Digital Health: Deborah Lupton's Concept "Thinking with Care"

 
PIIS013216250014392-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250014392-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 4
Pages105-113
Abstract

The article discusses the digitalization of healthcare paying special attention to the concept of Australian sociologist Deborah Lupton. Health is one of the key areas for digitalization, where the benefits of using big data are obvious. New technologies are often а basis for modernizing national health systems      for they make possible to ensure availability of various medical services for different groups of population. Lupton analyzes both the benefits and risks of digitalization in this area, thereby highlighting the ambivalent character of the ongoing changes. She believes that it is necessary to recognize the interaction not only between people, but also between people and digital technologies. These new relationships form a new social reality. The Australian sociologist focuses her attention on new opportunities due to digitalization which can improve people's lives. From her point of view, the "concept of fear" still dominant in social research of digital technologies should be replaced by the concept of "thinking with care", according to which the data obtained as a result of using new technologies can and should be used for the benefit of humanity. Lupton demonstrates that digital data can help reorganize health care system and change patterns in people's behavior related to their health, in particular, through the ability to regularly monitor indicators of one's condition.

Keywordsdigitalization, social inequality, health, digital technologies, the concept of thinking with care, Deborah Lupton
Received10.04.2022
Publication date18.04.2022
Number of characters22825
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1097

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Vershinina I.A., Liadova A.V. (2020) Data in the digital world: New opportunities or additional risks? Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sociologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. Vol. 20. No. 4: 977–984. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-977-984

2. Vershinina I.A., Liadova A.V. (2021) Health and health care in Europe: Between inequalities and new opportunities. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 160–162. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S013216250014122-7

3. Dobrinskaya D.E. (2019) Digital society: sociological perspective. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya [Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. Vol. 25. No. 4: 175–192. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-4-175-192

4. Dobrinskaya D.E., Martynenko T.S. (2019) Perspectives of the Russian information society: Digital divide levels. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sociologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. Vol. 19. No. 1: 108–120. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-108-120

5. Lupton D. (2020) Fat. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)

6. Amoore L. (2020) Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. Durham: Duke University Press.

7. Barrett M.A., Humblet O., Hiatt R.A., Adler N.E. (2013) Big data and disease prevention: From quantified self to quantified communities. 2013. Big Data. Vol. 1. No. 3: 168–175. DOI:10.1089/big.2013.0027

8. Braidotti R. (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

9. Calvard T. (2019) Integrating Social Scientific Perspectives on the Quantified Employee Self. Social Sciences. Vol. 8(9). No. 262: 1–19. DOI: 10.3390/socsci8090262

10. Kitchin R. (2021) Data Lives: How Data Are Made and Shape Our World. Bristol: Bristol University Press.

11. Lupton D. (1996) Food, the Body and the Self. London: Sage Publications.

12. Lupton D. (1998) The Emotional Self: A Sociocultural Exploration. London: Sage Publications.

13. Lupton D. (2012) Medicine as Culture: Illness, Disease and the Body. Sage Publications.

14. Lupton D. (2013) Risk. London: Routledge.

15. Lupton D. (2014a) Digital Sociology. London; New York: Routledge.

16. Lupton D. (2014b) Apps as Artefacts: Towards a Critical Perspective on Mobile Health and Medical Apps. Societies. Vol. 4. No. 4: 606–622.

17. Lupton D. (2016a) The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Cambridge: Polity.

18. Lupton D. (2016b) The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society. Vol. 45. No. 1: 101–122.

19. Lupton D. (2017) Digital health: Critical and cross-disciplinary perspectives. London: Routledge.

20. Lupton D. (2018a) Fat. London: Routledge.

21. Lupton D. (2018b) ‘Better understanding about what's going on’: young Australians’ use of digital technologies for health and fitness. Sport, Education and Society. Vol. 25. No. 1: 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2018.1555661

22. Lupton D. (2019a) Data selves: More‐than‐human perspectives. New York: Polity Press.

23. Lupton D. (2019b) Toward a More-Than-Human Analysis of Digital Health: Inspirations from Feminist New Materialism. Qualitative Health Research. Vol. 29. No. 14: 1998–2009. DOI:10.1177/1049732319833368

24. Lupton D. (2020) Thinking with Care About Personal Data Profiling: A More-Than-Human Approach. International Journal of Communication. Vol. 14: 3165–3183.

25. Lupton D., Maslen S. (2019) How Women Use Digital Technologies for Health: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. Vol. 21. No. 1: e11481. DOI: 10.2196/11481

26. Mittelstadt B D., Allo P., Taddeo M., Wachter S., Floridi L. (2016) The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society. Vol. 3. No. 2: 1–21. DOI:10.1177/2053951716679679

27. Peek N, Sujan M, Scott P. (2020) Digital health and care in pandemic times: impact of COVID-19. British Medical Journal of Health & Care Informatics. Vol. 27: e100166. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100166

28. Petracci M., Schwarz P., Ma V., Antelo S., Diz A.-M. (2017) Doctor–patient relationships amid changes in contemporary society: a view from the health communication field. Health Sociology Review. Vol. 26. No. 3: 266–79.

29. Sadowski J. (2020) Too smart: How digital capitalism is extracting data, controlling our lives, and taking over the world. Cambridge: MIT Press.

30. Saxena A., Brault N., Rashid S. (2021) Big Data and Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare Applications. CRC Press.

31. Schüll N. (2016) Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties. Vol. 11. No. 3: 317–33.

32. Schwab K. (2017) The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Publishing Group.

33. Stephens M. (2020) A geospatial infodemic: Mapping Twitter conspiracy theories of COVID-19. Dialogues in Human Geography. Vol. 10. No. 2: 276–281.

34. Temiz Y., Lovchik R., Kaigala G., Delamarche E. (2015) Lab-on-a-chip devices: How to close and plug the lab? Microelectronic Engineering. Vol. 132: 156-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2014.10.013

35. Thrift N. (2005) Knowing capitalism. London: Sage Publications.

36. Whitelaw S., Mamas M., Topol E., Van Spall H. (2020) Applications of digital technology in COVID-19 pandemic planning and response. The Lancet. Digital Health. Vol. 2. No. 8: 435–440.

37. Zuboff S. (2015) Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology. Vol. 30. No. 1: 75–89.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up