Meddix tuticus as a Magistrate of Ancient Capua

Some issues related to the Samnite magistracy of meddix tuticus remain controversial in modern scholarship. Important evidence about this official can be found in sources related to Capua. Analysis of these literary and epigraphic sources leads to the conclusion that meddix tuticus was the single chief magistrate in Capua in the 5th–3rd centuries B.C., was elected from among the aristocracy for a one-year term and served as an eponym. His area of activity was limited to sacral affairs, and the immediate governance of the city (convening the senate and the popular assembly, city's security, reception of ambassadors, army recruitment). There’s no indication that meddix tuticus was an equivalent to the Roman dictator. He was one of the ordinary republican magistrates, subordinate to the decisions of the senate and the popular assembly, and acting as a mediator between several branches of the city government.

Keywords

Capua, magistrate, meddix tuticus, Samnites, Oscan language, iovile

Received

23.01.2019

Publication date

23.01.2019

Number of characters

37253

Cite

GOST	Karmazina O. Meddix tuticus as a Magistrate of Ancient Capua // Vestnik drevnei istorii – 2018. – V. 78. – Issue 4 C. 875-888 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vdi/s032103910002907-0-1-en (circulation date: 10.10.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S032103910002907-0
MLA	Karmazina, Olga "Meddix tuticus as a Magistrate of Ancient Capua." Vestnik drevnei istorii 78.4 (2018):875-888. DOI: 10.31857/S032103910002907-0
APA	Karmazina O. (2018). Meddix tuticus as a Magistrate of Ancient Capua. Vestnik drevnei istorii 78(4), pp.875-888 DOI: 10.31857/S032103910002907-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1805

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arslan, E.A. 2002: La dea “Giovia” di Capua (CE), IV–III sec. a. C. Schede del Museo – Archeologia 12, 1–2.

2. Buck, C.D. 1904: Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian. Boston.

3. Caiazza, D. 1986: Archeologia e storia antica del mandamento di Pietramelara e del Montemaggiore. I. Preistoria ed eta Sannitica. Pietramelara.

4. Campanile, E. 1996: Per la semantica di osco “meddiss”. In: L. Del Tutto Palma (a cura di), La tavola di Agnone nel contesto italico. Atti del Convegno di studio. Agnone 13–15 aprile 1994. Isernia, 169–176.

5. Curtius, G. 1873: Grundzuge der Griechischen Etymologie. Leipzig.

6. Del Tutto Palma, L. 1990: L’iscrizione di Muro Lucano. In: M. Tagliente (a cura di), Italici in Magna Grecia. Venosa, 106–109.

7. Devoto, G. 1931: Gli antichi italici. Firenze.

8. Di Iorio, A. 1998: Gli scavi di Bovianum Vetus oggi Pietrabbondante. Roma.

9. Enderis, E. 1871: Versuch einer Formenlehre der oskischen Sprache. Zurich.

10. Heurgon, J. 1942a: Recherches sur l’histoire, la religion et la civilisation preromaine de Capoue des origines a la deuxieme guerre punique. Paris.

11. Heurgon, J. 1942b: Etude sur les inscriptions osques de Capoue dites iuvilas. Paris.

12. Karmazina, O.V. Kul't Mater Matuty v drevnej Kapue. V sb.: Problemy izucheniya i prepodavaniya istorii kul'tury. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii. Voronezh, 2005. S. 38–41.

13. Karmazina, O.V. Problema osnovaniya Kapui. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya. Sotsiologiya 2, 2012. S. 28–35.

14. Karmazina, O.V. Magistraty Kapui v samnitskij period (V–III vv. do n.eh.). Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya Istoriya. Politologiya. 15 (236). Vyp. 39. 2016. S. 29–34.

15. La Regina, A. 1989: I Sanniti. In: G. Pugliese Carratelli (a cura di), Italia omnium terrarium parens. Milano, 301–432.

16. Lana, I. 1970: Letteratura latina. Firenze.

17. Mayak, I.L. Vzaimootnosheniya Rima i italijtsev v III–II vv. do n.eh. M., 1971.

18. Momigliano, A. 1969: Quarto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Roma.

19. Mommsen, T. 1850: Die Unteritalischen dialecte. Leipzig.

20. Mommsen, T. 1887: Romisches Staatrecht. Bd 3. Leipzig.

21. Monaco, D. 2002: Storia dei Sanniti e del Sannio. Isernia.

22. Nemirovskij, A.I., Kharsekin, A.I. Ehtruski. Voronezh, 1969.

23. Nechaj, F.M. Rim i italiki. Minsk, 1963.

24. Pareti, I. 1952: Storia di Roma e del mondo romano. Torino

25. Rosenberg, A. 1913: Der Stadt der alten Italiker. Berlin.

26. Salmon, E.T. 1995: Il Sannio e i Sanniti. Torino.

27. Sartori, F. 1953: Problemi di storia costituzionale italiota. Roma. Vol. 1.

28. Schulze, W. 1904: Zur Geschichte lateinischer Eigennamen. Berlin.

29. Skutsch, V.O. 1985: The annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford.

30. Smith, W. 1890: A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. London.

31. Splendore, E. 1983: Le antichita di Castel di Sangro. Castel di Sangro.

32. Tafaro, S. 2009: Considerazioni sulla Tabula Bantina. Diritto e Storia 8, 1–4.

33. Tagliamonte, G. 1996: I Sanniti. Milano.

34. Tsvetaev, I. Italijskie nadpisi. ZhMNP 1882. 3, 43–57; 1882. 7, 58–101; 1883. 11, 55–93; 1883. 12, 5–12; 1886. 1, 1–38.

35. Weinstock, S. 1931: Zur oskischen Magistratur. Klio XXIV, 243–244.