Human Capital in Russia: Measurement Accuracy and Limitations of the Method

Occupation: Leading Researcher; Associate Professor
Affiliation:
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Edition

Issue 11

Pages

27-38

Abstract

Developed by the US economists human capital theory has become widespread in the social sciences. However, its application and critical revision are mainly related to relatively stable highly developed societies. The article discusses difficulties inapplying this theory to Russian society, which went through deep structural social and economic transformations in the late XX - early XXI centuries. The data of the International Program for the Assessment of Adult Competences (PIAAC) show distinctive features of human capital in Russia, its difference from those in OECD countries, and the retrospective dynamics of its accumulation. Three related issues are consecutively analyzed in the article. The first is consistency/inconsistency of formal diplomas and measured literacy. This is an attempt to determine how accurately the standard technique for measuring human capital works in the country. The second issue is how the loss or, on the contrary, the acquisition of skills occurs throughout life in several cohorts. These ongoing processes affect current state of human capital and may be particularly associated with deep socio-economic changes. And finally, the third problem is related to how efficiently obtained diplomas and competencies can be converted into wages in the Russian economy, what is the return on knowledge and skills on the labor market. The limitations of the theory of human capital application in Russian conditions are demonstrated.

Keywords

human capital, education, adult competences, PIAAC, comparative study

Received

07.07.2020

Publication date

22.12.2020

Number of characters

30058

Cite

GOST	Popov D. Human Capital in Russia: Measurement Accuracy and Limitations of the Method // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2020. – Issue 11 C. 27-38 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250010466-5-1-en (circulation date: 19.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010466-5
MLA	Popov, Dmitry S "Human Capital in Russia: Measurement Accuracy and Limitations of the Method." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 11 (2020):27-38. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010466-5
APA	Popov D. (2020). Human Capital in Russia: Measurement Accuracy and Limitations of the Method. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (11), pp.27-38 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010466-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1318

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Беккер Г.С. Человеческое поведение: экономический подход. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2003. [Becker G.S. (2003) Human Behavior: An Economic Approach. Moscow: GU VHSE. (In Russ.)]

2. Капелюшников Р.И. Человеческий капитал России: эволюция и стуктурные особенности // Вестник общественного мнения. Данные. Анализ. Дискуссии. 2005. № 4. С. 46–54. [Kapelyushnikov R.I. (2005) Human capital of Russia: evolution and structural features. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya [The Russian Public Opinion Herald]. No. 4: 46–54. (In Russ.)]

3. Кузьмина Ю.В., Попов Д.С. Функциональная грамотность взрослых и их включенность в общество в России // Социологические исследования. 2015. № 7. С. 48–57. [Kuzmina Yu.V., Popov D.S. (2015) Functional literacy of adults and their inclusion in society in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 48–57. (In Russ.)]

4. Лукьянова А.Л. Отдача от образования: что показывает мета-анализ // Экономический журнал ВШЭ. 2010. № 3. С. 326–348. [Lukyanova A.L. (2010) Return on education: a meta-analysis shows. Ekonomicheskij zhurnal VSHE [HSE Economic Journal]. No. 3: 326–348. (In Russ.)]

5. Попов Д.С., Стрельникова А.В. 2017. Работа, образование и грамотность в России: проблема неконсистентности // Журнал исследований социальной политики. Т. 15. № 2. С. 267–280. [Popov D.S., Strelnikova A.V. (2017) Work, education and literacy in Russia: the problem of inconsistency. Zhurnal Issledovaniy Sotsial'noy Politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies]. Vol. 15. No. 2: 267–280. (In Russ.)]

6. Рощин С.Ю., Рудаков В.Н. Измеряют ли стартовые заработные платы выпускников качество образования? Обзор российских и зарубежных исследований // Вопросы образования. № 1. С. 137–181. [Roshchin S.Yu., Rudakov V.N. (2015) Do graduate starting salaries measure the quality of education? Review of Russian and foreign studies. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies Moscow]. No. 1: 137–181. (In Russ.)]

7. Arum R., Roksa J. (2014) Aspiring Adults Adrift: Tentative Transitions of College Graduates. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

8. Becker G., Murphy K. (2003) Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

9. Boliver V. (2011) Expansion, Differentiation, and the Persistence of Social Class Inequalities in British Higher Education. Higher Education. Vol. 61: 229–242.

10. Borgen N.T. (2015) College Quality and the Positive Selection Hypothesis: The ‘Second Filter’ on Family Background in High-Paid Jobs. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. Vol. 39: 32–47.

11. Bourdieu P., Passeron J.-P. (1990) Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.

12. Cheidvasser S., Benitez-Silva H. (2007) The educated Russian's curse: returns to education in the Russian Federation during the 1990s. Labour. Vol. 21. № 1: 1–41.

13. Collins R. (1979) The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

14. Glomm G., Ravikumar B. (1992) Public Versus Private Investment in Human Capital: Endogenous Growth and Income Inequality. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 100. No. 4: 818–834.

15. Hansen H. (2011) Rethinking Certification Theory and the Educational Development of the United States and Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. Vol. 29: 31–55.

16. Hanushek E.A., Woessmann L. (2010) The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement. In: Handbook of the Economics of Education. Ed. by Eric A. Hanushek, Stephen Machin, Ludger Woessmann. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North Holland.

17. Hanushek E.A., Schwerdt G., Wiederhold S., Woessmann L. (2015) Returns to skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC. European Economic Review. Vol. 73, January: 103–130.

18. Marginson S. (2017) Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 44. No. 3: 1–15.

19. Mincer J. (1958) Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 66. No. 4: 281–302.

20. Mincer J. (1970) The distribution of labor incomes: a survey with special reference to the human capital approach. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 8. No. 1: 1–26.

21. OECD (2009) PIAAC Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments: A Conceptual Framework. OECD Education Working Papers No. 36. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/220262483674

22. OECD (2013) OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. OECD Publishing, Paris.

23. OECD (2016) Technical report of the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) (2nd edition). Paris: OECD Publishing. URL: http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/PIAAC_Technical_Report_2nd_Edition_Full_Report.pdf (accessed 14.08.2020).

24. Spence M. (1973) Job Market Signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 87. No. 3: 355–374.

25. Spence M. (1974) Competitive and optimal responses to signals: An analysis of efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory. Vol. 7. Is. 3: 296–332.

26. Triventi M. (2013) The Role of Higher Education Stratification in the Reproduction of Social Inequality in the Labor Market. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. Vol. 32: 45–63.

27. Wolniak G.C., Seifert T.A., Reed E.J., Pascarella E.T. (2008) College Majors and Social Mobility. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. Vol. 26: 123–139.