Digital culture vs cultural originality? (from the experience of preserving Chinese cultural identity)

Balchindorzhieva, Oyuna B.; Zolkhoeva, Mariya V.

doi:10.31857/S013216250016858-6

Home

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Issue 3

Digital culture vs cultural originality? (from the experience of preserving Chinese cultural identity)

Annotation
Reviews
References

Digital culture vs cultural originality? (from the experience of preserving Chinese cultural identity)

PII

S013216250016859-7-1

DOI

10.31857/S013216250016858-6

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Oyuna B. Balchindorzhieva

Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Banzarov Buryat State University
Address: Russian Federation, Ulan-Ude

Mariya V. Zolkhoeva

Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Banzarov Buryat State University
Address: Russian Federation, Ulan-Ude

Journal name

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Edition

Issue 3

Pages

90-97

Abstract

This paper examines the problem of the own cultural identity maintenance in the context of modern processes of globalization, informatization and digitalization, so as the development of digital modernity in China. The article emphasizes such a feature in the process of formation of digital modernity in Chinese society as the actualization of tradition in modern digital culture. This feature manifests not as the archaization of culture and restoration of the past but as a harmonious interweaving of the modern with the traditional, the Western with the Chinese. The paper suggests that the possibilities for the synthesis of tradition and innovation are inherent in the very origins of Chinese civilization. The holistic worldview that has been repeatedly considered by the researchers of Chinese culture and philosophy is also of great importance. The authors considered it necessary to reflect the ideology of holism in the form that means ‘to be in agreement, having different views’, ‘striving for harmony while maintaining differences’.

Keywords

Chinese society, tradition, modernity, digitization, digimodernism

Received

15.09.2021

Publication date

28.03.2022

Number of characters

20477

Cite

GOST	Balchindorzhieva O., Zolkhoeva M. Digital culture vs cultural originality? (from the experience of preserving Chinese cultural identity) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2022. – Issue 3 C. 90-97 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250016858-6-1-en (circulation date: 07.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016858-6
MLA	Balchindorzhieva, Oyuna B, Zolkhoeva, Mariya V. "Digital culture vs cultural originality? (from the experience of preserving Chinese cultural identity)." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 3 (2022):90-97. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016858-6
APA	Balchindorzhieva O., Zolkhoeva M. (2022). Digital culture vs cultural originality? (from the experience of preserving Chinese cultural identity). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (3), pp.90-97 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016858-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 649

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Abramov V.A., Abramova N.A. Tsennostnyj potentsial kitajskogo «moguschestvennogo kul'turnogo gosudarstva» v proektsiyakh global'nogo razvitiya. M.: Vostochnaya kniga , 2014.

2. Van Tsyan'. Moda na vse kitajskoe // Kitaj. 2020. № 5. S. 64-65.

3. Gao Mo. Onlajn-obrazovanie // Kitaj. 2020. № 4.S. 58–59.

4. Kataeva O.V. Tsifrovizatsiya i virtualizatsiya zhiznennogo mira: otsenki i pozitsii // Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii. 2020. №6. S. 129–136.

5. Kirbi A. Smert' postmodernizma i to, chto posle // Metamodern. Zhurnal o metamodernizme; per. s angl. S. Onasenko. URL: http://metamodernizm.ru/the-death-of-postmodernism (data obrascheniya: 15.03.2020).

6. Li Van'li. Vliyanie drevnekitajskoj filosofskoj mysli na sovremennuyu zhizn' v Kitae: sotsial'no-filosofskij diskurs. Diss. … k. filos. n. Chita, 2020.

7. Mironov V.V. Platon i sovremennaya peschera big-data // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya. 2019. T. 35. Vyp. 1. S. 4–24.

8. Ni Tszyaotszyao. Fenomen kul'turnogo brenda v sovremennoj kitajskoj kul'ture. Diss. … k. filos. n. Chita, 2019.

9. Noskova V.B. Filosofiya chajnoj tseremonii // Diskurs Pi. № 1–2. 2010. S. 68–72.

10. Pavlov A.V. Obrazy sovremennosti v XXI veke: didzhimodernizm: retsenziya na knigu Alana Kirbi // Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2018. T. II. № 2. S. 197–212.

11. Speshnev N.A. Kitajtsy: osobennosti natsional'noj psikhologii. SPb.: Karo, 2017.

12. Syuj Khunbo. Osobennosti kitajskogo natsional'nogo kharaktera (chast' 2) // Molodoj uchenyj. 2011. № 3 (26). T. 2. S. 190–191.

13. Khu Yanli. Spetsifika globalizatsionnykh protsessov v kul'ture Kitaya Diss. … k. kul'tur. Vladivostok, 2016.

14. Tsuj Dinin', Yan Syueh, Gu Yan'vehn'. Spetsifika i tsennosti brendov kul'turnoj industrii // Kehtszi tszinzi shichan'. 2016. № 7. S. 81–85. (na kit.yaz.)

15. Bauer W. The China and the Hoping for Happiness. The Paradise. The Utopian. The Ideals. N.Y.: Izd-vo, 1973.

16. McDermott J. Those people we tried to cancel? They All Hang Out Together // NYTIMES. 2019. November. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/02/style/what-is-cancel-culture.html (data obrascheniya:13.09. 2021).

17. Wang Yilei, Feng Dezheng. History, modernity, and city branding in China: a multimodal critical discourse analysis of Xi’an’s promotional videos on social media// Social Semiotics. 2021. Vol. 1. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10350330.2020.1870405 (accessed 17.03.2020).