S.A. Zhebelev in the System  of Soviet Science (Based on New Archival Findings). Part III. 1932–1940

Occupation: Senior Lecturer of the Department of Museum and Monument Protection of the Saint Petersburg State University
Affiliation:
Institute of World History RAS
St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Mikhail Bukharin

Occupation: Senior Research Fellow; Department for Comparative Study of Ancient Civilizations
Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation

Journal name

Vestnik drevnei istorii

Edition

Volume 81 Issue 1

Pages

198-210

Abstract

By the beginning of the 1930s the relations of S. A. Zhebelev with the Soviet State had endured a serious crisis during the so-called “case of the academicians”. Zhebelev, not having accepted either Marxist historical doctrine, or the “new linguistic teaching”, thus became distant from both his colleagues and from the heads of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR and GAIMK, S. F. Oldenburg and N. Ya. Marr. S. A. Zhebelev’s works at the beginning of the 1930s on the interpretation of the Chersonesitan decree in honour of Diophantus (IOSPE I2 352), however, unexpectedly answered the needs of the Soviet historical research and radically changed Zhebelev’s position. The article based on a significant range of archival sources analyzes the circumstances of the historian’s gradual entry into the сircle of classics of the Soviet ancient historical studies.

Keywords

ancient history, Classical studies, science history, archives, S. A. Zhebelev, S. Ya. Luria, A. I. Boltunova, M. I. Maximova, scientific institutes, Academy of Sciences of the USSR

Acknowledgment

Russian Science Foundation, project no. 18-18-00367

Received

13.08.2020

Publication date

29.03.2021

Number of characters

32244

Cite

GOST	Ananiev V., Bukharin M. S.A. Zhebelev in the System of Soviet Science (Based on New Archival Findings). Part III. 1932–1940 // Vestnik drevnei istorii – 2021. – V. 81. – Issue 1 C. 198-210 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vdi/s032103910013529-4-1-en (circulation date: 05.11.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S032103910013529-4
MLA	Ananiev, Vitaliy G, Bukharin, Mikhail "S.A. Zhebelev in the System of Soviet Science (Based on New Archival Findings). Part III. 1932–1940." Vestnik drevnei istorii 81.1 (2021):198-210. DOI: 10.31857/S032103910013529-4
APA	Ananiev V., Bukharin M. (2021). S.A. Zhebelev in the System of Soviet Science (Based on New Archival Findings). Part III. 1932–1940. Vestnik drevnei istorii 81(1), pp.198-210 DOI: 10.31857/S032103910013529-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1218

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alpatov, V.M. Istoriya odnogo mifa: Marr i marrizm (nachalo). Znanie – sila 11, 65–69. 1990.

2. Alpatov, V.M. Istoriya odnogo mifa. Marr i marrizm. 2-e izd. M. 2004.

3. Anan'ev, V.G., Bukharin, M.D. S.A. Zhebelyov v sisteme sovetskoj nauki (po materialam novykh arkhivnykh dokumentov). Chast' II. 1927‒1932. VDI 80/3, 753‒774. 2020.

4. Bukharin, M.D., Karpyuk, S.G. Kak sozdavalsya Institut vseobschej istorii RAN. Vestnik RAN 11 (89), 1162‒1169. 2019.

5. Gavrilov, A.K. Skify Savmaka – vosstanie ili vtorzhenie? (IPE I2 352–Syll.3 709). V sb.: A.K. Gavrilov (red.), Ehtyudy po antichnoj istorii i kul'ture Severnogo Prichernomor'ya. SPb., 53–73. 1992.

6. Gavrilov, A.K. 1996: Das Diophantosdekret und Strabon. Hyperboreus 2/1, 151–168.

7. Gavrilov, A.K. 2016: Noch ein epigraphischer Beleg für den Skythen Saumakos (IosPE I2 353)? Hyperboreus 22/2, 276–287.

8. Krikh, S.B. «Revolyutsiya rabov» v otechestvennoj istoriografii 30-kh gg. XX veka. Dialog so vremenem: al'manakh intellektual'noj istorii 17, 224–236. 2006.

9. Krikh, S.B., Metel', O.V. Istoriografiya drevnosti v sovetskij period: uchebnoe posobie. Omsk. 2018.

10. Lenin, V.I. Gosudarstvo i revolyutsiya. Uchenie marksizma o gosudarstve i zadachi proletariata v revolyutsii. (Polnoe sobranie sochinenij. T. 33). 5-e izd. M. 1969.

11. Lur'e, Ya.S. Istoriya odnoj zhizni. SPb. 2004.

12. Marks, K. Kapital. Kritika politicheskoj ehkonomii. T. I. Protsess proizvodstva kapitala. M. 1960.

13. Mirovschikova, A.A. Mezhdu «staroj» i «novoj» naukoj: put' S.Ya. Lur'e v perelomnoe dlya Rossii vremya (vtoraya polovina 10-kh – nachalo 30-kh godov XX veka). Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki» 159/4, 910–924. 2017.

14. Mishulin, A.V. Ocherk o Kitae v antichnuyu ehpokhu. Bor'ba klassov. Na fronte istoricheskoj nauki 2, 95–105. 1936.

15. Serova, E.A. Istoriko-arkheograficheskij institut Akademii nauk SSSR (1931–1936). V sb.: M.V. Nechkina (red.), Istoriya i istoriki. Istoriograficheskij ezhegodnik. 1976. M., 361–378. 1979.

16. Skachkov, P.E., Chizhikova, K.L. Bibliografiya trudov S.F. Ol'denburga. V sb.: G.K. Skryabin, E.M. Primakov (red.), Sergej Fedorovich Ol'denburg. M., 122–153. 1986.

17. Zhebelyov, S.A. Uchenye stepeni v ikh proshlom, vozrozhdenie ikh v nastoyaschem i grozyaschaya opasnost' ikh vyrozhdeniya v buduschem (Publikatsiya i primechaniya I.V. Tunkinoj: Iz nauchnogo naslediya: zapiska o prisuzhdenii uchenykh stepenej S.A. Zhebelyova). Ocherki istorii otechestvennoj arkheologii III, 142–195. 2002.

18. Zhebelyov, S.A., Kovalev, S.I. Antichnyj sposob proizvodstva v istochnikakh. Literaturnye, ehpigraficheskie i papirologicheskie svidetel'stva o sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoj istorii drevnej Gretsii, ehllinisticheskogo Vostoka i Rima. L. 1933.