Market and Property: Socio-Economic Lessons of the Pandemia

 
PIIS013216250009711-5-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250009711-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor at Department of Political Economy of Faculty of Economics, Director of Center for Modern Marxist Studies at Faculty of Philosophy; Chief Researcher
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Head of the Laboratory for Comparative Research of Socio-Economic Systems
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 8
Pages145-157
Abstract

The authors explore the nature of the transformation of the main public institutions under a pandemic, focusing on the analysis of changes in the system of socio-economic relations. It is noted that the first symptoms of the global crisis arose before the pandemic and were further intensified. Based on the first empirical data on the consequences of a pandemic, the thesis is proved, developing by authors earlier, that market coordination relations are substantially complemented directly by public regulation. Changes in property relations and relevant contradictions in labor relations are revealed. The interests of various social strata and new impulses of income redistribution, reducing inequality, solidarity, and transformation in the system of values and motivation of the person are shown. A number of measures in the field of socio-economic policy and reforming institutions aimed at developing an optimal strategy for overcoming the crisis are proposed.

Keywordscrisis, сoronavirus COVID-19, inequality, market, solidarity, justice, human being
Received16.05.2020
Publication date15.09.2020
Number of characters37691
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1389

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Amin S. (2004) The Liberal Virus: Permanent War and the Americanization of the World. Monthly Review Press.

2. Amin S. (2010) The Law of Worldwide Value. 2nd edition. New York: Monthly Review Press.

3. Antipina O.N. (2014) Economy and happiness: a paradoxical relationship. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Academic Papers of Free Economic Society of Russia]. Vol. 181. No. 2: 45–60. (In Russ.)

4. Baudrillard J. (1981) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Telos Press Publishing.

5. Bodrunov S.D. (2018) Noonomy. Moscow: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya. (In Russ.)

6. Buzgalin F.V. (2019) The state in the XXI century economy: political economy interpretation. Ekomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii [Economic science of contemporary Russia]. No. 3: 7–18. (In Russ.)

7. Buzgalin A.V. (2018) Late capitalism and its limits: dialectics of productive forces and production relations (to the 200th birth anniversary of Karl Marx). Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems of Political Economy]. No. 2: 10–38. (In Russ.)

8. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2016) Theory of systematically development (regularity) and objectives of the development of selective planning in market economy. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems of Political Economy]. No. 1: 21–43. (In Russ.)

9. Engels F. (1961) The development of socialism from utopia to science. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 19. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. (In Russ.)

10. Executive Office of the President (2019). ‘Markets versus Socialism’. In: Executive Office of the President. Economic Report of the President, March 2019: Together with The Annual Report of the Council of Economic Advisers. Maryland: Bernan Press: 381–426.

11. Fromm E. (1990) To Have or to Be? Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

12. Gofman A.В. (2015) Conceptual approaches to analysis of social unity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 29–36. (In Russ.)

13. Gorshkov M.K. (2017) Russian socium in the conditions of crisis development: a contextual approach (article 2). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 5–13. (In Russ.)

14. Grinberg R.S., Rubinstein A.Ya. (2013). Individual & State: An Economic Dilemma. Moscow: Ves' mir. (In Russ.)

15. Khessin N.V. (1964). The concept of “cell” and its methodological significance. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Questions of Economy] No. 7. (In Russ.)

16. Khessin N.V. (1975) On the historical and genetic approach to the study of the system of production relations of developed socialism. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economics]. No. 6: 3–17. (In Russ.)

17. Lapin N.I., Ilyin V.А., Morev M.V. (2020a) Extremal Inequalities and the Social State (part 1). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 4–17. (In Russ.)

18. Lapin N.I., Ilyin V.А., Morev M.V. (2020b) Extremal Inequalities and Social State (part 2). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 20–30. (In Russ.)

19. Petukhov V.V. (2016) Crisis and protection of the citizens’ labour rights. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 86–96. (In Russ.)

20. Polterovich V.M. (2017) Institutions of catching-up development and civil culture. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia]. Vol. 205. No. 3: 314–328. (In Russ.)

21. Polterovich V.M. (2018) Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Questions of Econony]. No. 12: 77–102. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-12-77-102 (In Russ.)

22. Volkov Yu.G. (2017) Solidary activity in Russian society: creative practice. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 41–48. (In Russ.)

23. Wallerstein I. (2004) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up