Attachment Styles in Close Relationships and Their Impact on Attitudes Toward Appearance

Occupation: Professor of the Department of Social Psychology
Affiliation: Academy of Psychology and Pedagogy of Southern Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 44 Issue 3

Pages

26-35

Abstract

The solution to the problem of “appearance (AP) — close, romantic relationships” is carried out, traditionally, in connection with the study of the physical component of AP. On the periphery of attention of researchers remains the consideration of a set of characteristics of the attitude to holistic AP. The aim was to determine the levels of severity of the various characteristics of attitudes to AP and to create a hierarchy of significance of differences depending on the levels of severity of anxiety and avoidance strategies in close relationships. The study involved 136 young people aged 18 to 30 years (Me=23; Mo=23; M=22.75; SD=2.60), 71% women, 28.6% men. Research methods: questionnaire “Experience of close relationships” in the adaptation of T.V. Kazantseva. Scalea “Self-assessment of the generalized type of attachment” (“RQ”) in the adaptation of T.V. Kazantseva; Scales: 1) “significance of AP in romantic relationships”; 2) “assessment of the dependence of the relationship with the romantic partner on the VP”; 3) “assessment of the experiences (awkwardness, stiffness, embarrassment) arising as a result of the presentation of the VP to the romantic partner”; 4) “self-assessment of the attractiveness of the VP for the partner of the opposite sex”. Mathematical procedures: rank transformation of the above variables (levels: low, medium; high); descriptive statistics; Criteria: H Kraskala–Wallis, U Mann–Whitney; Spearman correlation (IBM SPPS Statistic 23.0). Results: the severity of anxiety and avoidance strategies differentiate the levels of severity of various characteristics of the attitude to AP: a high level of anxiety strategy causes a high level of AP significance (U=532.500; p=0.025), high rating of the dependence of a relationship with a romantic partner from AP (U=564.000; p=0.046); a high level of severity of the avoidance strategy leads to a high level of severity of experiences that arise in the situation of presenting one's AP to a romantic partner (U=862.000; p=0.009), reduces the level of self-esteem of the attractiveness of AP for a partner of the opposite sex (U=947.000; p=0.043). Results are important in the development of practice-oriented programs aimed at solving problems in close relationships and reducing their dependence on the attitude to AP.

Keywords

appearance, characteristics of attitude to appearance, anxious strategy, strategic avoidance, levels of severity, hierarchy of differences, young people

Acknowledgment

Study was supported by Russian Science Foundation (project №22-28-0164).

Publication date

28.06.2023

Number of characters

22265

Cite

GOST	Labunskaya V. Attachment Styles in Close Relationships and Their Impact on Attitudes Toward Appearance // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2023. – V. 44. – Issue 3 C. 26-35 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920026154-5-1 (circulation date: 20.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920026154-5
MLA	Labunskaya, V. A. "Attachment Styles in Close Relationships and Their Impact on Attitudes Toward Appearance." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 44.3 (2023):26-35. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920026154-5
APA	Labunskaya V. (2023). Attachment Styles in Close Relationships and Their Impact on Attitudes Toward Appearance. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 44(3), pp.26-35 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920026154-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 154

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avdeeva N.N. Teorija privjazannosti: sovremennye issledovanija i perspektivy. Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija. 2017. V. 6. № 2. P. 7–14. (In Russian)

2. Barysheva N.A., Ozhigova L.N. Lichnostnye determinanty udovletvorennosti telom u devushek. Juzhno-rossijskij zhurnal social'nyh nauk. 2021. V. 22. № 2. P. 143–158. (In Russian)

3. Garvard O.O., Sabel'nikova N.V. Privjazannost' k romanticheskomu partneru junoshej i devushek s raznymi osobennostjami vzaimootnoshenij s roditeljami. Vestnik psihologii i pedagogiki Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. № 1. P. 27–35. (In Russian)

4. Drozdova I.I., Serikov G.V. Predstavlenija o roditel'skih ocenkah vneshnego oblika v svjazi s obespokoennost'ju im u starsheklassnikov. Jeksperimental'naja psihologija. 2020. V. 13. № 4. P. 151–162. (In Russian)

