oration”. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 103, 407–422.

26. Lavery, G.B. 1980: Metaphors of war and travel in Seneca’s prose works. Greece and Rome 27/2, 147–157.

27. McKeown, J.C. 1995: Militat omnis amans. Classical Journal 90/3, 295–304.

28. Monoson, S. 2016: Socrates’ military service. In: V. Caston, S.-M. Weineck (eds.), Our Ancient Wars: Rethinking War through the Classics. Ann Arbor, 96–118.

29. Montiglio, S. 2000: Wandering philosophers in classical Greece. Journal of Hellenic Studies 120, 86–105.

30. Montiglio, S. 2006: Should the aspiring wise man travel? A conflict in Sene-ca’s thought. American Journal of Philology 127/4, 553–586.

31. Nussbaum, M.C. 1994: The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hel-lenistic Ethics. Princeton.

32. Nutton, V. 1977: Archiatri and the medical profession in antiquity. Papers of the British School at Rome 45, 191–226.

33. Nutton, V. 1985: The drug trade in antiquity. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 78, 138–145.

34. Nutton, V. 2008: The medical world of Rufus of Ephesus. In: P.E. Pormann (ed.), Rufus of Ephesus: On Melancholy. (Sapere, 12). Tübingen, 139–158.

35. Nutton, V. 2013: Ancient medicine. London.

36. Ogden, D. 2001: Greek and Roman Necromancy. Princeton.

37. Pelling, C.B.R. (ed.) 1988: Plutarch. Life of Antony. Cambridge.

38. Pelling, C.B.R. 1989: Plutarch: Roman heroes and Greek culture. In: M. Griffin, J. Barnes (eds.), Philosophia togata. Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford, 199–232.

39. Pelling, C.B.R. 1995: The moralism of Plutarch’s “Lives”. In: D.C. Innes, H. Hine, C.B.R. Pelling (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for D. Russell on His 75th Birthday. Oxford, 205–220.

40. Rathmayr, E. 2011: Die Skulpturenausstattung des C. Laecanius Bassus Nymphaeum in Ephesos. In: F. D’Andria, I. Romeo (eds.), Roman Sculpture in Asia Minor. Proceedings of the International Conference to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Italian excavations at Hierapolis in Phrygia, held on May 24–26, 2007, in Cavallino (Lecce). (Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series, 80). Portsmouth, 130–149.

41. Reckford, K.J. 2009: Recognizing Persius. (Martin Classical Lectures, 23). Princeton.

42. Rood, T. 2011: Black Sea variations: Arrian’s “Periplus”. Cambridge Clas-sical Journal 57, 137–163.

43. Saller, R. 1982: Personal Patronage Under the Early Empire. Cambridge.

44. Scarborough, J. 2006: More on Dioscorides’ Etruscan herbs. Etruscan News 6, 1, 9.

45. Scarborough, J. 2008: Areios of Tarsos, Laecanius. In: P.T. Keyser, G.L. Ir-by-Massie (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Ancient Natural Scientists: The Greek Tradition and Its Many Heirs. London–New York, 128–129.

46. Scarborough, J. 2012: Thornapple in Graeco-Roman pharmacology. Classi-cal Philology 107/3, 247–255.

47. Scarborough, J. 2020: Dioscorides on beavers. In: L.M.V. Totelin, R. Flem-ming (eds.), Medicine and Markets in the Graeco-Roman World and Beyond: Essays on Ancient Medicine in Honour of V. Nutton. Swansea, 37–40.

48. Scarborough, J., Fernandes, A. 2011: Ancient medicinal use of aristolochia: birthwort’s tradition and toxicity. Pharmacy in History 53/1, 3–21.

49. Scarborough, J., Nutton, V. 1982: The preface of Dioscorides’ “Materia Medica”: introduction, translation, and commentary. Transactions and Studies of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia: Medicine and His-tory 4, 187–227.

50. Schofield, M. 1999: The Stoic Idea of the City. Revised ed. Chicago.

51. Swain, S. 2008: Social stress and political pressure: “On Melancholy” in context. In: P.E. Pormann (ed.), Rufus of Ephesus: On Melancholy. (Sapere, 12). Tübingen, 113–138.

52. Syme, R. 1970: Domitius Corbulo. Journal of Roman Studies 60, 27–39.

53. Syme, R. 1995: Anatolica: Studies in Strabo. Oxford.

54. Tassaux, F. 1982: Laecanii. Recherches sur une famille sénatoriale d’Istrie. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome 94, 227–269.

55. Thomas, E. 2014: On the Sublime in architecture. In: J. Elsner, M. Meyer (eds.), Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge, 37–88.

56. Tobyn, G., Denham, A., Whitelegg, M. 2011: The Western Herbal Tradition: 2000 Years of Medicinal Plant Knowledge. Edinburgh.

57. Touwaide, A. 1999: La botanique entre science et culture au 1er siècle de notre ère. In: G. Wöhrle (ed.), Biologie. (Geschichte der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften der Antike, 1). Stuttgart, 219–252.

58. Trapp, M.B. 1997: Maximus of Tyre: The Philosophical Orations. Oxford.

59. Verhoogt, A. 2017: Discarded, Discovered, Collected: The University of Michigan Papyrus Collection. Ann Arbor.

60. Wellmann, M. 1898: Die Pflanzennamen des Dioskurides. Hermes 33/3, 360–422.

61. Wellmann, M. 1916: Pamphilos. Hermes 51/1, 1–64.

62. Zimonyi, A. 2014: The context of medical competitions in Ephesus. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 54/4, 355–370.

63. Zimonyi, A. 2017: The cobbler turned doctor: identifying physicians in the Roman Empire during the Principate. In: D. Bajnok (ed.), Alia Miscel-lanea Antiquitatum. Budapest, 215–234.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up