Was Soviet Society Socialist?

Publication type Article
Status Published
Occupation: Head of Chair of Social Philosophy and Philosophy of History
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 12

The article is devoted to the typological characteristics of the Soviet society, which the author considers as a variant of the «Asian mode of production» that emerged in a European country on an industrial rather than agricultural basis. The author takes the view that the governmentalization of the means of production cannot be considered a step towards socialist construction, if it does not lead to the subsequent socialization of these means. A sign of social ownership is the absence of capable people in society who are forced to sell (give up) their labor power to the owners of the means of production, regardless of whether they are represented by individuals, groups of people, or even social institutions in which people perform pre-determined social roles. In the USSR, the author argues, non-parcellular private property emerged over the conditions, objects, and implements of labor, collectively owned by the party and state elite, who used the labor of people deprived of property and the ability to influence economic and social policy. The fact that the bureaucratic elite does not always seek personal enrichment, and some of the workers did not feel themselves the object of exploitation, does not change the typological characteristics of society. The author examines the objective reasons for the collapse of the USSR, which he considers the collapse of the political and not socialist system, which has a historical perspective and can be implemented on a higher level of technology and technology development than now.

Keywordscapitalism, socialism, communism, Asian mode of production, politarism
AcknowledgmentThis article was prepared within the framework of the activities of the MSU Scientific-Educational School «Preservation of World Cultural-Historical Heritage», with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the CAON, project No. 21-511-93006.
Publication date24.12.2021
Number of characters28981
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 548

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Engels F. (1961) The Development of Socialism from Utopia to Science. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. Vol. 19. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 185–230. (In Russ.)

2. Gellner E. (1992) Marxist Book of Genesis. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review]. No. 2: 35–51. (In Russ.)

3. Marx K. (1957) The British dominion in India. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. Vol. 9. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 130–136. (In Russ.)

4. Semyonov Y.I. (1992) On Primitive Communism, Marxism and the Essence of Man. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review]. No. 3: 31–46. (In Russ.)

5. Semyonov Y.I. (2008) Polytarian («Asian») mode of production: essence and place in the history of mankind and Russia. Moscow: Magic Key. (In Russ.)

6. Vasiliev L.S. (2011) Evolution of Society. Types of society and their transformation. Moscow: KDU. (In Russ.)

7. Wittfogel K.A. [1957] Oriental Despotism. A comparative study of total power. URL: http://samlib.ru/s/strahow_a_a/wittfogel-oriental-despotism.shtml (accessed 21.10.2021). (In Russ).

Система Orphus