The Impact of Sanctions on Highly Productive Russian Scientists

The article reviews the effects of sanctions, introduced in 2022, on highly productive Russian scientists. Such scientists play a pivotal role in Russian academia. We formulate hypotheses by analyzing broader context of sanctions, the government response, as well as consider existing assessments of their impact. To provide empirical evidence, we rely on data from a sociological survey conducted in June-September, 2022, as a part of the ‘Monitoring of education markets and organizations’ project. The group of highly productive scientists included 1,967 individuals falling within the top five percentiles of the RSCI (Russian Science Citation Index). We utilized their responses for further analysis. The survey results indicate that three-quarters of high-performing scholars experienced various types of limitations because of the sanctions. The most significant challenges were associated with economic sanctions, resulting in restricted access to material and technical resources, infrastructure, and information/data repositories. Conversely, the impact of sanctions on international relations and cooperation was relatively less pronounced. In this domain, the effects of sanctions were primarily observed through decisions made by organizations and individuals to terminate or curtail collaborations with Russian scientists, rather than at the state level. Significantly, the group most affected by sanction restrictions comprises internationally mobile young scientists under 35, specializing in natural, technical, and medical sciences, and employed in leading universities and scientific institutions. Consequently, they face the highest degree of vulnerability to emigration, thereby posing an imminent risk of potential brain drain within the Russian scientific community in the nearest future.

Keywords

sanctions, highly productive scientists, Russian science, science and technology policy, effects of sanctions, Russian science, anti-sanctions measures

Received

20.01.2024

Publication date

20.01.2024

Number of characters

26051

Cite

GOST	Dezhina I., Nefedova A. The Impact of Sanctions on Highly Productive Russian Scientists // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2023. – Issue 12 C. 19-31 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250029334-0-1-en (circulation date: 18.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250029334-0
MLA	Dezhina, Irina G, Nefedova, Alena I "The Impact of Sanctions on Highly Productive Russian Scientists." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 12 (2023):19-31. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250029334-0
APA	Dezhina I., Nefedova A. (2023). The Impact of Sanctions on Highly Productive Russian Scientists. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (12), pp.19-31 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250029334-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 146

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Borusyak L. (2022) A new wave of highly educated emigration: why they leave Russia. Palladium. Vol. 3. No. 2: 98–115. DOI: 10.55167/29b32cb46280. (In Russ.)

2. Brainard J. (2022) Few journals heed calls to boycott Russian papers. Science. March 10. DOI: 10.1126/science.adb1981.

3. Dezhina I.G. (2022) Science under Sanctions: the Experience of Iranian Universities. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. Vol. 26. No. 3: 22–34. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2022.03.019/. (In Russ.)

4. Dezhina I.G. (2023) Russia’s Science Policy in 2018–2022: Controversial Signals. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Sociological Journal]. Vol. 29. No. 2: 132–149. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.10. (In Russ.)

5. Felbermayr G., Morgan T., Syropoulos C., Yotov Y. (2021) Understanding economic sanctions: Interdisciplinary perspectives on theory and evidence. European Economic Review. No. 135: 103720. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103720.

6. Gaind N., Abbott A., Witze A. et al. (2022) Seven ways the war in Ukraine is changing global science. Nature. No. 607: 440–443. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-01960-0

7. Gimpelson V.E. (2022) Russian human capital in times of sanctions and countersanctions: Some redistributive implications. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi associacii [Journal of the New Economic Association]. No. 3(55): 234–238. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-16. (In Russ.)

8. Golubchik A.M., Pak E.V. (2022) Parallel imports to Russia: certain aspects of logistics. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik [Russian Foreign Economic Journal]. Nо. 10: 27–37. (In Russ.)

9. Gordin M. (2022) A century of science boycotts. Nature. No. 606: 27–29. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-01475-8.

10. Gusev A.B., Yurevich M.A. (2022) Science Policy of Russia – 2022: the profession is not dearer than the Motherland. Moscow: Pero. (In Russ.)

11. Johnson J., Adams J., Grant J., Murphy D. (2022) Stumbling bear, soaring dragon. Russia, China and the geopolitics of global science. Harvard Kennedy School for Business and Government, Clarivate, The Policy Institute, King’s College London.

12. Jones L. (2015) Societies Under Siege. Exploring How International Economic Sanctions (Do Not) Work. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

13. Kokabisaghi F., MillerA.C., Bashar F.R. et al. (2019) Impact of United States political sanctions on international collaborations and research in Iran. BMJ Global Health. Vol. 4. No. 5: e001692.

14. Kotsemir M.N., Dyachenko E., Nefedova A. (2022) Mobile young researchers and their non-mobile ‘twins’: who is winning the academic race? Scientometrics. Vol. 127. No. 12: 7307–7332. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04488-2.

15. Morgan T.C., Bapat N., Kobayashi Y. (2014) Threat and imposition of economic sanctions 1945–2005: Updating the TIES dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science. No. 31(5): 541–558. DOI: 10.1177/0738894213520379.

16. Mulder N. (2022) How America Learned to Love (Ineffective) Sanctions. Foreign Policy. January 30. URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/01/30/us-sanctions-reliance-results/ (accessed ???).

17. Neuenkirch M., Neumeier F. (2015) The impact of UN and US economic sanctions on GDP growth. European Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 40. Nо. 2: 110–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.09.00.

18. Özdamar Ö., Shahin E. (2021) Consequences of economic sanctions: The state of the art and paths forward. International Studies Review. Vol. 23. No. 4: 1646–1671.

19. Pala T. (2021) The Effectiveness of Economic Sanctions: A Literature Review. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy. Vol. 14. No. 1: 239–259.

20. Simola H. (2022) Trade sanctions and Russian production. BOFIT Policy Briefs. Nо. 4. URL: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:bof-202205101191 (accessed ???).

21. Sitkevich D.A., Starodubrovskaya I.V. (2022) Short-Term and Long-Term Consequences of Sanctions: Experience of Iran and Yugoslavia. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Questions of Theoretical Economics]. No. 3: 77–98. (In Russ.)

22. Teslia P.N. (2023) How Economic Sanctions (Don’t) Work (about Lee Jones’ book “Societies under Siege”). ECO. No. 4: 183–192. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2023-4-183-192. (In Russ.)

23. UNESCO Science Report. The race against time for smarter development. Paris: UNESCO. 2021