Res divinae and res saeculares in the Perception of Pope Leo the Great: On the Prehistory of the Gelasian Theory

The article deals with two concepts present in the writings of Pope Leo the Great (440–461): ‘divine matters’ (res divinae), which, according to the pope, belong to the Church and are managed by priests, and ‘secular matters’ (res saeculares), which fall under the authority of the Roman emperor. These concepts, the interpretation of which Leo was the first among the Roman pontiffs to provide, were later accepted by one of his successors, Gelasius I (492–496), and laid a foundation for a set of ideas, commonly known as the ‘Gelasian theory’, from which the medieval “two swords theory” evolved. The author discusses the time and political circumstances under which Pope Leo formulated his view on the distinction between ‘secular matters’ and ‘divine matters’. The need to point out the distinction between both spheres arose as a result of the Councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon in 449 and 451 convened by the Eastern emperors Theodosius II (407–450) and Marcianus (450–457), which were unacceptable to the papacy. Pope Leo made the first attempt in the history of the papacy to challenge the imperial decisions taken at these councils, arguing that the competence of the emperor mainly concerned ‘secular matters’, while ‘divine matters’ had a different quality and should be managed by ‘priests’ (sacerdotes). At the same time Pope Leo ignored the powers of the Roman emperor in sacris (in sacred matters), which the latter possessed as a guarantor and performer of public law. The pope’s attempt was not successful: by the end of his pontificate he fully agreed with the emperor’s leading role in ecclesiastical affairs.

Keywords

res divinae, res saeculares, the Gelasian theory, the two swords theory, Pope Leo the Great, Pope Nicolas I, emperor Theodosius II, emperor Marcianus, papal primacy, imperium et sacerdotium

Received

28.12.2020

Publication date

28.12.2020

Number of characters

28280

Cite

GOST	Gratsianskiy M. Res divinae and res saeculares in the Perception of Pope Leo the Great: On the Prehistory of the Gelasian Theory // Vestnik drevnei istorii – 2020. – V. 80. – Issue 4 C. 1103-1114 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vdi/s032103910010638-4-1-en (circulation date: 18.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S032103910010638-4
MLA	Gratsianskiy, Mikhail "Res divinae and res saeculares in the Perception of Pope Leo the Great: On the Prehistory of the Gelasian Theory." Vestnik drevnei istorii 80.4 (2020):1103-1114. DOI: 10.31857/S032103910010638-4
APA	Gratsianskiy M. (2020). Res divinae and res saeculares in the Perception of Pope Leo the Great: On the Prehistory of the Gelasian Theory. Vestnik drevnei istorii 80(4), pp.1103-1114 DOI: 10.31857/S032103910010638-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1142

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Batiffol, P. 1924a: Le siège apostolique (359–451). Paris.

2. Batiffol, P. 1924b: Petrus initium episcopatus. Revue des sciences religieuses 4, 440–453.

3. Benson, R.L. 1982: The Gelasian doctrine: uses and transformations. In: G. Makdisi, D. Sourdel, J. Sourdel-Thomine (eds.), La notion d’autorité au Moyen Age: Islam, Byzance, Occident. Colloques internationaux de La Napoule, session des 23–26 octobre 1978. Paris, 13–44.

4. Berger, A. 1953: Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia.

5. Bishop, J.C. 1980: Pope Nicolas I and the First Age of Papal Independence. PhD Thesis. Columbia University.

6. Blaudeau, Ph. 2012: Between Petrine ideology and Realpolitik. The see of Constantinople in Roman geo-ecclesiology (449–536). In: L. Grig, G. Kelly (eds.), Two Romes. Rome and Constantinople in Late Antiquity. Oxford–New York, 364–384.

7. Borovoi V., 2017: Rim, Konstantinopol’ i khristianskiy Vostok v period «aka-kianskoi skhizmy» (484–518 gg.) [Rome, Constantinople and the Chris-tian Orient during the “Acacian Schism”, 484–518]. Minsk.

8. Bougard, F. 2000: Niccolò I, santo. In: Enciclopedia dei papi. Vol. 2. Roma, 1–22.

9. Bury, J.B. 1931: History of the Later Roman Empire. From the Death of Theodosius I to the Death of Justinian (A.D. 395 to A.D. 565). Vol. 1. London.

10. Caspar, E. 1933: Geschichte des Papsttums. Vol. 2. Tübingen.

11. Caspary, G.E. 1979: Politics and Exegesis: Origen and the Two Swords. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.

12. Dvornik, F. 1951: Emperors, popes, and general councils. Dumbarton Oaks Papers 6, 1–23.

13. Dvornik, F. 1970: The Photian Schism: History and Legend. Cambridge.

14. Dvornik, F. 1974: Photius, Nicholas I and Hadrian II. In: F. Dvornik, Photian and Byzantine Ecclesiastical Studies. London, 33–50.

