views: 869
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Zhuk N. P. (2014), Interaction as the Factor of Innovation Development: Agglomeration Effects, Innovacii, no. 1 (183), pp. 32–36. (In Russ.).
2. Zamyatina N. Yu., Pilyasov A. N. (2017), Concept of proximity: foreign experience and prospects of application in Russia, Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, no. 3. pp. 8–21. (In Russ.).
3. Zemtsov S. P., Budaeva K. V., Klimanov V. V. (2016), Content and retrospective analysis of regional strategizing in Russia, Region: ekonomika i sociologiya, no. 6 (2). pp. 175–183. (In Russ.).
4. Katukov D. D., Malygin V. E., Smorodinskaya N. V. (2012), Institutional Environment in a Globalized Economy: The Development of Network Interactions, Moscow, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.).
5. Merkulov V. V., Shemyakina T. Yu. (2018), Management of innovative development of urban areas, Upravlenie, no. 2 (20). pp. 10–13. (In Russ.).
6. Mikhaylov A. S., Kuznetsova T. Yu., Peker I. Yu. (2019), Methods of spatial scientometrics in assessing the heterogeneity of the innovation space of Russia, Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania, no. 41 (5). pp. 549–563. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32744/pse.2019.5.39
7. Pilyasov A. N. (2012), Geographic knowledge economy: time to collect stones, World Economy and International Relations, no. 11, pp. 110–120. (In Russ.).
8. Turchina D. A. (2019), Urban Agglomerations: Global Trends, Nauchnye trudy Severo-Zapadnogo Instituta Upravleniya RANHIGS, no. 10 (2/39), pp. 208–215. (In Russ.).
9. Shamaeva N. P. (2015), The relationship of innovation and knowledge is a strategic condition for the creation of an effective cluster, Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment, no. 9 (1), pp. 67–73. (In Russ.).
10. Adams J. D., Jaffe A. B. (1996), Bounding the effects of R&D: An Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data, The Rand Journal of Economics, no. 27 (4). pp. 700–721.
11. Aghion P., Jaravel X. (2015), Knowledge spillovers, innovation and growth, Economic Journal, no. 125 (583), pp. 533–573.
12. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z. (2000), Geographical spillovers and university research: A spatial econometric perspective, Growth and Change, no. 31 (4), pp. 501–515. DOI: 10.1111/0017-4815.00142
13. Bottazzi L., Peri G. (2003), Innovation and spillovers in regions: evidence from European patent data, European Economic Review, no. 47 (4), pp. 687–710.
14. Burger M, Meijers E. (2012), Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity, Urban Studies, no. 49 (5), pp. 1127–1149. DOI: 10.1177/0042098011407095
15. Crescenzi R., Rodriguez-Pose A., Storper M. (2012), The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India, Journal of Economic Geography, no. 12 (5), pp. 1055–1085. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbs020
16. Csomós G. (2017), A spatial scientometric analysis of the publication output of cities worldwide, Journal of Informetrics, no. 11 (4), pp. 976–988. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.006
17. Döring T, Schnellenbach J. (2006), What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature, Regional Studies, no. 40 (3), pp. 375–395. DOI: 10.1080/00343400600632739
18. Fitjar R. D., Rodríguez-Pose A. (2011), Innovating in the Periphery: Firms, Values and Innovation in Southwest Norway, European Planning Studies, no. 19 (4), pp. 555–574. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548467
19. Frenken K., Hardeman S., Hoekman J. (2009), Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program, Journal of Informetrics, no. 3 (3), pp. 222–232. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.005
20. Frenken K., Hoekman J. (2014), Spatial Scientometrics and Scholarly Impact: A Review of Recent Studies, Tools, and Methods. In: Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., Wolfram, D. (eds), Measuring Scholarly Impact, Springer, Cham, pp. 127–146. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_6
21. Giersch H. (1979), Aspects of growth, structural change, and employment A Schumpeterian perspective, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, no. 115 (4), pp. 629–652.
22. Greunz L. (2003), Geographically and technologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European regions, Annals of Regional Science, no. 37 (4), pp. 657–680.
23. Inoue H., Nakajima K., Saito Y. U. (2017), Localization of knowledge-creating establishments, Japan and the World Economy, no. 43, pp. 23–29.
24. Inoue H., Nakajima K., Saito Y. U. (2019), Localization of collaborations in knowledge creation, Annals of Regional Science, no. 62 (1), pp. 119–140.
25. Levy R., Jegou L. (2013), Diversity and location of knowledge production in small cities in France, City, Culture and Society, no. 4 (4), pp. 203–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs.2013.06.003
26. Li D., Wei Y. D., Wang T. (2015), Spatial and temporal evolution of urban innovation network in China, Habitat International, no. 49, pp. 484–496. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.031
27. Li Y., Phelps N. A. (2016), Knowledge polycentricity and the evolving Yangtze River Delta megalopolis, Regional Studies, no. 51 (7), pp. 1035–1047. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1240868
28. Malecki E. (2010), Everywhere? The geography of knowledge, Journal of regional science, no. 50 (1), pp. 293–513.
29. Matthiessen C. W., Schwarz A. W. (1999), Scientific centres in Europe: An analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators, Urban Studies, no. 36 (3), pp. 453–477. DOI: 10.1080/0042098993475
30. Matthiessen C. W., Schwarz A. W., Find S. (2002), The Top-level Global Research System, 1997–99: Centres, Networks and Nodality. An Analysis Based on Bibliometric Indicators, Urban Studies, no. 39 (5–6), pp. 903–927. DOI: 10.1080/00420980220128372
31. Mikhaylov A. S., Kuznetsova T. Y. (2019), Scientometric mapping: on creating a database for innovation dynamics of urban settlements. Proceedings of The 13th International Days of Statistics and Economics, Prague, September 5–7. DOI: 10.18267/pr.2019.los.186.0
32. Moreno R., Paci R., Usai S. (2005), Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions, Environment and Planning A, no. 37 (10), pp. 1793–1812. DOI: 10.1068/a37341
33. Penco L. (2013), The Development of the Successful City in the Knowledge Economy: Toward the Dual Role of Consumer Hub and Knowledge Hub, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, no. 6 (4), pp. 818–837. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-013-0149-4
34. Simmie J. (1998), Reasons for the Development of “Islands of Innovation”: Evidence from Hertfordshire, Urban Studies, no. 35 (8), pp. 1261–1289. DOI: 10.1080/0042098984358
35. Varga A. (2000), Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity, Journal of Regional Science, no. 40 (2), pp. 289–309.