Number of purchasers: 0, views: 2224
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Антонов А.И. Микросоциология семьи (методология исследования структур и процессов). М.: Nota Bene, 1998. [Antonov A.I. (1998) Microsociology of the Family (Methodology of Structure and Process Studies). Moscow. Nota Bene. (In Russ.)].
2. Безрукова А.Н., Самойлова В.А. Отцовский отпуск в России: мечты или реальность? // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 7. С. 116–125. [Bezrukova O. Samoylova V. (2017) Paternity Leave in Russia: a Dream or Reality? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 116–125. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517070133.
3. Albrecht С., Fichtl A. Redler P. (2017) Fathers in Charge? Parental Leave Policies for Fathers in Europe. ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich. Vol. 15. No. 1: 49–51.
4. Anderson Th., Kohler H.-P. (2015) Low Fertility, Socioeconomic Development, and Gender Equity. Population and Development Review. Vol. 41. No. 3: 381–407.
5. Andersson G. (1999) Childbearing Trends in Sweden 1961–1997. European Journal of Population. Vol. 15. No. 1: 1–24.
6. Banfield E. (1958) with the assistance of L. Banfield. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
7. Chang Kyung-Sup, Song Min-Youn (2010) The Stranded Individualizer under Compressed Modernity: South Korean Women in Individualization without Individualism. British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 61. No. 3: 541–564.
8. Chzhen Y., Gromada A. Gwyther R. (2019) Are the World’s Richest Countries Family Friendly? Policy in the OECD and EU. Florence: UNICEF.
9. Comolli Ch. (2017) The Fertility Response to the Great Recession in Europe and the United States: Structural Economic Conditions and Perceived Economic Uncertainty. Demographic Research. Vol. 36. Article 51: 1549–1600.
10. Earles K. (2011) Swedish Family Policy – Continuity and Change in the Nordic Welfare State Model. Social Policy and Administration. Vol. 45. No. 2: 180–193.
11. Esping-Andersen G., Billari F. (2015) Re-Theorizing Family Demographics. Population and Development Review. Vol. 41. No. 1: 1–31.
12. Farré L., González L. (2017) The Effects of Paternity Leave on Fertility and Labor Market Outcomes. Universitat Pompeu Fabra Economics Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 1572. Barcelona.
13. Ginsborg P. (2003) Italy and its Discontents 1981–2001. London: Penguin.
14. Ochiai E. (2011) Unsustainable Societies: the Failure of Familialism in East Asia’s Compressed Modernity. Historical Social Research. Vol. 36. No. 2: 219–245.
15. OECD. (2016) Background Brief on Fathers’ Leave and its Use.
16. Population and Social Security in Japan. (2019) National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. Working Paper No. 85.
17. Saraceno Ch. (2016) Varieties of Familialism: Comparing Four Southern European and East Asian Welfare Regimes. Journal of European Social Policy. Vol. 26. No. 4: 314 –326.
18. Seung Hyun Seo (2019). Low Fertility Trend in the Republic of Korea and the Problems of its Family and Demographic Policy Implementation. Population and Economics. Vol. 3. No. 2: 29–35.
19. Toivonen T. (2007) Is Japanese Family Policy Turning ‘Nordic’? Oxford: University of Oxford.