views: 44
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Bolgov M. V. (2016), Extreme levels of Lake Khanka: natural variations or anthropogenic impact, Institute of Water Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 8, pp. 1–14. (In Russ.).
2. Bolgov M. V., Korobkina E. A. (2022), Assessment of the characteristics of the level regime of the transboundary Lake Khanka as a result of the implementation of design decisions for clearing the source of the Sungacha River, Water management of Russia: problems, technologies, management, no. 2, pp. 53–67. (In Russ.).
3. Volchek A. A., Petrov D. O., Kostyuk D. A. (2016), Algorithm for calculating the boundaries of the flood area for a river network with modeling of water distribution using a raster representation, Reports of the Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics, no. 5 (99), pp. 73–78. (In Russ.).
4. Georgievsky V. Yu. (2022), Water balance of Lake Khanka and its changes under the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors, St. Petersburg, State Hydrological Institute, 272 p. (In Russ.).
5. Gladkov A. N., Kopylov V. N. (2022), Geoinformation technology for modeling flood development scenarios on the river, Information technologies and information security in professional activities. Collection of scientific articles of the Interuniversity scientific and practical conference with international participation, Novosibirsk, General of the Army I. K. Yakovlev Novosibirsk Military Institute of the National Guard of the Russian Federation, pp. 30–34. (In Russ.).
6. Dugaeva Ya. Yu. (2021), Features of the passage of large floods on the Amur River, Ecological, industrial and energy safety. Collection of articles based on materials from the international scientific and practical conference, Sevastopol, Sevastopol State University, pp. 207–210. (In Russ.).
7. Kochina V. B., Zhebo S. V., Trofimets E. N. (2021), Forecasting zones of possible flooding in the Khabarovsk Territory using the QGIS geographic information system, Security service in Russia: experience, problems, prospects. Monitoring, prevention and response to natural and man-made emergencies. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference, St. Petersburg, pp. 61–66. (In Russ.).
8. Makhinov A. N., Liu Shuguan, Kim V. I., Makhinova A. F. (2023), Features of large floods on the Amur River during the period of high water content 2009–2021, Pacific geography, no. 1, pp. 64–74. (In Russ.).
9. Parygina E. A., Slepneva E. V. (2022), Establishing the boundaries of flood zones using GIS and spatial analysis of satellite images (using the example of small cities in the Irkutsk region), Geographical Sciences and Education. Materials of the 15 All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Astrakhan, Astrakhan State University, pp. 112–117. (In Russ.).
10. Presnyakova A. N., Pisarev A. V., Khrapov S. S. (2017), Study of the dynamics of flooding of the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain according to space monitoring data, Bulletin of Volgograd State University, no. 1 (38), pp. 66–74. (In Russ.).
11. Prokopova M. V. (2022), Assessing the danger of flooding in built-up areas based on the use of modern geographic information systems, Modern trends in construction, urban planning and territorial planning, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 23–32. (In Russ.).
12. Smirnova V. I., Sidorova E. A., Savinykh A. S. (2021), Methodology for satellite monitoring of flood zones in the Kirov region, Modern scientific research: current issues, achievements and innovations. Collection of articles of the 19 International Scientific and Practical Conference, Penza, Science and Education (IP Gulyaev G. Yu.), pp. 269–273. (In Russ.).
13. Analysis of low-cost UAV photogrammetry solutions for beach modelling and monitoring using the opensource Quantum Gis (2022), M. A. Eboigbe, D. B. Kidner, M. Thomas, N. Thomas, H. Aldwairy, International Archives of the Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 46, pp. 71–81.
14. Floods in the Niger basin — analysis and attribution (2014), V. Aich, B. Koné, F. F. Hattermann, E. N. Mülle, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 2 (8), pp. 5171–5212.
15. Future hot-spots for hydro-hazards in Great Britain: A probabilistic assessment (2018), L. Collet, S. Harrigan, C. Prudhomme, G. Formetta, L. Beevers, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 22(10), pp. 5387–5401.
16. Hallegatte S., Ranger N., Mestre O. (2011), Assessing climate change impacts, sea level rise and storm surge risk in port cities: a case study on Copenhagen, Climatic Change, vol. 104, pp. 113–137.
17. Ninghtyas D. (2022), Pemanfaatan Citra Penginderaan Jauh untuk Bencana Banjir, ResearchGate, vol. 1 (1), pp. 1–7.
18. Participatory risk assessment of pluvial floods in four towns of Niger (2023), M. Tiepolo, S. Braccio, E. Fiorillo, A. Galligari, G. L. Katiellou, G. Massazza, V. Tarchiani, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 84, pp. 1–16.
19. Smith J. A., Baeck M. L. (2015), Prophetic vision, vivid imagination: The 1927 Mississippi River flood, Water Resources Research, vol. 51, pp. 9964– 9994.
20. Wang C., Wan T. R., Palmer I. J. (2010), Urban flood risk analysis for determining optimal flood protection levels based on digital terrain model and flood spreading model, Visual Computer, vol. 26 (11), pp. 1369–1381.
21. Wang M., Zhen, H., Xie X. (2011), A 600-year flood history in the Yangtze River drainage: Comparison between a subaqueous delta and historical records, Chinese Science Bulletin, vol. 56, pp. 188–195.