Polygamy in Dagestan in Optics of Public Opinion

Polygamy is not a rare form of family and marriage relations in the modern world, but it has become a revived reality in response to the challenges of the modern era and the crisis in Russia for Dagestan society. This issue attracts public and scientific attention by the inconsistency of practice of polygamy in Dagestan society. On the one side, the majority of the republic's residents perceived this process negatively and, on the other, polygamy entrenched in the system of family and marriage relations steadily. Why is this happening? There are issues of the harmonious implementation of the ideology of polygamy in modern Dagestan society from the point of view of the historically established tradition of polygamy and the future of polygamy institution in Dagestan taking into account the results of the author's sociological survey of residents of the republic (N = 507) in this article. Authors take into account the geographical position of Dagestan as northern, plain and southern zones of the republic and gender and age characteristics of the population, and level of education, religiosity, marital status and type of settlement. Authors concluded that polygamy in Dagestan largely deviates from the norms and principles polygamy in the Muslim tradition historically by results of the implemented empirical study, because of which the distorted form of polygamy becomes unacceptable even for the truly believing part of the population, accepting as norms of Islam practice of polygamy. The practice of polygamy developing in this logic has a most destructive effect on the traditional institution of the family in Dagestan, generating the dynamics of divorce and consolidating the destructive vector of the development of family and marriage relations.

Keywords

polygamy, family, marriage, archaization, family and marriage relations, Dagestan, Islam,

Received

16.02.2022

Publication date

18.03.2022

Number of characters

31798

Cite

GOST	Vereshagina A., Zagirova E. Polygamy in Dagestan in Optics of Public Opinion // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2022. – Issue 2 C. 117-128 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250016856-4-1-en (circulation date: 04.10.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016856-4
MLA	Vereshagina, Anna V, Zagirova, Elvira M "Polygamy in Dagestan in Optics of Public Opinion." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 2 (2022):117-128. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016856-4
APA	Vereshagina A., Zagirova E. (2022). Polygamy in Dagestan in Optics of Public Opinion. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (2), pp.117-128 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016856-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1121

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alimova B.M. (2008) Dialogue between the sexes in the modern Dagestan family. In: Gender relations in the culture of the peoples of the North Caucasus. Materials of the regional scientific conference. Makhachkala: 76–79. (In Russ.)

2. Al-Sharfi M., Pfeffer K., Kirsty A. Miller (2016) The effects of polygamy on children and adolescents: a systematic review. Journal of Family Studies. No. 22 (3): 272–286. DOI: 10.1080/13229400.2015.1086405.

3. Bibikova O.P. (2019) Polygamy in the post-Soviet space. Rossiya i musul'manskij mir [Russia and the Muslim world]. No. 3: 48–64. DOI: 10.31249 / rimm / 2019.03.03. (In Russ.)

4. Filyushkina D.V., Volkov Yu.G. (2014) Spiritual lumpenization of the russian society in the circumstances of globalization. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research. Vol. 21. No. 3: 449–452.

5. Gabaraeva M.R. (2020) Attitude towards polygamy in Dagestan: content analysis of social networks. Izvestiya SOIGSI. Shkola molodyh uchenyh [Izvestia SOIGSI. School of Young Scientists]. No. 24: 245–254. (In Russ.)

6. Galieva G.I. (2018) Ethnic characteristics of marriage and divorce in the Republic of Tatarstan. In: Culture, personality, society in the modern world: methodology, experience of empirical research. Materials of the XXI International conference in memory of prof. L.N. Kogan. Proceedings of the conference. Ekaterinburg: 1116–1125. (In Russ.)

7. Klimenko L.V. (2013) Gender dispositions in the modern North Caucasian family: modernization or archaization. Zhenshchina v rossijskom obshchestve [Woman in Russian society]. No. 1: 20–31. (In Russ.)

8. Khapchaev S.T. (2019) Polygamy in Islamic law: a comparative historical analysis. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region [Izvestia of higher educational institutions. Volga region. Social Sciences]. No. 2 (50): 71–85. DOI: 10.21685 / 2072-3016-2019-2-8. (In Russ.)

9. Lawson D.W., James S., Ngadaya E., Ngowi B., Sayoki G.M. Mfinanga, Mulder M.B. (2015) Polygynous marriage and child health in Tanzania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. No. 112 (45): 13827–13832. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1507151112.

10. Lurie S.V. (2016) Modern experience of polygamous families among Russian Muslims: a narrative analysis. Peterburgskaya sociologiya segodnya [St. Petersburg sociology today]. No. 7: 243–277. (In Russ.)

11. Radjabov O.R., Mirimova A.A. (2019) Objective and subjective factors of the emergence of polygamy in society. Social'no-gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and humanitarian knowledge]. No. 5: 104–108. (In Russ.)

12. Vereshchagina A.V. (2019) Archaic, traditional and modern in the space of family and marriage values and attitudes of young people in the South of Russia. In: Youth of the XXI century: the image of the future. Materials of the scientific conference XIII Kovalev readings on November 14-16, 2019 / Ed. editors: N.G. Skvortsov, Yu.V. Asochakov. Saint-Petersburg: Skifiya-print. P. 513–514. (In Russ.)

13. Zagirova E.M. (2021) Public opinion about the institution of polygamy (on the example of Dagestan). Gosudarstvennoe i municipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski [State and municipal management. Scholarly notes]. No. 2: 201–206. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2021-1-2-201-206. (In Russ.)

14. Zagirova E.M. (2021) Family Values and Traditions: Role and Functions (on the Example of Dagestan). Caucasian Science Bridge. Vol. 4. No. 1: 58–69. (In Russ.)