Post-Marxism in Sociology. Part II

 
PIIS013216250014311-5-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250014311-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Prof.; Leading Researcher, Head of the Department of Social Philosophy
Affiliation:
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Institute of Philosophy RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 5
Pages129-138
Abstract

In the second part of the study of the historical dynamics of the concept of "post-Marxism" in sociology the author notes that with the collapse of communism different Marxists begin to conceptualize the term in their own way. At the same time, two trends in the use of the concept (self-description and the accusation of "revisionism"), originating in the 1980’s, persisted until the late 1990’s, when the concept became analytically important for sociology and finally lost its negative connotations. The paper states that academic works on post-Marxism of the 2000’s and 2010’s can be divided into two categories. In the first one, researchers attempt to independently theorize the concept. In the second category scholars try to describe post–Marxism as a sociological "tradition" based on the selected criteria, the genealogy of which the authors see in the theories of Rosa Luxemburg, Cornelius Castoriadis, but most often in the book "Hegemony and Socialist Strategy" by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe. There is no consensus among sociologists regarding the use of the concept of "post-Marxism". For example, sociologist Oliver Harrison believes that it is necessary to decide who is a post-Marxist and who is not, in each specific case. The author of the article comes to the conclusion that today almost any Marxist sociologist working in the paradigm of Marxist sociology can be called a post-Marxist, especially since even among radical thinkers there seems to be an understanding that Marxism and post-Marxism cannot be separated. After all, post-Marxism remains Marxism.

Keywordstheoretical sociology, Marxism, post-Marxism, ex-Marxism, capitalism, practical philosophy
Received25.05.2021
Publication date28.06.2021
Number of characters32430
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1073

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aronson R. (1995) After Marxism. New York: Guilford Press.

2. Barrett M. (1991) The Politics of Truth: From Marx to Foucault. Cambridge: Polity.

3. Bidet J., Kouvelakis S. (2008) Introduction: Marxism, Post-Marxism, Neo-Marxisms. In: Bidet J., Kouvélakis E. (eds) Critical companion to contemporary Marxism. Leiden – Boston: Brill: хi–xvi.

4. Boucher G. (2008) The Charmed Circle of Ideology. A Critique of Laclau and Mouffe, Butler and Žižek. Melbourne: re.press.

5. Boucher G. (2021) Ernesto Laclau (1935-2014) and Chantal Mouffe (1943-). In: Callinicos A., Kouvelakis S., Pradella L. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Marxism and Post-Marxism. New York – London: Routledge: 368–375.

6. Bowman P. (2007) Post-Marxism Versus Cultural Studies. Theory, Politics and Intervention. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.

7. Breckman W. (2016) Adventures of the symbolic: Post-Marxism and Radical Democracy. New York: Columbia University.

8. Callinicos A., Kouvelakis S., Pradella L. (2021) Introduction. In: Callinicos A., Kouvelakis S., Pradella L. (eds) (2021) The Routledge Handbook of Marxism and Post-Marxism. New York – London: Routledge: 1–22.

9. Cowling M., Reynolds P., eds. (2000) Marxism, the Millennium and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

10. Dean J. (2019) Communism or Neo-Feudalism? Logos [Logos]. No. 6: 85–116. (In Russ.)

11. Devenney M. (2004) Ethics and Politics in Contemporary Theory: Between Critical Theory and Post-Marxism. London: Routledge.

12. el-Ojeili C. (2010). Post-Marxist Trajectories: Diagnosis, Criticism, Utopia. Sociological Inquiry. No. 80(2): 261–282.

13. Goldstein P. (2005) Post-Marxist Theory: An Introduction. Albany: State University of New York.

14. Gorz A. (1989) Critique of Economic Reason. London: Verso.

15. Harrison O. (2014) Revolutionary Subjectivity in Post-Marxist Thought: Laclau, Negri, Badiou. Farnham: Ashgate.

16. Harvey D. (2021) The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into Origins of Cultural Change. Moscow: HSE (In Russ.)

17. Howson R. (2017) The Sociology of Postmarxism. New York – London: Routledge.

18. Jameson F. (2005) Actually Existing Marxism. Logos. No. 3(48): 208–246. (In Russ.)

19. Jones A. (1999) Dialectics and difference: against Harvey’s dialectical ‘post-Marxism’. Progress in Human Geography. No. 4: 529–555.

20. Keucheyan R. (2013) The Left Hemisphere: Mapping Critical Theory Today. London: Verso.

21. Makdisi S., Casarino C., Karl R., eds. (1996) Marxism Beyond Marxism. New York–London: Routledge.

22. McLennan G. (1996) Post-Marxism and the “Four Sins” of Modernist Theorizing. New Left Review. No. 218: 53-74.

23. Porpora D. (2019) The Theoretical Status of Marxism. RedFlora.org. URL: http://www.redflora.org/2019/09/blog-post.html (accessed 11.03.2021.) (In Russ.)

24. Rakovski M. (1978) Towards an East European Marxism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

25. Reynolds P. (2000) Post-Marxism: Radical Political Theory and Practice Beyond Marxism? In: Cowling M., Reynolds P. (eds) Marxism, the Millennium and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 257–279.

26. Sim S., ed. (1998) Post-Marxism: A Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.

27. Sim S. (2000) Post-Marxism: an intellectual history. London, New York: Routledge.

28. Stoyanovich S. (1990) From Marxism to Post-Marxism. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. No. 1: 145-154. (In Russ.)

29. Torney S., Townshend J. (2006) Key Thinkers from Critical Theory to Post-Marxism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

30. Tosel A. (2008a) The Development of Marxism: From the End of Marxism-Leninism to a Thousand Marxisms – France-Italy, 1975–2005. In: Bidet J., Kouvélakis E. (eds) Critical Сompanion to Сontemporary Marxism. Leiden – Boston: Brill: 39–78.

31. Tosel А. (2008b) The Late Lukács and the Budapest School. In: Bidet J., Kouvélakis E. (eds) Critical Сompanion to Сontemporary Marxism. Leiden–Boston: Brill: 163–174.

32. Webster F. (2004) Theories of the Information Society. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (In Russ.)

33. Wright E.O. (1995) What is Analytical Marxism? In: Carver T., Thomas P. (eds) Rational Choice Marxism. Houndmills е.а.: Palgrave Macmillan UK: 11–30.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up