5. Enikolopov S., et al. Autoagressija i psihologicheskie aspekty vosprijatija tela pri depressii. Psihologicheskie issledovanija. 2022. V. 15. № 81. (In Russian)

6. Erohina E.A., Filippova E.V. Obraz tela i otnoshenie k svoemu telu u podrostkov: semejnye i sociokul'turnye faktory vlijanija (po materialam zarubezhnyh issledovanij). Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija. 2019. V. 8. № 4. P. 57–68. (In Russian)

7. Kazanceva T.V. Adaptacija modificirovannoj metodiki “Opyt blizkih otnoshenij” K. Brennan i R.K. Frejli. Izvestija Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gercena, 2008. № 34 (74). Ch. 2: Pedagogika, psihologija, teorija i metodika obuchenija. P. 139–143. (In Russian)

8. Kazanceva T.V. Social'no-psihologicheskie determinanty mezhlichnostnoj privjazannosti: Avtoref. diss. … kand. psihol. nauk. Saint Petersburg, 2011. (In Russian)

9. Kleva V.N., Chernjavskaja V.S. Faktory samootnoshenija lic s raznym otnosheniem k fizicheskomu “Ja”. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Pedagogika. Psihologija. Sociokinetika. 2021. V. 27. № 2. P. 88–96. (In Russian)

10. Klejn K., Kostenko V. Samodeterminacija v romanticheskih otnoshenijah: adaptacii oprosnika i utochnenie konstrukta. Psihologicheskie issledovanija. 2021. V. 14. № 78. (In Russian)

11. Krjukova T.L., Ekimchik O.A., Opekina T.P. Psihologija sovladanija s trudnostjami v blizkih (mezhlichnostnyh) otnoshenijah. Kostroma: Kostromskoj gos. Universitet, 2019. 340 p. (In Russian)

12. Labunskaja V.A. Samoocenka, cennost', znachimost' vneshnego oblika v studencheskoj srede i udovletvorennost' zhizn'ju. Juzhno-rossijskij zhurnal social'nyh nauk. 2019. V. 20. № 4. P. 198–209. (In Russian)

13. Labunskaja V.A. Trendy izuchenija otnoshenija k vneshnemu obliku s pozicij prikladnoj social'noj psihologii. Social'naja psihologija i obshhestvo. 2021. V. 12. № 3. P. 128–150. (In Russian)

14. Labunskaja V.A. Ierarhija intensivnosti vozdejstvija genderno-vozrastnyh faktorov, samoocenok vneshnego oblika na sub#ektivnoe blagopoluchie. Institut psihologii RAN. Social'naja i jekonomicheskaja psihologija. 2022. V. 7. № 4 (28). P. 29–53. (In Russian)

15. Labunskaja V.A., Gura O.R. Cennostnye orientacii kak prediktory znachimosti privlekatel'nogo vneshnego oblika v druzheskih i romanticheskih otnoshenijah. Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2022. V. 19. № 3. P. 219–231. (In Russian)

16. Opekina T.P., Ekimchik O.A. Romanticheskaja privjazannost' kak prediktor diadicheskogo kopinga v pare. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2022. V. 19. № 2. P. 223–240. (In Russian)

17. Os'minina A.A., Krjukova T.L. Faktory otnoshenija zhenshhin srednej vzroslosti k sobstvennomu vneshnemu obliku. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Pedagogika. Psihologija. Sociokinetika. 2020. V. 26. № 2. P. 56–62. (In Russian)

18. Sabel'nikova N.V., Kashirskij D.V. Oprosnik privjazannosti k blizkim ljudjam. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2015. V. 36. № 4. P. 84–97. (In Russian)

19. Social'naja psihologija vneshnego oblika: teoreticheskie podhody i jempiricheskie issledovanija. Kollektivnaja monografija. Eds. V.A. Labunskoj, G.V. Serikova, T.A. Shkurko. Rostov-na-Donu: Mini-Tajp, 2019. 456 p. (In Russian)

20. Uvarova M.I. Obraz tela u devushek iz polnyh i nepolnyh semej s raznymi tipami privjazannosti k materi. Molodoj uchenyj. 2022. № 44 (439). P. 314–315. (In Russian)

