From Virtual to Digital Research: Methodological Promises and Limitations of Approaches

Occupation: Lecturer, Department of Sociological Research Methods
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Edition

Issue 1

Pages

62-70

Abstract

The article analyzes the methodological promises and limitations of virtual ethnographic approaches. It is shown how the redefinition of ethnography’s basic concepts for online contexts is reflected in their methodological tools. Based on approaches of virtual ethnography and ethnography of virtual worlds, which become a starting point for researchers in the study of the virtual, the paper discusses principles and procedures for implementing ethnography in the online space. We highlight the differences in how each of the approaches interprets and analyzes the offline context, as well as how specific features of the online environment are considered. As a part of criticism, the article discusses relationship between the concepts of virtual and digital demonstrating why the concept of digital is more relevant for describing recent online contexts.

Keywords

virtual ethnography, ethnography of virtual worlds, virtual reality, digital ethnography, online communities

Received

15.05.2022

Publication date

15.03.2023

Number of characters

20984

Cite

GOST	Barkhatova L. From Virtual to Digital Research: Methodological Promises and Limitations of Approaches // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2023. – Issue 1 C. 62-70 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250020183-4-1-en (circulation date: 03.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250020183-4
MLA	Barkhatova, Larisa A. "From Virtual to Digital Research: Methodological Promises and Limitations of Approaches." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 1 (2023):62-70. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250020183-4
APA	Barkhatova L. (2023). From Virtual to Digital Research: Methodological Promises and Limitations of Approaches. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (1), pp.62-70 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250020183-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 507

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Belorussova S. (2021) Сyberethnography: Methodology and Technology. Ethnografia [Ethnography]. Vol. 3. No. 13: 123–145. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31250/2618-8600-2021-3(13)-123-145.

2. Kolozaridi P., Shchetvina A., Sokolova E. (2018) Method: Digital Ethnography. URL: http://mmbook-hse.ru/books/47/sections/558/ (accessed 20.01.2022). (In Russ.)

3. Myasnikova M.L. (2017) Online Ethnographic Approach to the Study of Internet Communities: Methodological Differences and Basic Principles. Book review: Hine C. Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Every day. Bloomsbury Academic, 2015 – 240 p. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. Vol. 20. No. 1: 199–207. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2017.20.1.13.

4. Abidin C., de Seta G. (2020) Private Messages From the Field: Confessions on Digital Ethnography and its Discomforts. Journal of Digital Social Research. Vol. 2. No. 1: 1–19. DOI: 10.33621/jdsr.v2i1.35.

5. Airoldi M. (2018) Ethnography and the Digital Fields of Social Media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Vol. 21. No. 6: 661–673. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1465622.

6. Akemu O., Abdelnour S. (2020) Confronting the Digital: Doing Ethnography in Modern Organizational Settings. Organizational Research Methods. Vol. 23. No. 2: 296–321. DOI: 10.1177/1094428118791018.

7. Andrejevic M. (2013) Infoglut: How Too Much Information is Changing the Way We Think and Know. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203075319.

8. Azarova M., Hazoglou M., Aronoff-Spencer E. (2022) Just Slack It: A Study of Multidisciplinary Teamwork Based on Ethnography and Data from Online Collaborative Software. New Media & Society. Vol. 24. No. 6: 1435–1458. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820975723.

9. Baym N. (2000) Tune in Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781452204710.

10. Bell D. (2001) An Introduction to Cybercultures. London: Routledge.

11. Bengtsson S. (2014) Faraway, so Сlose! Proximity and Distance in Ethnography Online. Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 36. No. 6: 862–877. DOI: 10.1177/0163443714531195.

12. Beneito-Montagut R. (2011) Ethnography Goes Online: Towards a User-Centred Methodology to Research Interpersonal Communication on the Internet. Qualitative Research. Vol. 11. No. 6: 716–735. DOI: 10.1177/1468794111413368.

13. Berthod O., Grothe-Hammer M., Sydow J. (2017) Network Ethnography: A Mixed-method Approach for the Study of Practices in Interorganizational Settings. Organizational Research Methods. Vol. 20. No. 2: 299–323. DOI: 10.1177/1094428116633872.

14. Boellstorff T. (2008) Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. New York: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvc77h1s.

15. Boellstorff T., Nardi B., Pearce C., Taylor T.L. (2012) Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.cttq9s20.

16. Boellstorff T. (2020) Rethinking Digital Anthropology. In: Horst H.A., Miller D. (eds) Digital Anthropology. London: Routledge: 39–61. DOI: 10.4324/9781003085201.

