Erving Goffman’s Trite Metaphors

The article reconsiders Goffman’s legacy in the light of present-day realities. The author deems the revitalization of cognitive metaphors to be premise and necessary condition for viability of the dramaturgical perspective. Metaphors awaken when they begin to wake us up, come to life when they give us life. In view of this, an attempt has been made to reveal all-too-human and atemporal facets of the tropes we are all very familiar with – in other words, their primary existential foundations. However, as G. Lakoff and M. Johnson put it, relationships between metaphors are based on entailment, or on sub-categorization. Sharing P. Riсоеur’s point of view that “metaphorical sense as such feeds on the density of the imagery released by the poem” – and actually, by any metaphorical text – the author makes clear meanings elusive and “deciphers” Goffman’s writings using his (Goffman’s) own “prompt messages” or low-key details to resolve some kind of semantic ellipsis. As a result, key metaphorical lines of reasoning under discussion include (1) perspective–frame–door; (2) world–theatre/as if–sleep; (3) man–actor–shadow. Our attention is drawn to the astounding similarity between frame analysis and brushwork of Belgian surrealist Rene Magritte who challenged preconditioned perceptions of familiar things giving them new contextual meanings. In the concluding section a cautionary note about the possible transformation of Goffmanisque metaphors to prophecy is sounded.

Keywords

E. Goffman, dramaturgical perspective, living metaphor, prophetic metaphor, frame-door, theatre-sleep, actor-shadow.

Received

27.06.2022

Publication date

28.06.2022

Number of characters

39363

Cite

GOST	Kravchenko E. Erving Goffman’s Trite Metaphors // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2022. – Issue 6 C. 3-15 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250020896-8-1-en (circulation date: 08.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250020831-7
MLA	Kravchenko, Elena "Erving Goffman’s Trite Metaphors." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 6 (2022):3-15. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250020831-7
APA	Kravchenko E. (2022). Erving Goffman’s Trite Metaphors. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (6), pp.3-15 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250020831-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 554

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Black M. (1962) Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

2. Blumenberg H. (2010) Paradigms for a Metaphorology. Trans. R. Savage. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

3. Borges H.L. (1997) Metaphorю In: Borges H.L. Collected works in 3 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Polaris, 1997: 192–195. (In Russ.)

4. Filonenko А. (2010) «Production of Presence» and New Cultural Sensitivity: Gumbrecht’s “Immodest Proposal” and its Academic Extensions. Koynoniya. Vestnik KHNU im. V.N. Karazina [ΚΟΙΝΩΟΝIΑ. Bulletin of KhNU V.N. Karazin]. No. 904: 49–74 (In Russ.)

5. Filonenko А. (2016) Beauty and the Return of Reality: New Possibilities of Theoaesthetics. URL: https://artos.org/projects/almanac/krasota-i-vozvrashhenie-realnosti-filonenko/ (accessed 01.03.2022). (In Russ.)

6. Goffman E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

7. Goffman E. (1961) Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

8. Goffman E. (1982) Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.

9. Goffman E. (1983) The Interaction Order. American Sociological Review. Vol. 48. No. 1: 1–17.

10. Goffman E. (1986) Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

11. Goffman E. (1988) Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

12. Horney K. (2016). The Neurotic Personality of Our Time. Nyköping (Sweden): Philosophical arkiv. (In Russ.)

13. Jung C.G. (1973) To Fanny Bowditch. 22 October, 1916. In: Jung C.G. Letters. Vol. 1: 1906–1950. Princeton University Press.

14. Kuhn Th. (1977) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Мoscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

15. Kuhn Th. (2014) The Road since Structure. Moscow: АSТ. (In Russ.)

16. Lakoff G., Johnson M. (2004) Metaphors We Live By. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.)

17. Lindenberg S. (1985) An Assessment of the New Political Economy: Its Potential for Social Sciences and for Sociology in Particular. Sociological Theory. Spring: 99–113.

18. Ortega y Gasset J. (1990) Las dos grandes metaforas. In: Тheory of Metaphor. Transl. from Spanish by N.D. Arutyunova; introduc. art., comp. by N.D. Arutyunova; transl. ed. N.D. Arutyunova, M.A. Zhurinskaya. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

19. Riсоеur P. (1990) La metaphore vive. In: Тheory of Metaphor. Transl. from Fr. by A.A. Zaliznyak; introduc. art., comp. by N.D. Arutyunova; transl. ed. N.D. Arutyunova, M.A. Zhurinskaya. Moscow: Progress: 435–455. (In Russ.)

20. Schutz A. (2004) Scheler’s Theory of Intersubjectivity and the General Thesis of the Alter Ego. In: Schutz A. Selected works. World glowing with meaning. Moscow: ROSSPEN: 202–232. (In Russ.)