21. Chistopol'skaja K.A., Enikolopov S.N., Drovosekov S.Je. Vzroslaja romanticheskaja privjazannost' u molodyh ljudej v povsednevnosti i pri suicidal'nyh perezhivanijah. Suicidologija. 2021. V. 12. № 1. P. 109–125. (In Russian)

22. Chistopol'skaja K.A., et al. Adaptacija kratkoj versii “Pererabotannogo oprosnika – Opyt blizkih otnoshenij” (ECR-R) na russkojazychnoj vyborke. Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. № 5. P. 87–98. (In Russian)

23. Shkurko T.A. Prediktory i korreljaty jemocional'nogo otnoshenija k svoemu vneshnemu obliku i vneshnemu obliku partnera u suprugov, sostojashhih v zaregistrirovannom i nezaregistrirovannom brake. Juzhno-Rossijskij zhurnal social'nyh nauk. 2019. V. 20. № 3. P. 167–186. (In Russian)

24. Shnakkenberg N. Mnimye tela, podlinnye sushhnosti: Preodolenie konfliktov identichnosti s vneshnost'ju i vozvrashhenie k podlinnomu Ja. Per. s angl. 3-e izd. Kaliningrad: Phoca Books. 2019. (In Russian)

25. Borawski D, Nowak A. As long as you are self-compassionate, you will never walk alone. The interplay between self-compassion and rejection sensitivity in predicting loneliness. Journal of Psychology. 2022. V. 57. № 5. R. 621–628.

26. Brophy K., et al. The role of self-compassion in the relationship between attachment, depression, and quality of life. Journal of Affect Disorder. 2020. V. 260. Jan 1. R. 45–52.

27. Chi X., et al. Relationship between adverse childhood experiences and anxiety symptoms among Chinese adolescents: The role of self-compassion and social support. Current Psychology. 2022. Jan 8. P. 1–13.

28. Cortés-García L., Takkouche B., Rodriguez-Cano R., Senra C. Mediational mechanisms involved in the relation between attachment insecurity and depression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affect Disorder. 2020. V. 277. Dec 1. R. 706–726.

29. Davis A.C., Arnocky S. An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior. Archives of sexual behavior. 2022. Jan:51(1). R. 3–37.

30. Eastwick P.W., Luchies L.B., Finkel E J., Hunt L.L. The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2014. V. 140. № 3. R. 623–665.

31. Fornaini E., et al. The Power of Words: Appearance Comments from One's Partner Can Affect Men's Body Image and Women's Couple Relationship. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021. V. 18. № 17. Article 9319.

32. Frederick D.A., Reynolds T.A. The value of integrating evolutionary and sociocultural perspectives on body image. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2022. V. 51. № 1. R. 57–66.

33. Laus M.F., Sebastião S., Almeida S.S., Klos L.A. Body image and the role of romantic relationships. Cogent Psychology. 2018. V. 5. № 1. Article 1496986.

34. Murray C.V., Jacobs J.I., Rock A.J., Clark G.I. Attachment style, thought suppression, self-compassion and depression: Testing a serial mediation model. PLOS One. 2021. Jan. 14. e0245056.

35. Pritchard M., Brasil K., McDermott R., Holdiman A. Untangling the associations between generalized anxiety and body dissatisfaction: The mediating effects of social physique anxiety among collegiate men and women. Body Image. 2021. Dec. 39. R. 266–275.

36. Raque-Bogdan T.L., et al. Attachment and mental and physical health: self-compassion and mattering as mediators. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2011. Apr. V. 58. № 2. R. 272–278.

37. Raque-Bogdan T.L., et al. Self-compassion as a mediator between attachment anxiety and body appreciation: An exploratory model. Body Image. 2016. Dec.19. P. 28–36.

38. Swami V., Barron D., Furnham A. Appearance Orientation and Dating Anxiety in Emerging Adults: Considering the Roles of Appearance-Based Rejection Sensitivity, Social Physique Anxiety, and Self-Compassion. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2022. V. 51. R. 3981–3992.

39. Swami V., Robinson C., Furnham A. Associations between body image, social physique anxiety, and dating anxiety in heterosexual emerging adults. Body Image. 2021. Dec.39. R. 305–312.

40. Weller Ja.E., Dziegielewski S.F. The Relationship Between Romantic Partner Support Styles and Body Image Disturbance. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2005. V. 10. № 2. P. 71–92.