The Effect of “Compassion Fatigue” in Practices of Media Consumption (the Case of the Attitude to the COVID-19 Problematization)

 
PIIS013216250012269-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250012269-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Theory and History of Sociology
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 6
Pages46-56
Abstract

The article presents the main results of the empirical study of the effect of “compassion fatigue” in the media consumption practices of active users of the Internet and social networks, conducted in the spring of 2020 by an online survey. The strategies of problematization of COVID-19 using by the media in current Russia were in our focus. The relevance of addressing this topic is due to two main factors: the shortage of research of complex and nonlinear relations between the media and the audience in the Russian sociological discourse, and the unprecedented medical and social situation, accompanied by infodemic. The manifestations of the public burnout, the main factors of its formation, as well as some socio-demographic differences, gender first, in the perception of news about coronavirus were discovered. As a result, an increase in tiredness and irritation among respondents in the first month of the epidemic is recorded. Its strongly statistical correlation with purposeful avoidance of information about the current situation indicates “compassion fatigue” of Internet users. The assessment of news about coronavirus as dramatic and sensational is a significant factor of negative emotions, while the intensity of media consumption does not play a key role. The obtained data indicate the resistance of active Internet users to strategies of dramatization of situation. The rather rapid emotional burnout of the audience in the first wave of the epidemic is explained by the fact that today “compassion fatigue” becomes an a priori attitude. So, modern media consumption practices can be described using the metaphor of surfing on the crest of information waves.

Keywords“compassion fatigue”, Internet users, media consumption, problematization, COVID-19, social networks, involvement
AcknowledgmentThis article was prepared with support from the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 18-18-00132.
Received20.06.2021
Publication date29.06.2021
Number of characters36105
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1353

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Лазарсфельд П.Ф., Мертон Р.К. Наркотизирующая дисфункция средств массовой коммуникации / Хрестоматия / Пер. с англ.; сост. И.Г. Ясавеев. Казань: Казан. ун-т, 2000. С. 185–186. [Lazarsfeld P.F., Merton R.K. (2000) Narcotizing dysfunction of mass communication. In: Mass Сommunication and Social Problems. Trasl. From Eng., Compl. by I.G. Yasaveev. Kazan: Kazansk. un-t: 185–186. (In Russ.)]

2. Borer T. A. (2012) Introduction: Willful ignorance – news production, audience reception and responses to suffering. In: Borer T.A. (ed.). (2012) Media, mobilization, and human rights: Mediating suffering. New York: Zed Books.

3. Haavisto C., Maasilta M. (2015) Towards a Journalism of Hope? Compassion and Locality in European Mediations of Distant Suffering. Critical Arts. Vol. 29. No. 3: 327–341. DOI: 10.1080/02560046.2015.1059548

4. Hilgartner S., Bosk Cl. (1988) The Rise and the Fall of Social Problems. A Public Arenas Model. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 94. No. 1: 53–78. DOI: 10.1086/228951

5. Hoijer B. (2004) The Discourse of Global Compassion: The Audience and Media Reporting of Human Suffering. Media, Culture and Society. Vol. 26. No. 4: 513–531. DOI: 10.1177/0163443704044215

6. Kinnick K.N., Krugman D.M., Cameron G.T. (1996) Compassion Fatigue: Communication and Burnout toward Social Problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Vol. 73. No. 3: 687–707. DOI: 10.1177/107769909607300314

7. Maier S.R. (2015) Compassion Fatigue and the Elusive Quest for Journalistic Impact: A Content and Reader-Metrics Analysis Assessing Audience Response. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Vol. 92. No. 3: 700–722. DOI: 10.1177/1077699015599660

8. McIntyre K. (2017) Motivating News Audiences: Shock them or provide them with solutions? Communication & Society. Vol. 30. No.1: 39–56. DOI: 10.15581/003.30.1.39-56

9. McIntyre K. (2019) Solutions Journalism. Journalism Practice. Vol. 13. No. 1: 16–34. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2017.1409647

10. Moeller S.D. (1999) Compassion Fatigue: How the Media Sell Disease, Famine, War and Death. New York: Routledge.

11. Ong J.C. (2014) «Witnessing» or «Mediating» Distant Suffering? Ethical Questions across Moments of Text, Production, and Reception. Television & New Media. Vol. 15. No. 3: 179–196. DOI: 10.1177/1527476412454687

12. Seu B. (2003) Your Stomach Makes You Feel That You Don’t Want to Do Anything about It’: Desensitization, Defense Mechanisms and Rhetoric in Response to Human Rights Abuses. Journal of Human Rights. Vol. 2: 183–196.

13. Tester K. (2001) Compassion, Morality and the Media. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up