Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy

The article discusses some features of actant and non-actant metonymy, complementing their main differences. It is noted that the set and content of actants depends on the semantic valence of the verb producing Nomina actionis. Inactive metonymy, its activity and other features are due only to the existence of certain realities. It is also established that the meanings of some types of actant and non-actant metonymy are not embodied in verbal units and therefore are not marked in explanatory dictionaries.

Keywords

Actant and non-actant substantive metonymy, inversely directed metonymy (from actant to action), types of metonymy that do not generate verbal units

Received

16.12.2021

Publication date

11.03.2022

Number of characters

14080

Cite

GOST
MLA	Yermakova, Оlga P "Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy." Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 81.1 (2022):51-55. DOI: 10.31857/S160578800018922-0
APA	Yermakova О. (2022). Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy. Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 81(1), pp.51-55 DOI: 10.31857/S160578800018922-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 366

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Apresyan Yu.D. Leksicheskaya semantika. Sinonimicheskie sredstva yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1974.

2. Pokrovskij M.M. Izbrannye raboty po yazykoznaniyu / [Predisl. V.V. Vinogradova]. M.: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1959.

3. Ginzburg E.L. Konstruktsii polisemii v russkom yazyke. Taksonomiya i metonimiya. M.: Nauka, 1985.

4. Eryomin A.N., Petrova O.O. Substantivnaya metonimiya v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Teoreticheskie osnovaniya i modeli realizatsii. M.: Flinta, 2018.

5. Koroleva O.Eh. Metonimiya kak tip znacheniya: semanticheskaya kharakteristika i sfery upotrebleniya. Obninsk: Institut munitsipal'nogo upravleniya, 2002.

6. Rozina R.I. Semanticheskoe razvitie slova v russkom literaturnom yazyke i sovremennom slenge: glagol. M.: Azbukovnik, 2005.

7. Sandakova M.V. Metonimiya prilagatel'nogo v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Kirov, 2004.

8. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka pod redaktsiej prof. D.N. Ushakova. M.: Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya, 1935–1941.

9. Petrova O.O. O sinkretizme metonimii i analogii // Kazanskaya nauka. 2021. № 7.

10. Ermakova O.P. Semanticheskij ehllipsis ili semanticheskij sdvig (o razgovornom upotreblenii konstruktsij tipa posle seledki khochetsya pit', opozdal iz-za detej) // Yazyk: poiski, fakty, gipotezy. K 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika N.Yu. Shvedovoj. M.: Nauka, 2016.

11. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka s vklyucheniem svedenij o proiskhozhdenii slov / Otv. red. akademik N.Yu. Shvedova. M.: Azbukovnik, 2007.