Wrestler Masculinity in Dagestan as a Local Hegemony

Publication type Article
Status Published
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 11

The article presents an analysis of the reproduction of hegemonic masculinity in the local context on the example of masculinity of freestyle wrestlers in the Republic of Dagestan. Based on the materials of semi-structured in-depth biographical interviews with current and former wrestlers, as well as with young Dagestan men who are not involved in wrestling practices, it is concluded that the male subjectivity cultivated in this sport is reproduced as hegemonic in the context of the entire Dagestan society. This occurs due to the following institutional and cultural instruments: the massification of freestyle wrestling, its importance as a talent factory for politics, the alliance of wrestling communities with religious elites, the function of freestyle wrestling as an institution to maintain power and control of the elders over the juniors in the conditions of decay of traditional society.

Keywordshegemonic masculinity, Dagestan, freestyle wrestling, mass sports, power of elders
AcknowledgmentThis article is a translation of: Поляков С.И. Борцовская маскулинность в Дагестане как локальная гегемония // Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2021. No 10: 116–124. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250015531-7. The original research was completed under the sponsorship of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research as part of the scientific project No. 1931190056.
Publication date22.12.2021
Number of characters25066
Cite     Download pdf

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 678

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bobrovnikov V. O. (2001) Hierarchy and Power in the Mountain Dagestan Community. In: Races and Peoples. Iss. 26. Moscow: Nauka: 96–107. (In Russ.)

2. Brusov G. P. (2012b) Comparative Analysis of Freestyle Wrestling Condition in the NorthCaucuses Federal Region. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P. F. Lesgafta. No. 4: 12–15. (In Russ.)

3. Brusov G. P. (2012a) Model of Sports Federation Activity on Development of Sport in Modern Social and Economic Conditions (the Case of Russian Wrestling Federation). Cand. Sci. (Pedagog.) Dissertation. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)

4. Connell R. W. (1998) Masculinities and Globalization. Men and Masculinities. Vol. 1. No. 1: 3–23. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X98001001001.

5. Connell R. W. (2005) Masculinities. 2nd ed. Berkley; Los Angeles: California Univ. Press.

6. Connell R. W., Messerschmidt, J.W. (2005) Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society. Vol. 19. No. 6: 829–859. DOI: 10.1177/0891243205278639.

7. Gramsci A. (1991) Prison Notebooks: In 4 parts. Part 1. Moscow: Polit. litra. (In Russ.)

8. Kolesnik N. (2018) “Oh Sport, You are the World”: On the Interaction of Power and Sport in the Russian Regions. Vlast’ i elity [Power and Elites]. No. 5: 387–417. DOI: 10.31119/pe.2018.5.14. (In Russ.)

9. Lytkina T. (2010) Transforming the Gender Regime: An Ethnosociological Analysis of Modernization in the North Caucasus. Laboratorium: zhurnal sotsialnykh issledovaniy [Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research]. Vol. 2. No. 3: 96–125. (In Russ.)

10. Lytkina Т. S. (2013) Transformation of Traditional Masculinity in the Modern North Caucasus. In: Tartakovskaya I. N. (ed.) Ways to Be a Man: Transformations of Masculinity in the 21st Century. Moscow: Zven’ya: 235–249. (In Russ.)

11. McKay J., Messner M. A., Sabo D. (eds) (2000) Masculinities, Gender Relations, and Sport. Thousand Oaks; London; New Delhi: Sage Publications.

12. Messner M. A. (1989) Masculinities and Athletic Careers. Gender & Society. Vol. 3. No. 1: 71–88. DOI: 10.1177/089124389003001005.

13. Messner M. A. (1990) When Bodies are Weapons: Masculinity and Violence in Sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Vol. 25. No. 3: 203–220. DOI: 10.1177/101269029002500303.

14. Solonenko M. (2012) Wrestlers for Power: Sports Communities and their Role in the Political Life of Dagestan. In: Karpov Y. (ed.) Society as the Subject and the Agent of Power: Essays on the Political Anthropology of the Caucasus. St. Petersburg: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie: 91–110. (In Russ.)

15. Starodubrovskaya I. V., Kazenin K. I. (2014) North Caucasian City: Territory of Conflicts. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 6: 70–82. (In Russ.)

16. Starodubrovskaya I. V., Zubarevich N. V., Sokolov D. V., Intigrinova T. P., Mironova N. I., Magomedov G. Kh. (2011) The Northern Caucasus: A Modernization Challenge. Moscow: Delo. (In Russ.)

17. Strauss A., Corbin J. (2001) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.)

18. Strauss A., Corbin J. (eds) (1997) Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

19. Territory of Broken Ears: Why Freestyle Wrestling is So Popular in Dagestan. (2020) Zapovednik [Nature Reserve]. February 27. URL: https://zapovednik.space/material/territorijapolomannyh ushej (accessed 28.08.2021).

20. Vladimirova A. (2020) Sport as a Part of the State Propaganda System in Russia. Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper; University of Oxford. URL: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/202005/Sportspropaganda.Final%20Alexandra%20Vladimirova.docx%20%281%29.pdf (accessed 27.08.2021).

21. Wellard I. (2009) Sport, Masculinities and the Body. London: Routledge.

Система Orphus