15. Dyson, R.W. 2009: Medieval Rulers and Political Ideology. In: C. Lansing, Ed.D. English (eds.), A Companion to the Medieval World. London, 354–371.

16. Ensslin, W. 1955: Auctoritas und Potestas. Zur Zweigewaltenlehre des Papstes Gelasius I. Historisches Jahrbuch 74, 661–668.

17. Fichtenau, H. 1957: Arenga. Spätantike und Mittelalter im Spiegel von Urkun-denformeln. Graz–Köln.

18. Field, L.L. 1998: Liberty, Dominion, and the Two Swords: On the Origins of Western Political Theology (180–398). Notre Dame, Ind.

19. Frend, W.H.C. 1972: The Rise of the Monophysite Movement: Chapters in the History of the Church in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries. London.

20. Gratsianskiy, M.V. 2016a. [Pope Leo the Great and his interpretation of the sixth Nicene canon]. In: Tserkov’ v istorii Rossii [The Church in the His-tory of Russia]. Issue 11. Moscow, 159–175.

21. Gratsianskiy, M.V. 2016b: [“Acacian” or rather “Felician” schism? The problem of acceptability of a historiographic cliché]. Vizantiyskiy vremennik [Byzantine Chronicle] 100, 44–63.

22. Gratsianskiy, M.V. 2018: [The struggle of Pope Leo the Great for primacy in the context of the Eastern councils and the church policy of the emperors]. Vizantiyskiy vremennik [Byzantine Chronicle] 102, 46–70.

23. Gratsianskiy, M.V., Kuzenkov, P.V. 2018: [Pope Leo the Great and the Easter disputes of the middle of the 5th сentury in the context of inter-church and state-church relations]. Vizantiyskiy vremennik [Byzantine Chronicle] 102, 71–95.

24. Gratsianskiy, M.V. 2019a [Haeres Petri sive vicarius Petri. Arguments of Pope Leo the Great for the exceptional prerogatives of power for the bishop of Rome]. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya II: Istoriya. Istoriya Russkoy Pra-voslavnoy Tserkvi [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series 2: History. His-tory of the Russian Orthodox Church] 89, 27–48.

25. Gratsianskiy, M.V. 2019b [The historical and ideological context of the epistle of pope Gelasius I “Famuli vestrae pietatis”]. Vizantiyskiy vremennik [Byzantine Chronicle] 103, 85–112.

26. Greinacher, A. 1909: Die Anschauungen des Papstes Nikolaus I. über das Verhältnis von Staat und Kirche. Berlin–Leipzig.

27. Grill, J. 1904: Der Primat des Petrus. Eine Untersuchung. Tübingen.

28. Haller, J. 1951: Das Papsttum. Idee und Wirklichkeit. 2. Aufl. Bd. 2. Stuttgart.

29. Hoffmann, H. 1964: Die beiden Schwerter im hohen Mittelalter. Deutsches Ar-chiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 20, 78–114.

30. Hofmann, F. 1953: Der Kampf der Päpste um Konzil und Dogma von Chalkedon von Leo dem Großen bis Hormisdas (451–519). In: A. Grill-meier, H. Bacht (Hrsg.), Das Konzil von Chalkedon. Geschichte und Gegenwart. Bd. II. Entscheidung um Chalkedon. Würzburg, 13–94.

31. Hoskin, M. 2015: Prolegomena to a Critical Edition of the Letters of Pope Leo the Great. A Study of the Manuscripts. PhD Thesis. The University of Edinburgh.

32. Jalland, T. 1941: The Life and Times of St. Leo the Great. London.

33. Jasper, D., Fuhrmann, H. 2001: Papal Letters in the Early Middle Ages. Washington.

34. Jones, A.H.M. 1964: The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Vol. 1. Oxford.

35. Kaldellis, A. 2015: The Byzantine Republic. People and Power in New Rome. Cambridge (MA)– London.

36. Kissling, W. 1921: Das Verhältnis zwischen Sacerdotium und Imperium nach den Anschauungen der Päpste von Leo dem Großen bis Gelasius I. (440–496). Paderborn.

37. Knabe, L. 1936: Die gelasianische Zweigewaltenlehre bis zum Ende des Investiturstreits. Berlin.

38. Kofanov, L.L. (ed.) 2003: Digesty Yustiniana. Digesta Iustiniani [Justinian’s Digest]. Transl. from Latin. Vol. I. Moscow.

39. Kuzenkov, P.V. 2014: [The canonical status of Constantinople and its interpretation in Byzantium]. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series 1: Theology. Philosophy] 53, 25–51.

