Crisis in Modern teaching: What went wrong?

Crisis in modern teaching is examined as a result of an inflow of the new generations of university students in the 2010s. This crisis is reflected in demolition of traditional text culture, progressing rejection of the cultural capital passive accumulation, emergence of the alternative educational programs, new requirements to the teaching materials, increasing difficulties in keeping attention of the students, erosion of their sustainable motivation, noticeable decline of the teachers’ authority, persistent attempts to question the assessment systems, spread of new ethic, and strengthening of students’ intentions to defend their rights.

Keywords

crisis • higher education • surveys of students and teachers • new ethic • Russia

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Program for Basic Research of the National Research University Higher School of Economics.

Received

27.06.2022

Publication date

28.06.2022

Number of characters

31237

Cite

GOST	Radaev V. Crisis in Modern teaching: What went wrong? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2022. – Issue 6 C. 114-124 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250019853-1-1-en (circulation date: 02.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250019853-1
MLA	Radaev, Vadim "Crisis in Modern teaching: What went wrong?." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 6 (2022):114-124. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250019853-1
APA	Radaev V. (2022). Crisis in Modern teaching: What went wrong?. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (6), pp.114-124 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250019853-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 952

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Chotpitayasunondh V., Douglas K.M. (2018) The Effects of “Phubbing” on Social Interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 48. No. 6: 304–316.

2. Gretsky M., Lerner J. (2021) Students of Academic Capitalism: Emotional Dimensions in the Commercialization of Higher Education. Sociological Research Online. Vol. 26. No. 1: 205–221.

3. Gubaylovsky V. (2019) Artificial Intelligence and Human Brain. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

4. Higher Education: A Way to Success or Excessive Waste of Time and Money (2018). Moscow: VCIOM. URL: https://infographics.wciom.ru/theme-archive/society/social-problems/education-skills/article/vysshee-obrazovanie-put-k-uspekhu-ili-lishnjaja-trata-vre (accessed 27.04.2022). (In Russ.)

5. Kaneman D. (2014) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Moscow: AST (In Russ.).

6. Karavayev N.L., Soboleva E.V. (2017) An Analysis of Software Services and Platforms Having Potential for the Gamification of Teaching. Nauchno-Metodicheskiy Elektronnyi Zhournal Kontzept [Science and Methodic E-Journal Concept]. No. 8: 14–25. (In Russ.)

7. Koreshnikova Yu.N., Froumin I.D. (2020) Professional Competencies of the Teacher as a Factor Enabling a Critical Thinking of the Students. Psykhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovaniye [Psychological Science and Education]. No. 6: 88–103. (In Russ.)

8. Kouzminov Ya.I., Yudkevich M.M. (2021) Universities in Russia: How It Works. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House. (In Russ.)

9. Lerner J., Zbenovich C., Kaneh-Shalit T. (2021) Changing meanings of university teaching: the emotionalisation of academic culture in Russia, Israel and the US. Emotions and Society. Vol. 3. No. 1: 73–93.

10. Lukianoff G., Haidt J. (2015) The Coddling of the American Mind. The Atlantic. September. URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/ (accessed 27.04.2022).

11. Maksimenko A.A., Deyneka O.S., Dukhanina L.N., Saporovskaya M.V. (2021) Fubbing: Peculiarities of Addictive Behaivior of the Youth. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 4: 345–362. (In Russ.).

12. Maloshonok N.G. (2016) Interdependence of the Internet Use and Multimedia Technologies in the Educational Process with a Student Involvement. Voprosy Obrazovaniya [Education Studies]. No. 4: 59–83. (In Russ.)

13. Pariser E. (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. L.: Viking.

14. Polivanova K.N., Bochaver A.A., Pavlenko K.V., Sivak E.V. (2020) Education Beyond the School Walls. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House. (In Russ.).

15. Radaev V.V. (2022) Teaching in Crisis. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House. (In Russ.) (in print).

16. Radaev V.V. (2020) Millennials: How Russian Society Is Being Changed. 2d ed. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House (In Russ.).

17. Radaev V.V. (2018) Millennials compared to previous generations: an empirical analysis. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3. P. 15–33. (In Russ.).

18. Readings B. (2010) The University in Ruins. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House. (In Russ.).

19. Rosovsky H. (2015) The University: An Owner’s Manual. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House. (In Russ.).

20. Slaughter S., Rhoades G. (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore. L.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

21. The End of the World as We Know It. A Guide of the Knife Journal on the New Ethic, New Relationships and New Justice. Moscow: Alpina Non-Fiction, 2021. (In Russ.)

22. Tomlinson M. (2017) Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol. 38. No. 4: 450–467.

23. Twenge J.M. (2019) iGen: Why Today's Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. Moscow: Ripol-Classic. (In Russ.).