Nomological Explanation in Historical Sociology (the Case of Genesis and Flowering of Italian Humanism)

 
PIIS013216250008499-1-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250008499-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Chief Researcher in the Institute for Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Head of Department for Social Philosophy and Political Sciences of Novosibirsk State University; Professor of Department for International Affairs an
Affiliation:
Institute for Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Novosibirsk State University
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Address: Russian Federation, Novosibirsk
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 2
Pages115-127
Abstract

The article applies K. Hempel’s logical scheme for full-fledged academic explanation of the origin and flourishing of humanism in the Northern Italy city-states (15th–16th centuries). Large consolidated continuous ideological movements (including Italian humanism) arise not randomly but because of combined circumstances in various social spheres (from geopolitics to everyday practices). Author’s formulation of the “universal hypothesis” (for genesis of any cultural movements) uses Toynbееаn “challenge-response” scheme, the principle of positive reinforcement of successful response strategies, the concepts of legitimacy, social movements, and resource mobilization. The genesis of Italian humanism is conceptualized as a macro-event with a fixed set of well-known ideological characteristics (anthropocentrism, activism, the “renaissance” of Roman and Greek classics, hedonism, faith in magic, etc). Initial data include main challenges-threats and challenges-opportunities for the Italian elites and the papacy, characteristics of affordable cultural capital (Latin and Greek “antiquities”). Also ensuing cultural strategies were successful. The movement gained sources of replenishment by young newcomers, rich high-ranking patrons with plenty of cultural resources. Non-institutionalized channels of vertical mobility were open in diplomacy, papal bureaucracy, commerce, literacy, art, and education. The correspondence of these initial data for the late 15th century Italy with the universal hypothesis premises means an obligatory appearance of macro-events: emergence and flourishing of humanism as a cultural movement with given characteristics.

Keywordshistorical sociology, macro-sociology, logic of scientific explanation, Karl Hempel, social patterns in history, challenge-response, Italian humanism, papacy, geopolitics, cultural movements, Doomsday, legitimacy
Received27.02.2020
Publication date16.03.2020
Number of characters38386
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1287

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Baron H. (1960) The social background of political liberty in the early Italian Renaissance. Comparative studies in society and history. 11. No. 4: 440–451.

2. Carneiro R. (2006) A Theory of the Origin of the State. In: The Early State, its Alternatives and Analogues. Volgograd: Uchital’: 55–70. (In Russ.)

3. Collins R. (2015) Macrohistory. Essays in the Sociology of the Long Run. Moscow: URSS. (In Russ.)

4. Davis N. (2005) History of Europe. Moscow: AST: Tranzitkniga. (In Russ.)

5. Delumeau J. (1994) Horror in the West. Moscow: Golos. (In Russ.)

6. Delumeau J. (2003) Sin and Fear: The Emergence of a Western Guilt Culture, 13th-18th Centuries. Yekaterinburg: UrFU. (In Russ.)

7. EBE (1993-2003) - The Encyclopedic Dictionary of F. A. Brockgaus and I. A. Efron. 86 vols. St. Petersburg: POLRADIS, AOOT "Ivan Fedorov". (In Russ.)

8. Garen E. (1986) Problems of the Italian Renaissance. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

9. Hay D. (1961) The Italian Renaissance in its Historical Background. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

10. Hempel K. (2000) Function of general laws in history. Vremya Mira. The Almanac. Issue 1. The Historical Macrosociology in the 20th Century. Novosibirsk: NGU: 16‑31 (In Russ.)

11. Lachman R. (2010) Capitalists in Spite of Themselves: Elite Conflict and European Transitions in Early Modern Europe. Moscow: Territoria buduschego. (In Russ.)

12. Losev A. (1978) Aesthetics of the Renaissance. Moscow: Mysl’. (In Russ.)

13. Martines L. (1963) The social world of the Florentine humanists (1390—1460). Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

14. Lytle G.F., Orgel S. (eds) (1981) Patronage in the Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

15. Petrarch F. (1998) Philosophical and Polemical Works. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

16. Petrosillo O. (1997) The City Vatican. Vatican: Edizioni Musei Vaticani. (In Russ.).

17. Romanovsky N.V. (2018). Our Historical Sociology: Fruits and Worries. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 6: 79‑90.

18. Tarasova M.S. (1999) This Palace is Full of Miracles. The Residence of the Renaissance Nobility in the Perception of Contemporaries. In: The Culture of Renaissance and Power. Moscow: Nauka: 99–107. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up