40. Langen, J. 1892: Geschichte der römischen Kirche von Nikolaus I. bis Gregor VII. Bonn.

41. Lecler, J. 1931: L’argument des deux glaives (Luc. XXII, 38) dans les controverses politiques du Moyen Âge: ses origines et son développement. Recherches de science religieuse 21/3, 299–339.

42. Levison, W. 1952: Die mittelalterliche Lehre von den beiden Schwertern. Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 9, 14–42.

43. Maccarrone, M. 1962: „Cathedra Petri“ und die Idee der Entwicklung des päpstlichen Primats vom 2. bis 4. Jahrhundert. Saeculum 13, 278–292.

44. Markus, R.A. 1991: The Latin Fathers. In: J.H. Burns (ed.), The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350 – c. 1450. Cambridge, 92–122.

45. Maksimovich, K.A. 2007: [Ecclesiastical novellae of St. Emperor Justinian I (527–565) in a modern Russian translation: working on a project]. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series 1: Theology. Philosophy] 17, 27–44.

46. Ottmann, H. 2004: Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Von den Anfängen bei den Griechen bis auf unsere Zeit. Bd. 2.2. Stuttgart.

47. Perels, E. 1912: Die Briefe Papst Nikolaus’ I. Die Handschriften. Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde 37, 535–586.

48. Perels, E. 1914: Die Briefe Papst Nikolaus’ I. Die kanonische Überlieferung. Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde 39, 43–153.

49. Perels, E. 1920: Papst Nikolaus I. und Anastasius Bibliothecarius: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Papsttums im neunten Jh. Berlin.

50. Powell, D. 2008: Haeres Petri: Leo I and church order. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 8–3, 203–210.

51. Rainer, J.M. 2006: Römisches Staatsrecht. Republik und Prinzipat. Darmstadt.

52. Riché, P. 1994: Nicolas Ier. In: Ph. Levillain (dir.), Dictionnaire historique de la papauté. Paris, 1161–1163.

53. Robinson, I.S. 1991: Church and papacy. In: J.H. Burns (ed.), Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350 – c. 1450. Cambridge, 252–305.

54. Schwartz, E. 1926: Das Nicaenum und das Constantinopolitanum auf der Synode von Chalkedon. Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 25, 38–88.

55. Stein, E. 1959: Histoire du Bas-Empire. Vol. 1. Paris.

56. Stockmeier, P. 1959. Leo I. des Grossen Beurteilung der kaiserlichen Religionspolitik. Μünchen.

57. Studer, B. 1980: Leo der Grosse und der Primat des römischen Bischofs. In: J. Brantschen, P. Selvatico (Hrsg.), Unterwegs zur Einheit. Festschrift für Heinrich Stirnimann. Freiburg, 617–630.

58. Thiel, A. 1859: De Nicolao papa I commentationes duae historico-canonicae. Vol. 1–2. Brunsbergae.

59. Thiel, A. (ed.) 1868: Epistulae Romanorum pontificum genuinae et quae ad eos scriptae sunt a S. Hilaro usque ad Pelagium II. Brunsbergae.

60. Ullmann, W. 1960: Leo I and the theme of papal primacy. Journal of Theological Studies 11, 25–51.

61. Ullmann, W. 1970: The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages: A Study in the Ideological Relation of Clerical to Lay Power. 3rd ed. Lon-don.

62. Ullmann, W. 1978: Der Grundsatz der Arbeitsteilung bei Gelasius I. Histori-sches Jahrbuch 97–98, 41–70.

63. Ullmann, W. 1981: Gelasius I. (492–496). Das Papsttum an der Wende der Spätantike zum Mittelalter. Stuttgart.

64. Valdenberg, V.E. 2008: Gosudarstvennoe ustroystvo Vizantii do kontsa VII v. [The Constitution of the Byzantine State until the End of the Seventh Century]. Saint Petersburg.

65. Voigt, K. 1965: Staat und Kirche von Konstantin dem Grossen bis zum Ende der Karolingerzeit. Stuttgart.

66. Wessel, S. 2008: Leo the Great and the Spiritual Rebuilding of a Universal Rome. Leiden–Boston.

67. Willems, P. 1890: Rimskoe gosudarstvennoe pravo [Le droit public romain]. Issue 2. Transl. from French. Kiev.

68. Wojtowytsch, M. 1981: Papsttum und Konzile von den Anfängen bis zu Leo I. (440–461). Studien zur Entstehung der Überordnung des Papstes über Konzile. Stuttgart.

69. Ziegler, A.K. 1942: Pope Gelasius I and his Teaching on the Relation of Church and State. Catholic Historical Review 27, 412–437.