Quantitative Analysis of the Publications of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the Scientific Direction of Psychology of Morality in 2002–2021. Part I. Bibliometric Analysis

Zhuravlev, A. L.; Kostrigin, A.

doi:10.31857/S020595920026158-9

Home

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Issue 3

Quantitative Analysis of the Publications of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the Scientific Direction of Psychology of Morality in 2002–2021. Part I. Bibliometric Analysis

Annotation
Reviews
References

Quantitative Analysis of the Publications of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the Scientific Direction of Psychology of Morality in 2002–2021. Part I. Bibliometric Analysis

PII

S020595920026158-9-1

DOI

10.31857/S020595920026158-9

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

A. L. Zhuravlev

Occupation: Professor, Scientific Adviser of Institute of Psychology RAS
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, building 1

A. Kostrigin

Occupation: Research Associate, Laboratory of History of Psychology and Historical Psychology
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, building 1

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 44 Issue 3

Pages

71-82

Abstract

In the article the authors turn to the study of the development of the scientific field of psychology of morality at the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2002–2021. The Institute's publications on the psychology of morality (monographs and collections of scientific works, a total of 20 books) were used as research material. It describes the corpus of the analyzed publications, bibliometric indicators that determine the characteristics of the formation of a scientific direction in a research center. The first part of the article considers the indicators of the dynamics of the number and volume of publications, frequency of authors, frequency of word combinations, and keywords. It is determined that the scientific direction of psychology of morality was actively developed at the Institute of Psychology (especially in 2007–2011 and 2012–2016), the merged research community was narrow and consisted mainly of employees of the Institute. The substantive characteristics of moral-psychological research were an appeal to the moral aspects of economic activity, moral problems and the state of modern Russian society, spiritual and moral education and personal development. A conclusion is made about the main trajectory of development of the direction of moral psychology at the Institute of Psychology.

Keywords

history of psychology, psychology of morality, psychology of spirituality, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences, scientific direction, research center, bibliometric analysis

Acknowledgment

The research was carried out according to the state assignments № 0138-2023-0001.

Publication date

28.06.2023

Number of characters

35403

Cite

GOST	Zhuravlev A., Kostrigin A. Quantitative Analysis of the Publications of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the Scientific Direction of Psychology of Morality in 2002–2021. Part I. Bibliometric Analysis // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2023. – V. 44. – Issue 3 C. 71-82 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920026158-9-1 (circulation date: 29.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920026158-9
MLA	Zhuravlev, A. L, Kostrigin, A. "Quantitative Analysis of the Publications of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the Scientific Direction of Psychology of Morality in 2002–2021. Part I. Bibliometric Analysis." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 44.3 (2023):71-82. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920026158-9
APA	Zhuravlev A., Kostrigin A. (2023). Quantitative Analysis of the Publications of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the Scientific Direction of Psychology of Morality in 2002–2021. Part I. Bibliometric Analysis. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 44(3), pp.71-82 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920026158-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 131

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Antsupov A.Ya., Kandybovich S.L., Timchenko G.N. Problemy otechestvennoi psikhologii. Ukazatel' 1410 doktorskikh dissertatsii (1935–2019 gg.). Moscow: Prospekt, 2020. (In Russian)

2. Brazhnikova A.N. Psikhologiya nravstvennosti: istoriya i sovremennost'. Moscow: MIU, 2018. (In Russian)

3. Volovikova M.I., Zhuravlev A.L. Vmesto vvedeniya: vklad Instituta psikhologii RAN v issledovanie dukhovno-nravstvennykh problem lichnosti i obshchestva. Dukhovno-nravstvennye problemy sovremennoi lichnosti. Eds. M.I. Volovikova, A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2018. P. 15–31. (In Russian)

4. Gostev A.A., Borisova N.V. Psikhologicheskie idei v tvorcheskom nasledii I.A. Il'ina: na putyakh sozdaniya psikhologii dukhovno-nravstvennoi sfery chelovecheskogo bytiya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2012. (In Russian)

5. Eliseeva I.N., Oleinik Yu.N. Naukometricheskii analiz kak metod izucheniya sostoyaniya i dinamiki nauchnogo napravleniya (na primere ispol'zovaniya kategorii “individual'nost'” v nazvaniyakh dissertatsionnykh issledovanii 1992–2018 gg.). Metodologiya, teoriya, istoriya psikhologii lichnosti. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Nikitina, N.E. Kharlamenkova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2019. P. 218–233. (In Russian)

6. Zhuravlev A.L., Yurevich A.V. Psikhologiya nravstvennosti kak oblast' psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2013. V. 34. № 3. P. 4–14. (In Russian)

7. Zuev K.B. Naukometricheskii analiz tvorcheskogo naslediya B.F. Lomova. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya v internet-prostranstve: poiskovye sistemy, sotsial'nye seti, elektronnye bazy. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, D.A. Kitova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2020. P. 340–362. (In Russian)

8. Kol'tsova V.A. Istoriya psikhologii. Problemy metodologii. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2008. (In Russian)

9. Kostrigin A.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Kolichestvennyi analiz izdanii Instituta psikhologii RAN po nauchnomu napravleniyu metodologii psikhologii v 2002–2021 gg. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2022. V. 43. № 5. P. 99–120. (In Russian)

10. Mazilov V.A. Aktual'nye metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoi otechestvennoi istorii psikhologii. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik. 2014. V. 2. № 2. P. 202–210. (In Russian)

11. Mironenko I.A. Problemy nravstvennosti. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina. 2010. V. 5. № 4. P. 62–75. (In Russian)

12. Moiseeva V.S. Dukhovno-nravstvennoe razvitie lichnosti v istorii psikhologicheskoi nauki: diss. ... kand. psikhol. nauk: 19.00.01. Stavropol', 2011. (In Russian)

13. Morgun A.N., Oleinik Yu.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Tematicheskie napravleniya otechestvennoi istorii psikhologii kak vnutrennie faktory razvitiya otrasli: naukometricheskii analiz na materiale RINTs. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial'naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya. 2021. V. 6. № 1 (21). P. 219–251. (In Russian)

14. Sarybekov M.N., Sydyknazarov M.K. Slovar' nauki. Obshchenauchnye terminy i opredeleniya, naukovedcheskie ponyatiya i kategorii. Almaty: Triumf “T”, 2008. (In Russian)

15. Semenov I.N. Obzor napravlenii rossiiskoi psikhologii tvorchestva i odarennosti. Psikhologiya. Istoriko-kriticheskie obzory i sovremennye issledovaniya. 2017. V. 6. № 6A. P. 3–22. (In Russian)

16. Shafikova G.R., Bondarenko G.V. Istoriya psikhologii nravstvennosti: religiozno-filosofskie aspekty (ot drevnosti do sovremennoi psikhologii). Ufa, 2007. (In Russian)

17. Yasin M.I. Sovremennye napravleniya issledovanii v psikhologii religii. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika. 2016. T. 22. № 2. S. 76–79. (In Russian)

18. Kilgarriff A. Simple maths for keywords. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2009). Eds. M. Mahlberg, V. González-Díaz, C. Smith. Liverpool, 2009. P. 171.