17. Bunce M., Wright K., Scott M. (2018) ‘Our Newsroom in the Cloud’: Slack, Virtual Newsrooms and Journalistic Practice. New Media & Society. Vol. 20. No. 9: 3381–3399. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817748955.

18. Caliandro A. (2014) Ethnography in Digital Spaces: Ethnography of Virtual Worlds, Netnography, and Digital Ethnography. In: Denny R., Sunderland P. (eds) Handbook of Anthropology in Business. New York: Routledge: 658–680. DOI: 10.4324/9781315427850.

19. Caliandro A. (2018) Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Vol. 47. No. 5: 551–578. DOI: 10.1177/0891241617702960.

20. Cottica A., Hassoun A., Manca M., Vallet J., Melançon G. (2020) Semantic Social Networks: A Mixed Methods Approach to Digital Ethnography. Field Methods. Vol. 32. No. 3: 274–290. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X20908236.

21. Dai R., Hu L. (2022) Inclusive Communications in COVID-19: A Virtual Ethnographic Study of Disability Support Network in China. Disability & Society. Vol. 37. No. 1: 3–21. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2021.1933388.

22. Domínguez D., Beaulieu A., Estalella A., Gómez E., Schnettler B., Read R. (2007) Virtual Ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Vol. 8. No. 3. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-8.3.274.

23. Gabriels K., De Backer C.L.S. (2016) Virtual Gossip: How Gossip Regulates Moral Life in Virtual Worlds. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 63: 683–693. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.065.

24. Garcia A.C., Standlee A.I., Bechkoff J., Cui Y. (2009) Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer Mediated Communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Vol. 38. No. 1: 52–84. DOI: 10.1177/0891241607310839.

25. Gobo G. (2008) Doing Ethnography. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9780857028976.

26. Feldon D.F., Kafai Y.B. (2008) Mixed Methods for Mixed Reality: Understanding Users’ Avatar Activities in Virtual Worlds. Education Tech Research Dev. No. 56: 575–593. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-007-9081-2.

27. Hallett R.E., Barber K. (2014) Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Vol. 43. No. 3: 306–330. DOI: 10.1177/0891241613497749.

28. Hampton K.N. (2017) Studying the Digital: Directions and Challenges for Digital Methods. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 43: 167–188. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053505.

29. Hine C. (2000) Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9780857020277.

30. Hine C. (2011) Towards Ethnography of Television on the Internet: A Mobile Strategy for Exploring Mundane Interpretive Activities. Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 33. No. 4: 567–582. DOI: 10.1177/0163443711401940.

31. Hine C. (2015a) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: 10.4324/9781003085348.

32. Hine C. (2015b) Mixed Methods and Multimodal Research and Internet Technologies. In: Hesse-Biber S.N., Johnson R.B. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press: 503–521. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.001.0001.

33. Hjorth L., Horst H., Galloway A., Bell G. (2016) The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315673974.

34. Kozinets R.V. (2010) Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.

35. Laaksonen S.M, Nelimarkka M., Tuokko M., Marttila M., Kekkonen A., Villi M. (2017) Working the Fields of Big Data: Using Big-Data-Augmented Online Ethnography to Study Candidate–Candidate Interaction at Election Time. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. Vol. 14. No. 2: 110–131. DOI: 0.1080/19331681.2016.1266981.

36. Marcus G.E. (1995) Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology. Vol. 24: 95–117. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.

37. Markham A.N. (1998) Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

38. Murthy D. (2008) Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research. Sociology. Vol. 42. No. 5: 837–855. DOI: 10.1177/0038038508094565.

39. Murthy D. (2011) Emergent Digital Ethnographic Methods for Social Research. In: Hesse-Biber S.N. (ed) The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press: 158–180.

40. Nardi B.A. (2010) My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/toi.8008655.0001.001.

41. Pearce C. (2009) Communities of Play: Emergent Cultures in Online Games and Virtual World. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8039.001.0001.

42. Postill J. (2008) Localizing the Internet beyond Communities and Networks. New Media & Society. Vol. 10. No. 3: 413–431. DOI: 10.1177/1461444808089416.

43. Rogers R. (2009) The End of the Virtual: Digital Methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: 10.5117/9789056295936.

44. Rogers R. (2013) Digital Methods. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8718.001.0001.

45. Taylor T.L. (2006) Play between Worlds: Exploring Online Game Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/5418.001.0001.

46. Turkle S. (1997) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

47. Zani B. (2021) Shall WeChat? Switching between Online and Offline Ethnography. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. Vol. 152. No. 1: 52–75. DOI: 10.1177/07591063211040229.