Circulation of Expert Knowledge in the Juridical Field: Encounters of Epistemic Cultures and Practices of Translation

The article is devoted to interaction of forensic experts and jurists as bearers of different epistemic cultures. Circulation of a forensic expert report represents production of knowledge in the process of interaction between epistemic cultures and its transition from one professional group to another. Drawing on approaches of contemporary sociology of science the author demonstrates that encounters of different viewpoints and practices are an essential part of production and presentation of expert evidence in legal proceedings. Employing Bourdieu’s theory of the juridical field allows the author to reveal an asymmetry of power relations within that field and a relatively weak position of forensic experts. The empirical basis of the study is formed by data of non-participant observation in several Russian courts and interviews with jurists and forensic experts. The article demonstrates an entanglement of structurally and epistemically defined disagreements between representatives of these professional groups. Translation as a form of explication of the results of forensic expert’s analysis is presented in the article as the main means of overcoming these disagreements. At the same time various tactics are used by forensic experts who have to take into account both the peculiarities of epistemic culture of jurists and structural characteristics of the juridical field.

Keywords

sociology of science, sociology of law, epistemic culture, juridical field, forensic evidence

Received

19.02.2020

Publication date

10.03.2020

Number of characters

34994

Cite

GOST	Maslovskaya E. Circulation of Expert Knowledge in the Juridical Field: Encounters of Epistemic Cultures and Practices of Translation // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2020. – Issue 1 C. 82-91 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250008326-1-1-en (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008326-1
MLA	Maslovskaya, Elena V "Circulation of Expert Knowledge in the Juridical Field: Encounters of Epistemic Cultures and Practices of Translation." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 1 (2020):82-91. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008326-1
APA	Maslovskaya E. (2020). Circulation of Expert Knowledge in the Juridical Field: Encounters of Epistemic Cultures and Practices of Translation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (1), pp.82-91 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008326-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1159

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Бурдье П. Социальное пространство: поля и практики. СПб.: Алетейя, 2005. [Bourdieu P. (2005) Social Space: Fields and Practices. St.-Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russ.)]

2. Латур Б. Наука в действии: следуя за учеными и инженерами внутри общества. СПб.: ЕУСПб, 2015. [Latour B. (2015) Science in Action: Following Scientists and Engineers within Society. St.-Petersburg: EUSPb. (In Russ.)]

3. Audren F., De Bellaing C. (2013) Bruno Latour’s Legal Anthropology. In: R. Banakar, M. Travers (eds.) Law and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing: 181–194.

4. Caudill D., LaRue L. (2006) No Magic Wand: The Idealization of Science in Law. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

5. Cole S. (2013) Forensic Culture as Epistemic Culture: The Sociology of Forensic Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. Vol. 44. No. 1: 36–46.

6. Derksen L. (2000) Towards a Sociology of Measurement: The Meaning of Measurement Error in the case of DNA Profiling. Social Studies of Science. Vol. 30. No. 6: 803–845.

7. Dezalay Y., Madsen M. (2012) The Force of Law and Lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and Reflexive Sociology of Law. The Annual Review of Law and Social Science. Vol. 8: 433–452.

8. Goodwin C. (1994) Professional Vision. American Anthropologist. Vol. 96. No. 3: 606–633.

9. Jasannoff S. (2006) Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. Vol. 34. No. 2: 328–341.

10. Knorr Cetina K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

11. Knorr Cetina K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

12. Koppl R. (2005) How to Improve Forensic Science. European Journal of Law and Economics. Vol. 20. No. 3: 255–286.

13. Kruse C. (2016) The Social Life of Forensic Evidence. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

14. Latour B. (2010) The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conceil d’État. Cambridge: Polity.

15. Latour B., Woolgar S. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

16. Lynch M., Cole S., McNally R., Jordan K. (2008) Truth Machine: The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

17. Nida E., Taber C. (2003) The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: Brill.