1. Альбрехт М., фон. 2003: История римской литературы от Андроника до Боэция и ее влияния на позднейшие эпохи. Перевод с немецкого А.И. Любжина. Т. I.
2. Benferhat, Ya. 2006: Les grandes illusions: Catilina, Cicéron et César dans la Conjuration de Catilina. Vita Latina 175, 104–118.
3. Drummond, A. 1995: Law, Politics, and Power: Sallust and the Execution of the Catilinarian Conspirators. Stuttgart.
4. Duplá Ansuátegui, A. 2017: Incitement to violence in Late Republican political oratory. In: Cr. Rosillo-López (ed.), Political Communication in the Roman World. Leiden–Boston, 181–200.
5. Genovese, E.N. 1974: Cicero and Sallust: Catiline’s “Ruina”. Classical World 68, 171–174.
6. Gerrish, J. 2012: Sallust’s Histories and Triumviral Historiography. PhD Diss. University of Pennsylvania. URL: http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/511 
7. Habinek, T.N. 1998: The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.
8. Hodgson, L. 2017: Res Publica and the Roman Republic: ‘Without Body or Form’. Oxford.
9. Kananack, C.H.E. 2012: Reconsidering “The Conspiracy of Catiline”: Participants, Concepts, and Terminology in Cicero and Sallust. PhD Thesis. Exeter. URL: https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10036/4395/KananackC.pdf 
10. Lintott, A.W. 1999: The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.
11. Neumann, N. 2010: Der Ausnahmezustand in der Römischen Republik. Diss. Dr. iur. Wien. URL: http://othes.univie.ac.at/13636/1/2010-10-06_0748197.pdf 
12. Pagán, V.E. 2008: Toward a model of conspiracy theory for ancient Rome. New German Critique 103, 27–49.