Социологические исследованияНомер 7Как и почему граждане оценивают свою защищенность от контролируемых государством рисков
Всего подписок: 0, всего просмотров: 1078
Оценка читателей: голосов 0
1. Блок Ф. Роли государства в хозяйстве // Экономическая социология. 2004. Т. 5. № 2. С. 37–56.
2. Лебедева Л.С. «Качество жизни»: ключевые подходы и структура понятия // Мониторинг общественного мнения // Экономические и социальные перемены. 2018. № 4. С. 68–80.
3. Масленникова Е.В., Добролюбова Е.И., Южаков В.Н. Статистика и социология результатов контрольно-надзорной деятельности // Экономическая политика. 2020. Т. 15. № 1. С. 90–107.
4. Юдина Т.Н., Бондалетов В.В., Мазаев Ю.Н., Бормотова Т.М., Долгорукова И.В. Общественная оценка деятельности полиции // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 4. С. 52–59.
5. Южаков В.Н., Добролюбова Е.И., Спиридонов А.А. Методические подходы к оценке контрольно-надзорной деятельности с позиции граждан как конечных бенефициаров // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2019. Т. 19. № 2. С. 337–351.
6. Boholm A. (1998) Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research. Journal of Risk Research. Vol. 1. No. 2: 135–163, DOI: 10.1080/136698798377231
7. Bouckaert G., Van de Walle S. (2003) Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of 'good governance': Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 69. No. 3: 329–343.
8. Cheng H. (2015) Factors influencing public satisfaction with the local police: a study in Saskatoon, Canada. Policing. Vol. 38. No. 4: 690–704.
9. Cummings C.L., Berube D.M., Lavelle M.E. (2013) Influences of individual-level characteristics on risk perceptions to various categories of environmental health and safety risks. Journal of Risk Research. Vol. 16. No. 10: 1277–1295.
10. Donahue A.K. (2014) Risky business: Willingness to pay for disaster preparedness. Public Budgeting and Finance. Vol. 34. No. 4: 100–119.
11. Eiser J.R., Bostrom A., Burton I., Johnston D.M., McClure J., Paton D., van der Pligt J., White M.P. (2012) Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Vol. 1: 5–16.
12. Han G., Yan S. (2019) Does food safety risk perception affect the public’s trust in their government? An empirical study on a national survey in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Vol. 16. No. 11. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16111874
13. He C., Han G., Liu Y. (2019) Food safety satisfaction in China and its influencing factors: Empirical study with a hierarchical linear model. Safety. Vol. 5. No. 1: DOI: 10.3390/safety5010017
14. Helliwell J.F., Huang H., Grover S., Wang S. (2018) Empirical linkages between good governance and national well-being. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 46. No. 4: 1332–1346.
15. Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. (2011) The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. Vol. 3. No. 2: 220–246. DOI:10.1017/S1876404511200046
16. Liu P., Ma L. (2016) Food scandals, media exposure, and citizens’ safety concerns: A multilevel analysis across Chinese cities. Food Policy. Vol. 63: 102–111.
17. Ma L., Christensen T. (2019) Government Trust, Social Trust, and Citizens’ Risk Concerns: Evidence from Crisis Management in China. Public Performance and Management Review. Vol. 42. No. 2: 383–404. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2018.1464478
18. Meng B., Liu M., Liufu H.Y., Wang W. (2013) Risk perceptions combining spatial multi-criteria analysis in land-use type of Huainan city. Safety Science. Vol. 51. No. 1: 361–373.
19. Mouter N., van Cranenburgh S., van Wee B. (2018) The consumer-citizen duality: Ten reasons why citizens prefer safety and drivers desire speed. Accident Analysis and Prevention. Vol. 121: 53–63.
20. OECD (2013) OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-Being. OECD Publishing, Paris (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-en).
21. OECD (2017) OECD Guidelines on Measuring Trust. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/9789264278219-en.
22. OECD (2018) OECD Regulatory Enforcement and Inspections Toolkit. OECD Publishing, Paris (https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264303959-en).
23. OECD (2019) Trust in Government. In: Government at a Glance. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/7c8e6ca7-en.
24. Qin F., Song, F. (2019) How much are the public willing to pay for the environmental protection: Evidence from Chinese general social survey data. Ekoloji. Vol. 28, No. 107: 3943–3950.
25. Sironi E., Bonazzi L.M. (2016) Direct Victimization Experiences and Fear of Crime: A Gender Perspective. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy. Vol. 22. No. 2: 159–172. DOI: 10.1515/peps-2016-0008.
26. Tertytchnaya K., De Vries C.E. (2019) The Political Consequences of Self-Insurance: Evidence from Central-Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia. Political Behavior. Vol. 41. No. 4: 1047–1070.
27. Vainio A., Mäkiniemi J.-P., Paloniemi R. (2014) System justification and the perception of food risks. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Vol. 17. No. 4: 509–523. DOI: 10.1177/1368430213503502.
28. Van Tol J. (2016) Dutch Risk and Responsibility programme. Some research into citizens’ views on a proportionate handling of risks and incidents. Journal of Risk Research. Vol. 19. No. 8: 1014–1021.
29. Yang K., Holzer, M. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review. Vol. 66. No. 1: 114–126. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x.
