Differential diagnosis of cognitive and psychomotor development of children of four years

 
PIIS020595920000832-1-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920000832-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Educational Psychology
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 39 № 6
Pages59-75
Abstract

The study was aimed to define the indicators of cognitive and psychomotor development of 4-yearold children to identify the potential risk zone of possible developmental delay (DD). The study sample consisted of 628 4-year-old children from different educational institutions of St. Petersburg, including 575 typically developing children and 53 children with DD. For data collection the tool “Multifactor study of mental development” was used in form of test tasks (dichotomous 123 tasks), as a part of software complex for longitudinal researches, in the following areas: motor skills, cognitive abilities, social intelligence. A structural mathematical model was developed based on the results of the study allowing assessment of the probability of a child belonging to a Norm group or to a DD group. It was determined that four factors (scales) make the greatest contribution to the differential diagnosis of typical development from DD (in descending order of importance): psychomotor coordination, verbal and conceptual thinking, general awareness and short-term memory. The high accuracy of prognosis of child’s development was shown by means of the presented method regardless of age: for all sample of 4-year-olds, and for younger and their senior subgroups (not less than 95%). It was discovered that the main predictor of the child’s belonging to the Norm group or to the DD group was the G-factor (general abilities), the indicators of which are the selected four scales. The assumption was confirmed about the indirect influence of age on the prediction of the diagnosis: age directly affected the selected abilities, which, in turn, were indicators of the General ability factor. At the same time, the influence of age was revealed only in relation to a group of typically developing children, and to a greater extent – in relation to its younger subgroup. The test norms of development were elaborated for the general (total) scale of development and for the four selected scales, adequate throughout the age range of 4-year-olds, the validity and reliability of these scales were substantiated.

Keywordsg-factor, factor structure of abilities, developmental delay, norm, 4-year-olds
AcknowledgmentThe study was funded by the RFBR research project No. 17-06-00989/17-OGON “Longitudinal study of predictive patterns of delay in the psychomotor development of preschool children”
Received22.12.2018
Publication date22.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 2714

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Abutalipova Eh. N. Optimizatsiya putej differentsial'noj diagnostiki narushenij psikhicheskogo razvitiya detej v deyatel'nosti psikhologo-mediko-pedagogicheskoj komissii: Na materiale Respubliki Bashkortostan: dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2003.

2. Alekseeva M. M., Yashina B. I. Metodika razvitiya rechi i obucheniya rodnomu yazyku doshkol'nikov: Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. i sred, ped. ucheb. zavedenij. M.: Izdatel'skij tsentr “Akademiya”, 2000.

3. Valueva E. A., Grigor'ev A. A., Ushakov D. V. Dissinkhroniya kognitivnogo razvitiya u intellektual'no odarennykh detej: strukturno-dinamicheskij podkhod // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. T. 36. № 5. C. 55–63.

4. Veraksa A. N., Gorovaya A. E., Kisel' A. V. Vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya znakovykh i simvolicheskikh sredstv v obuchenii doshkol'nikov (na primere osvoeniya fenomena radugi) // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2014. № 2. S. 19–34.

5. Vlasova T. A., Pevzner M. S. O detyakh s otkloneniyami v razvitii. 2-e izd. M., 1973.

6. Vodop'yanova N. E., Nasledov A. D. Standartizirovannyj oprosnik “Poteri i priobreteniya resursov” dlya spetsialistov sotsionomicheskikh professij // Vestnik TvGU. Seriya “Pedagogika i psikhologiya”. 2013. № 4. S. 8–22. S. 16–17.

7. Goldobina O. A., Sokolov Ya. V. K probleme psikhicheskogo zdorov'ya detej rannego i doshkol'nogo vozrasta (po rezul'tatam skriningovogo kliniko-psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya // Rossijskij psikhiatricheskij zhurnal. 2004. № 3. S. 63–69.

8. Goncharova O. V., Sokolovskaya T. A., Kuranov G. V. Reabilitatsiya detej: printsipy i napravleniya // Pediatriya, prilozhenie k zhurnalu “Consilium medicum”. 2015. № 2. S. 5–9.

9. Dmitrieva T. B., Volozhin A. I. Sotsial'nyj stress i psikhicheskoe zdorov'e / Pod red. akademika RAMN prof. T. B. Dmitrievoj i prof. A. I . Volozhina. M.: GOU VUNMTs MZ RF, 2001.

