Are International Stratification Scales Misrepresenting Russian Social Structure?

This article attempts to evaluate the applicability of international stratification scales having the widest currency (EGP, ISEI, CAMSIS, Treiman, E.O. Wright’s schema) to the Russian case. More specifically, I evaluate (1) the performance of scales in predicting income, educational attainment, lifestyle and consumption patterns; (2) the presence of interaction closure and intergenerational reproduction of membership in the groups identified by the scales. Empirically, the paper relies on the results of a representative survey of population of Saint Petersburg (N = 3200; June, 2019). General conclusion is that occupational scales (ISEI, Treiman, CAMSIS) explain essentially the same variance as an individual’s educational level, while Wright explains the same variance as income level. The EGP scale arguably produces the best result, although its predictive abilities are not going beyond that of a combination of «raw» socio-demographic variables (age, education, income). In the second part of the paper, I try to identify the aspects of the Russia’s social structure responsible for the shortcomings of the international scales. The major «suspect» is the relative independence of income (and occupational prestige closely related to it) from membership in status groups defined through their education, lifestyle, and interaction closure. Membership in status groups, but possible not for that in income strata, are likely to be reproduced inter-generationally.

Keywords

social stratification, social structure, socioeconomic status, occupational prestige, occupational scales, EGP scale, CAMSIS, ISEI, Wright’s stratification schema, Treiman’s scale

Received

17.04.2020

Publication date

15.09.2020

Number of characters

36719

Cite

GOST	Sokolov M. Are International Stratification Scales Misrepresenting Russian Social Structure? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2020. – Issue 8 C. 14-26 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250009301-4-1-en (circulation date: 23.03.2025). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009301-4
MLA	Sokolov, Mikhail M "Are International Stratification Scales Misrepresenting Russian Social Structure?." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 8 (2020):14-26. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009301-4
APA	Sokolov M. (2020). Are International Stratification Scales Misrepresenting Russian Social Structure?. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (8), pp.14-26 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009301-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1458

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Бессуднов А.Р. Социально-профессиональный статус в современной России // Мир России. Социология. Этнология. 2009. № 2. С. 89–115. [Bessudnov A. (2009) Socio-professional status in contemporary Russia. Mir Rossii [The Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology.] No. 2: 89–15 (In Russ.)]
2. Ощепков А.Ю. Неравенство в заработках. Роль профессии // Препринт WP3/2011/03. М.: ВШЭ, 2011. [Oschepkov A. (2011) Income inequality. The role of occupation. Working paper WP3/2011/03. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)]
3. Тихонова Н.Е. Социальная структура современной России: мифы и реальность. М.: ИС РАН, 2014. [Tikhonova N. (2014) Social structure of present-day Russia: Myths and reality. Moscow: IS RAN. (In Russ.)]
4. Тарусин М.А. Реальная Россия: социальная стратификация современного российского общества. М.: ИОП: Эксперт, 2006. [Tarussin M. (2006) Real Russia: Social stratification of contemporary Russian society. Moscow: IOP: Ekspert. (In Russ.)]
5. Blau P.M., Duncan O.D. (1967) The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley and Sons
6. Bihagen E., Lambert P. (2018) Can class and status really be disentangled? Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. Vol. 58: 1–10.
7. Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: The Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
8. Chan T.W., Goldthorpe J.H. (2004) Is there a status order in contemporary British society? Evidence from the occupational structure of friendship. European Sociological Review. Vol. 20. No. 5: 383–401.
9. Chan T.W., Goldthorpe J.H. (2007) Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. American sociological review. Vol. 72. No. 4: 512–532.
10. Flemmen P.M., Jarness V., Rosenlund L. (2019) Class and status: on the misconstrual of the conceptual distinction and a neo‐Bourdieusian alternative. The British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 70. No. 3: 816–866.
11. Ganzeboom H., de Graaf P., Treiman D. (1992) Standard International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status. Social Science Research. Vol. 21. No. 1: l–56.
12. Ganzeboom H.B., Treiman D.J. (1996) Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research. Vol. 25. No. 3: 201–239.
13. Goldthorpe J.H. (1996) Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: the case of persisting differentials in educational attainment. British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 46. No. 2: 481–505.
14. Goldthorpe J.H., McKnight A. (2006) The economic basis of social class. In: S. Morgan, D. Grusky, G. Fields (eds.) Mobility and inequality: Frontiers of research in sociology and economics. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 109–136.
15. Grusky D. (2005) Foundations of a Neo-Durkheimian class analysis. In: E.O. Wright (ed.) Approaches to Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 51–81.
16. Laumann E.O., Guttman L. (1966) The relative associational contiguity of occupations in an urban setting. American Sociological Review. Vol. 31. No. 1: 169–178.
17. Sokolov M. (2019) Cultural capital and social revolution: Arts consumption in a major Russian city, 1991–2017. Poetics, Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts. Vol. 72. No. 1: 1–16.
18. Weber M. (1978) Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. Part 1. 299–307.
19. Weeden K.A., Grusky D.B. (2005) The case for a new class map. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 111. No. 1: 141–212.
20. Weeden K.A., Grusky D.B. (2012) The Three Worlds of Inequality. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 117. No. 6: 1723–1785.
21. Wright E.O., Costello C., Hachen D., Sprague J. (1982) The American class structure. American Sociological Review. Vol. 47. No. 3: 709–726.
22. Wright E.O. (1989) The comparative project on class structure and class consciousness: An overview. Acta Sociologica. Vol. 32. No. 1: 3–22.