Digital Transformation of Russian NGOs During the Pandemic

 
PIIS013216250020647-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250020647-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Director of the Center for Studies of the Nonprofit Sector and Civil Society, Head of the Chair Economics and Management of NPOs
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Senior Research Fellow of the Center for Studies of the Nonprofit Sector and Civil Society
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 9
Pages38-48
Abstract

The paper presents the results of the calculations of Russia’s first Index of NGO Basic Digital Competencies based on international experience and the data of two All-Russia NGO Surveys before the pandemic (2019) and a year following the pandemic outbteak (2021). The data highlight a critical underuse of digital technologies by Russian NGOS. An average index value is about 2 on a 10-point scale. Comparison of typological groups in 2019 and 2020 shows some positive shifts: a total share of “digital leaders” and “advanced” NGOs increased although the number of “digital outsiders” almost did not change. 

Surprisingly, the variable “digital fundraising” showed the lowest score, which may be explained from the resource dependence perspective. A conclusion is made that digitalization mostly affected NGOs that have already implemented digital technologies and during the pandemic turned to applying new digital tools, whereas the NGOs that did not apply digital technologies earlier were not motivated to introduce them. This indicates a kind of polarization in the NGO sector between the typological groups of “digital leaders” and “digital outsiders” which was manifested during the pandemic. The index potential as a tool of both evaluation and diagnostics of reserves has been shown. The latter links the progress in NGO digital competences with the implementation of the strategic approach and the use of marketing technologies. 

KeywordsNGOs, digital technologies, digital competencies, indices, pandemic
AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the Program for Basic Research of the National Research University Higher School of Economics.
Received28.09.2022
Publication date29.09.2022
Number of characters28702
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 669

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aleskerov F., Kataeva E., Pislyakov V., Yakuba V. (2013) Assesment of academic workers’ contribution by the threshold aggregation method. Upravleniye bolʹshimi sistemami: sbornik trudov [Large-Scale Systems Control]. No. 44: 172–189. (In Russ.)

2. Aleskerov F.T., Yuzbashev D.A., Yаkuba V.I. (2007) Threshold aggregation of three-graded rankings. Avtomatika i telemekhanika [Automation and Remote Control]. No. 1: 147–152. (In Russ.)

3. Deviatko I.F. (1993) Diagnostic procedure in sociology. Essay on history and theory. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

4. Mersianova I.V. Russian civil society in a regional dimension. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsialʹnyye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal]. Vol. 4. No. 92: 26–44. (In Russ.)

5. Potapova E.G., Poteev P.M., Shklyaruk M.S., eds. (2021) The Strategy of Digital Transformation: to Write in Order To Implement. Moscow: RANKHiGS. (In Russ.)

6. Tolstova Yu.N. One-dimensional scaling: test tradition in sociology (construction of indices, Likert scale, latent structural analysis). Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoye modelirovaniye (4M) [Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (4M)]. No. 8: 54–65. (In Russ.)

7. Bhati, A., McDonnell D. (2019) Success in an Online Giving Day: The Role of Social Media in Fundraising. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Vol. 49. No. 1: 74–92. DOI: 10.1177/0899764019868849.

8. Chui, C.H.K., Chan, C.H. (2019). The role of technology in reconfiguring volunteer management in nonprofits in Hong Kong: Benefits and discontents. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. Vol. 3. No. 1: 89–111. DOI: 10.1002/nml.21369.

9. Curtis L. et al. (2010) Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review. Vol. 36. No. 1: 90–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.003.

10. Eimhjellen I.S. (2014) Internet Communication: Does It Strengthen Local Voluntary Organizations? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Vol. 43. No. 5: 890–909. DOI: 10.1177/0899764013487996.

11. Gil-Garcia J., Dawes S., Pardo T. (2018) Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads. Public Management Review. Vol. 20. No. 5: 633–646. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181.

12. Hackler D., Saxton G.D. (2007) The Strategic Use of Information Technology by Nonprofit Organizations: Increasing Capacity and Untapped Potential. Public Administration Review. Vol. 67. No. 3: 474–487.

13. Lee R.L., Bhattacherjee A. (2011) A Theoretical Framework for Strategic Use of the Web Among Nonprofit Organizations. Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference. Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

14. Lovejoy K., Saxton G.D. (2012) Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of computer-mediated communication. Vol. 17. No. 3: 337–353. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x.

15. McNutt J. et al. (2018) Technology in Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action. Leiden: BRILL.

16. Saxton G.D., Guo C. (2009) Accountability Online: Understanding the Web-Based Accountability Practices of Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Vol. 40. No. 2: 270–295. DOI: 10.1177/0899764009341086.

17. Shafiee N., Shafiee S., Shafiee M, Hvam L. (2019) Challenges of Digital Transformation: The Case of the Non-Profit Sector. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 1245–1249. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607762.

18. van Veldhoven Z., Vanthienen J. (2019) Designing a Comprehensive understanding of Digital transformation and Its Impact. In: Proceedings of 32nd Bled Conference: Humanizing Technology for a Sustainable Society. Bled: Slovenia: 746–763.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up