10. Zlokazova M. V. Zaderzhka psikhicheskogo razvitiya (kliniko-psikhologicheskie, sravnitel'no-vozrastnye i reabilitatsionnye aspekty): dis. … d-ra. medits. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 2004.

11. Ivanova A. E., Miroshnikov S. A. Metodicheskie materialy k ehkspertnoj sisteme individual'nogo soprovozhdeniya “Longityud”. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta. 2001.

12. Ivanova N. N. Formirovanie opisatel'noj svyaznoj rechi u detej s sistemnym nedorazvitiem rechi // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2012. № 1. S. 260–270.

13. Kovalev V. V. Psikhiatriya detskogo vozrasta. 2-e izd. M.: Meditsina, 1995.

14. Korbinskij B. A. Kontinuum perekhodnykh sostoyanij organizma i monitoring dinamiki zdorov'ya detej. M.: Detstomizdat, 2000. S. 63.

15. Lubovskij V. I., Korobejnikov I. A., Valyavko S. M. Novaya kontseptsiya psikhologicheskoj diagnostiki narushenij razvitiya // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2016. T. 21. № 4. C. 50–60.

16. Lubovskij V. I. Psikhologicheskie problemy diagnostiki anomal'nogo razvitiya detej. M.: Pedagogika, 1989.

17. Mezhdunarodnaya klassifikatsiya boleznej 10-go peresmotra. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://mkb?10.com/ (data obrascheniya: 17.08.2017).

18. Mikadze Yu. V. Nejropsikhologiya detskogo vozrasta: Uchebnoe posobie. SPb.: Piter, 2008.

19. Nasledov A. D. IBM SPSS20 i AMOS: professional'nyj statisticheskij analiz dannykh. SPb.: Piter, 2013.

20. Obukhova E. Yu., Stroganova T. A., Grachev V. V. Narusheniya vnimaniya u detej s osobennostyami razvitiya // Voprosy psikhologii. 2008. № 3. S. 61–70.

21. Obukhova L. F. Detskaya (vozrastnaya) psikhologiya. Uchebnik. M.: Rossijskoe pedagogicheskoe agentstvo. 1996.

22. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskaya diagnostika. ucheb.posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenij / Pod red. I. Yu. Levchenko, S. D. Zabramnoj i dr. M.: Izdatel'skij tsentr “Akademiya”, 2003.

23. Salikhova N. V. Psikhologicheskie aspekty sotsial'noj adaptatsii detej s ZPR v usloviyakh integrirovannoj gruppy doshkol'nikov: dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk. Samara, 2003.

24. Sedokova M. L. Vozrastnaya anatomiya i fiziologiya: uch. posob. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo gos. ped. un-ta, 2009.

25. Semenova L. K., Vasil'eva V A., Tsekhmistrenko TA. Strukturnye preobrazovaniya kory bol'shogo mozga cheloveka v postnatal'nom ontogeneze / Strukturno funktsional'naya organizatsiya razvivayuschegosya mozga. L.: Nauka, 1990. S. 8.

26. Fadina G. V. Diagnostika i korrektsiya zaderzhki psikhicheskogo razvitiya detej starshego doshkol'nogo vozrasta: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie / G. V. Fadina. Balashov: Nikolaev, 2004.

27. Farber D. A., Bezrukikh M. M. Metodologicheskie aspekty izucheniya fiziologii razvitiya rebenka // Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2001. T. 27. № 5. S. 8–16.

28. Farber D. A., Beteleva T. G. Formirovanie sistemy zritel'nogo vospriyatiya v ontogeneze // Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2005. T. 31. № 5. S. 26–36.

29. Farber D. A., Beteleva T. G., Gorev A. S. i dr. Funktsional'naya organizatsiya razvivayuschegosya mozga i formirovanie kognitivnoj deyatel'nosti // Fiziologiya razvitiya rebenka (Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty) / Pod red. M. M. Bezrukikh i D.A Farber. M.: Obrazovanie ot A do Ya. 2000. S. 82.

30. Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki, dannye na 01.01.2017 goda URL: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/population/disabilities/# (data obrascheniya: 01.09.2017).

31. Shevchenko S. G. Diagnostika i korrektsiya zaderzhki psikhicheskogo razvitiya u detej: posobie dlya uchitelej i spetsialistov korrektsionno-razvivayuschego obucheniya. M.: Arkti, 2001.

