Digital Culture of the Russian Society and the State

 
PIIS013216250009401-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250009401-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head оf the Center for strategic social and socio-political research
Affiliation: Institute of Socio-Political Research of FCTAS RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: junior researcher fellow at the Center for strategic social and socio-political research
Affiliation: Institute of Socio-Political Research of FCTAS RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 5
Pages79-89
Abstract

The article analyzes the actual problems of digital society formation in Russia. The authors focus on the reserves of digital political culture of citizens as a problem factor that can accelerate or slow down the implementation of the national program "Digital economy" and "Strategy for the development of the information society in the Russian Federation in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030". The sociological analysis is based on the results of the research of the Center for strategic social and socio-political research of the ISPI RAS, data from surveys of the research company Mediascope and the analytical center of NAFI, as well as a generalization of empirical observations of the functioning of a number of large electronic platforms. According to the authors, despite the success of the introduction of information and communication technologies (ICT), Russian society and the state are only beginning to form a digital political culture in the system of existing socio-political relations and institutions. The use of modern ICTs by citizens is still mainly related to electronic markets for goods, banking and utilities, and recreation. The most important condition for successful solution of complex problems of digitalization of the Russian society is the understanding of individual citizens in General and civil society the social nature and significance of the implementation of information and communication technologies and formation on this basis of high motivation and digital culture for sustainable development.

Keywordsdigital political culture, digital economy, Internet, social inequality, digitalization, information deficit theory
Received23.04.2020
Publication date27.04.2020
Number of characters26980
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1418

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bauman Z. (2019) Retrotopia. Moscow: WCIOM. (In Russ.)

2. Donohue G.A., Tichenor P.J., Olien C.N. (1975) Mass media and the knowledge gap: A hypothesis reconsidered. Communication Research. Vol 2. Iss. 1: 3–23. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365027500200101 (accessed 20.02.2020).

3. Drobot V.A. (2018) Information component of modern world politics. Informatsionnoe obshestvo [Information society]. No. 2: 16–18. (In Russ.)

4. Levashov V.K., Afanasiev V.A., Novozhenina O.P., Shushpanova I.S. (2019) Express information. How are you Russia? XLVIII stage of sociological monitoring, November-December 2018. Moscow: Perspektiva. (In Russ.)

5. Lupton, D. (2016) The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

6. Chantal M. (2004) On an agonistic model of democracy. Logos [Logos]. No. 2 (42): 180–197. (In Russ.)

7. Sokolov I.A., Kolin K.K. (2009) Development of information society in Russia and actual problems of information security. Informatsionnoe obshestvo [Information society]. No. 4–5: 98–106 (In Russ.)

8. Wiener N. (1983) Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

9. Zaitsev A.V. (2013) Deliberative Democracy as an Institutional Dialogue Between Government and Civil Society. Sotsiodinamika [Sociodynamics]. No. 5: 29–44. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.5.689

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up