Sociologization of Humanitarian Studies: Searching for Children Picturebook Definition

 
PIIS013216250008497-9-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250008497-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Dean. School of Culture and Arts
Affiliation: Transbaikal State University
Address: Russian Federation, Chita
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 2
Pages96-104
Abstract

The paper deals with the sociologization of human sciences. Sociologization stands for sociological methodology and terminology application to humanities topics research. Many scholars leave their fields of expertise for sociological accounts of studied phenomenon. On top of that, social relationships account for phenomena and their development scrutinized within human studies. I enumerate fourfold argument for sociologization as an objective process in human sciences. First, sociologization impacted many different fields quite distant from each other, such as history and theory of translation. Second, a crossing of sociology with a particular branch of human science is marked by emergence of a new discipline related to sociology, such as historical sociology and sociology of translation sticking to the above-mentioned example. Third, there might be different sociologized disciplines within one field of expertise, such as historical sociology of literature, sociology of text and social semiotics to investigate literary texts, which are a prime object of my analysis in the paper. Fourth, sociology tends to replace philosophy to become a new metalanguage within human studies. I demonstrate efficiency of sociological approach using the example of attempted picturebooks definitins as a children literature genre or visual art. Efforts to define picturebook by applying classical methodology of literary and visual studies had been unsuccessful because of (1) the structural and content similarity of sequential literature genres and (2) continuing artistic experiments by picturebook authors. It turns out that picturebooks and comics might have much more in common than it was thought previously. Therefore, scholars were caught in a terminological impasse. The sociological methodology, namely ideas of sociology of text, yields a distinction of picturebook from comics in the description of different reading situations two genres anticipate. Although researchers, analyzed in the paper, do not portrait their approach as a sociological one, the applied methods and used terms refer to sociology of text.

Keywordssociologization, sociology of text, cultural text, illustrated literature, picturebook, comics
Received27.02.2020
Publication date16.03.2020
Number of characters27143
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1394

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Рейтблат А.И. От Бовы к Бальмонту и другие работы по исторической социологии русской литературы. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2009. [Reitblat A.I. (2009) From Bova to Balmont and other works on the historical sociology of Russian literature. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russ.)]

2. Розов Н.С. Идеи и интеллектуалы в потоке истории: макросоциология философии, науки и образования. Новосибирск: Манускрипт, 2016. [Rozov N.S. (2016) Ideas and Intellectuals in Tide of History: Macrosociology of Philosophy, Science and Education. Novosibirsk: Manuskript. (In Russ.)]

3. Романовский Н.В. Социология и история: перспективы взаимодействия // Вестник РГГУ. Серия: Философия. Социология. Искусствоведение. 2010. № 3. С. 13‑29. [Romanovskiy N.V. (2010) Sociology and History: Prospects of Interaction. Vestnik RGGU [RSUH/RGGU Bulletin]. No. 3: 13‑29. (In Russ.)]

4. Савчук В.В. Феномен поворота в культуре XX века // Международный журнал исследований культуры. 2013. № 1. С. 93‑108. [Savchuk V.V. (2013) The Phenomenon of Turn in 20th Century Culture. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul'tury [International Journal of Cultural Research]. No. 1: 93‑108. (In Russ.)]

5. Скаф М. Комикс и книжка-картинка: границы визуально-литературных жанров // Детские чтения. 2016. № 10. С. 285‑303. [Scaff M. (2016) Comics and Picturebooks: On the Limits of Visual Literary Genres. Detskie chteniya [Children’s Reading]. No. 10: 285‑303. (In Russ.)]

6. Трубицын Д.В. Россия «договорная» и Россия «холопская»: опыт социологизации исторической концепции // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 6. С. 97‑107. [Trubitsyn D.V. (2019) “Agreement-Based” Russia and “Serf” Russia: Sociologizing a Historical Conception. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 97‑107. (In Russ.)]

7. Angelelli C. (2012) The sociological turn in translation and interpreting studies. Translation and Interpreting Studies. No. 7: 125‑128.

8. Barraclough G. (1978) History. In: Havet J. (ed) Main trends of research in the social and human sciences. P. II. V. I. The Hague, Paris, New York: Mounton Publishers/Unesco: 227‑487.

9. Bird E., Yokota J. (2017) Picturebooks and Illustrated Books. In: Kümmerling-Meibauer B. (ed) Routledge Companion to Children’s Literature. London: Routledge: 281‑290.

10. Eisner W. (1985) Comics and Sequential Art. Guerneville, CA: Eclipse.

11. Elton G. (1967) The Practice of History. Sydney: Sydney University Press; New York: Crowell; London: Methuen.

12. Kümmerling-Meibauer B. (2006) Illustration. In: Zipes J. (ed) The Oxford Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 276‑281.

13. Lewis D. (2001) Reading contemporary picturebooks: Picturing text. London: Routledge Falmer.

14. Marantz K. (1983) The Picture Book as Art Object: A Call for Balanced Reviewing. In: Bator R. (ed) Signposts to Criticism of Children’s Literature. Chicago: American Library Association: 152‑155.

15. McKenzie D. (1999) Sociology of the text. Cambridge: The University Press.

16. Nikolajeva M., Scott C. (2000) The Dynamics of Picturebook Communication. Children’s Literature in Education. No. 4: 225‑239.

17. Nikolajeva M., Scott C. (2001) How picturebooks work. New York, London: Routledge.

18. Nodelman P. (1988) Words about Pictures: The Narrative Art of Children’s Picture Books. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

19. Nodelman P. (2012) Picture Book Guy Looks at Comics: Structural Differences in Two Kinds of Visual Narrative. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly. No. 4: 436‑444.

20. Op de Beeck N. (2012) On Comics-Style Picture Books and Picture-Bookish Comics. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly. No. 4: 468‑476.

21. Painter C., Martin J.R., Unsworthy L. (2013) Reading visual narratives: images analysis of children’s picture book. Sheffield and Bristol: Equinox.

22. Palmer R. (2014) Combining the rhythms of comics and picturebooks: thoughts and experiments. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics. No. 5: 297‑310.

23. Salisbury M., Styles M. (2012) Children’s Picturebooks: The Art of Visual Storytelling. London: Laurence King.

24. Sanders J. (2013) Chaperoning Words: Meaning-Making in Comics and Picture Books. Children’s Literature. No. 23: 57‑90.

25. Sipe L. (2011) The Art of the Picturebook. In: Wolf S.A., Coats K., Ensico P., Jenkins C.A. (eds) Handbook of Research on Children’s and Young Adult Literature. New York: Routledge: 238‑252.

26. Tunnell M., Jacobs J. (2013) The Origins and History of American Children’s Literature. The Reading Teacher. No. 2: 80‑86.

27. Whalley J. (2004) The Development of Illustrated Texts and Picture Books. In: Hunt P. (ed) International Companion Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature. Vol. 1. New York: Routledge: 318‑327.

28. Wolf M. (2007) The Location of the ‘Translation Field’. Negotiating borderlines Between Pierre Bourdieu and Homi Bhabha. In: Wolf M. and Fukari A. (eds) Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 109‑119.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up