32. Shmelev A. G. Prakticheskaya testologiya. Testirovanie v obrazovanii, prikladnoj psikhologii i upravlenii personalom. M.: OOO “IPTs “Maska”, 2013. S. 271–273.

33. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook For Diagnosis And Treatment, Third Edition Russell A. Barkley, The Guilford Press: New York. 2006. 770 p.

34. Benjamini Y., & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1995. V. 57. P. 289–300.

35. Blackburn J., Mink J., Augustine E. Pediatric movement disorders. Neurol Clin Pract. 2012 Dec. V. 2 (4). P. 311–318.

36. Byrne B. M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. 2nd ed. (Multivariate applications series). New York: Taylor & Francis Group, 2010. 396. P. 73–84.

37. Dennis M., et al. Age, plasticity, and homeostasis in childhood brain disorders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2013. V. 37. P. 2760–2773.

38. Van Duijn G., et al. Vineland Screener 0–12 years research version (NL). Constructing a screening instrument to assess adaptive behavior. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2009. V. 18. № 2. P. 110–117. doi: 10.1002/mpr.282.

39. Dukette D., Stiles J. The effects of stimulus density of children’s analysis of hierarchical patterns. Developmental Science. 2001. V. 4. P. 233–251.

40. Engel de Abreu P., Conway A., Gathercole S. Working memory and fluid intelligence in young children. Intelligence. 2010. V. 38. № 6. P. 552–561.

41. Frankenburg W.K., Dobbs J. B. The Denver Developmental Screening Test. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1967. V. 71. № 2. P. 181–191. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(67)80070-2.

42. Frick A., Hansen M. A., Newcombe N. S. Development of mental rotation in 3- to 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development. 2013. V. 28. № 4. P. 386–399.

43. Frick A., Mohring W. Mental object rotation and motor development in 8- and 10-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2013. V. 115. P. 708–720.

44. Ghetti S., Bauer P. J. Origins and Development of Recollection: Perspectives from Psychology and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. 2012. P. 147.

45. Ghetti S., Angelini L. The development of recollection and familiarity in childhood and adolescence: evidence from the dual-process signal detection model. Child Development. 2008. V.79. № 2. P. 339–358, doi: 10.1111/j.1467–8624.2007.01129.x.

46. Glidden L. M. International Review of research in mental retardation / Ed. San Diego et al. Academic Press, 2001.

47. Glozman J. Developmental neuropsychology (Explorations in Developmental Psychology). The UK: Routledge, 2013.

48. Gregg M. Macmann; David W. Barnett. Some Additional Lessons from the Wechsler Scales: A Rejoinder to Kaufman and Keith. School Psychology Quarterly. 1994. V. 9. (3). P. 223–236.

49. Hayne H., Imuta K. Episodic memory in 3- and 4-yearold children. Developmental Psychobioljgy. 2011. V. 53. № 3. P. 17–22, doi: 10.1002/dev.20527.

50. Keith T. Z., & Witta E. L. Hierarchical and cross-age confirmatory factor analysis of the WISC–III: What does it measure? School Psychology Quarterly. 1997. V. 12 (2). P. 89–107.

51. Lauer J. E., Lourenco S. F. Spatial Processing in Infancy Predicts Both Spatial and Mathematical Aptitude in Childhood. Psychological Science. 2016. V. 27. № 10. P. 1291–1298.

52. Miroshnikov S.A, Nasledov A. D., Zashchirinskaia O. V. Criterion validation of the Scale of Psychomotor Development (SPMD) in developmental delay study of preschool children. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016. V. 233. P. 220–224.

53. Reise, S. P. The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2012. V. 47. P. 667–696.

54. Riou E., et al. Global developmental delay and its relationship to cognitive skills. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2009. V. 51. P. 600–606.

55. Tervo R. Red flags and rules of thumb: sorting out developmental delay. A pediatric perspective. 2009. V. 18. № 2.

56. Watkins M. W., & Beaujean A. A. Bifactor structure of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – Fourth Edition. School Psychology Quarterly. 2014. № 29 (1). P. 52–63.

57. Wellman H. M., Lopez-Duran S., LaBounty J., Hamilton B. Infant attention to intentional action predicts preschool theory of mind. Developmental Psychology. 2008. V. 44. P. 618–623.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up