Out-of-home space as a source of basic and advanced needs

 
PIIS020595920002246-6-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920002246-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Researcher
Affiliation: Center for Contemporary Childhood Studies
Address: Russian Federation
Occupation: executive Secretary
Affiliation: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Address: Russian Federation
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 39 № 6
Pages27-36
Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of subjective perceptions of external and internal reasons for everyday leaving home and to the interrelations of these representations with home attachment, functionality and relevance of the home environment. The symbolic and everyday meaning of crossing the border “in home – out of home” is considered. The main internal and external reasons for everyday leaving home in modern youth have been identified. The study conducted with 245 respondents has shown the relationship between internal and external reasons for leaving home and basic/higher needs satisfaction in the home environment, functionality and relevance of the home environment. All the interrelations are gender-moderated. The polymodality of the relationship between a person and his home is also shown: home is seen as an environment in which basic needs can be met, and if this happens, the main reasons for leaving the home are attractors that promise satisfaction of higher needs. If the basic needs in the home environment are frustrated, the person seeks alternative spaces to meet them. The theoretical position that home is not universal as a resource for meeting all needs is argued: in order to maintain balance, a person needs access to other environments.

Keywordshome environment, home, home attachment, leaving home, home psychology, needs
AcknowledgmentThe study was carried out with the support of the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 14-18-02163).
Received22.12.2018
Publication date22.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 2002

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bochaver A. A. Predstavleniya o dome kak ehlement personal'nogo opyta // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. T. 36. № 4. S. 5–15.

2. Bystrova Ya. V. Simvolika stroeniya doma: sotsiokul'turnyj smysl // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Ser. 17. 2015. Vyp. 4. S. 102–111.

3. Lotman Yu. M. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb, 1998.

4. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Edinstvo sub'ekta i bytiya kak osnova estestvennoj psikhoterapii // Sub'ektnyj podkhod v psikhologii / Otv. red. Zhuravlev A. L., Znakov V. V., Ryabikina Z. I ., Sergienko E. A. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2009. S. 482–497.

5. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Narodnaya skazka kak sredstvo stikhijnoj psikhoterapii // Skazki narodov mira. Khrestomatiya. Uchebnoe posobie dlya uchitelej, vospitatelej i roditelej. M., 1996. S. 3–15.

6. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Bochaver A. A., Dmitrieva N. S., Reznichenko S. I. Dom kak zhiznennaya sreda cheloveka: psikhologicheskoe issledovanie. M.: Pamyatniki istoricheskoj mysli, 2016.

7. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Dmitrieva N. S., Reznichenko S. I., Kuznetsova V. B., Braginets E. I. Metod otsenki druzhestvennosti zhilischa: oprosnik “Funktsional'nost' domashnej sredy” // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. T. 36. № 4. S. 71–83.

8. Ovsyannikova V. V. Bazovaya yazykovaya metafora “Priroda – ehto dom” v estestvenno-nauchnykh tekstakh (na primere tekstov po obschej geologii) // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. T. 318. S. 41–43.

9. Olejnik A. N. Triangulyatsiya v kontent-analize. Voprosy metodologii i ehmpiricheskaya proverka //Metody sotsiologicheskikh issledovanij. 2009. № 2. S. 65–79.

10. Osorina M. V. Sekretnyj mir detej v prostranstve mira vzroslykh. 4-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 2008.

11. Poturaeva E. A. Metaforicheskie oboznacheniya kontsepta “dom” v russkoj yazykovoj kartine mira // Yazyk i kul'tura. 2010. № 1. S. 58–73.

12. Reznichenko S. I. Valeologicheskij potentsial privyazannosti k domu u vzroslykh lyudej // Klinicheskaya i spetsial'naya psikhologiya. 2016. № 3. S. 1–23.

13. Reznichenko S. I. Privyazannost' k mestu i chuvstvo mesta: modeli i fenomeny // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obschestvo. 2014. № 3. S. 15–27.

14. Reznichenko S. I., Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Kuznetsova V. B. Metod otsenki privyazannosti k domu // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2016. № 3. S. 498–518.

15. Filippova E. V. Dom kak fragment fol'klornoj kartiny mira (na materiale anglijskikh i russkikh narodnykh ballad): Dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Saratov, 2001.

16. Carp F. M., Carp A. A Complementary/congruence model of well-being or mental health for the community elderly // Human Behavior and Environment. V. 7. Elderly People and the Environment / Eds. I. Altman, M. P. Lawton, J. F. Wohlwill. New York, London: Plenum Press, 1984. P. 279–336.

17. Case D. Contributions of journeys away1 to the definition of home: An empirical study of a dialectical process // Journal of environmental psychology.1996. V. 16. P. 1–15.

18. Elsbree L. The rituals of life: Patterns in narrative. New York: Kennykat, 1982.

19. Gurney C. M. Half of me was satisfied: making sense of home through episodic ethnographies // Women’s studies international forum.1997. V. 30 (3). P. 373–386.

20. Holmes T. H., Rahe R. H. The social readjustment rating scale // Journal of psychosomatic research. 1967. V. 11. Is. 2. P. 213–218.

21. Lawton M. P. Environmentaltaxonomy: generalizations from research with older adults //Measuring environment across the life span / Eds. S. L. Friedman, T. D. Wachs. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999.P. 91–124.

22. Lawton M. P. Three functions of the residential environment // Journal of housing for the elderly.1989. V. 5 (1). P. 35–50.

23. Oswald F., Schilling O., Wahl H.-W., Gang K. Trouble in paradise? Reasons to relocate and objective environmental changes among well-off older adults // Journal of environmental psychology. 2002. V. 22. P. 273–288.

24. Pretty G. H., Chipuer H., Bramston P. Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity // Journal of environmental psychology. 2003. V. 23. № 3. P. 273–287.

25. Tuan Y. F. Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up