B.F. Lomov in Modern Interdisciplinary Research

Publication type Article
Status Published
Occupation: Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 44 Issue 1

A number of examples of the development of B.F. Lomov’ ideas in research related to the most popular areas of psychological science and practice are presented. It is shown that many of the ideas are in the general trend of modern works. In particular, the integrative approach, built on the systems idea provides answers to many questions of the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods, which are now being discussed intensively in connection with the practical problems of organizing interdisciplinary research. Meanwhile, the development of the idea of system integration of different approaches and methods ensured the creation of a toolkit developed in detail and tested in many academic and applied research. The cognitive-communicative approach, the impetus for the development of which was the ideas of B.F. Lomov on the relationship between cognition and communication, found its embodiment in the development of the problem of joint activity and formed the basis for the implementation of numerous projects related, in particular, to the management of big technical systems and the procuring of scientific and organizational activities, including the creation of new information and communication technologies. The activity design paradigm continues to be in demand for the problems of interaction between man and modern technology and for solving issues of mismatch between the goals of developing new technologies and their use. Particularly relevant are the claims of the anthropocentric approach that any technology, including artificial intelligence, is a means of achieving the goals set by man. Modern research carried out in the activity design paradigm confirms the fruitfulness of this paradigm for progress in the field of creating promising technologies. These studies received a new perspective of their development in connection with the tasks of preserving and transferring cognitive experience in solving the problems of capitalization of knowledge and the preservation of human capital. By analogy with “activity design”, these tasks are interpreted as “designing the perceived quality” of experience.

Keywordsperception, sound, communication, comparison, free verbalizations, perceived quality, verbal portrait, perceptual reconstruction
AcknowledgmentThe research was supported by the State assignment, project No. 0138-2022-0007 “Personal and communicative determinants of cognitive processes”. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.
Publication date26.02.2023
Number of characters39091
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 250

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Anan'eva K.I., Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S., Haritonov A.N. Kognitivno-kommunikativnaja paradigma B.F. Lomova: sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2017. V. 38. №6. P. 17–29.

2. Bogdanova I.V., Nosulenko V.N. Sovremennye tendencii primenenija smeshannyh metodov v psihologicheskih issledovanijah. Poznanie i perezhivanie. 2021. V. 2. № 3. P. 6–20.

3. Zhuravlev A.L. Psihologija sovmestnoj dejatel'nosti. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2005.

4. Zhuravlev A.L. Kollektivnyj sub#ekt: osnovnye priznaki, urovni i psihologicheskie tipy. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2009. V. 30. № 5. P. 72–80.

5. Zavalova N.D., Lomov B.F., Ponomarenko V.A. Obraz v sisteme psihicheskoj reguljacii dejatel'nosti. Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

6. Kutahov V.P. Problemy i napravlenija intellektualizacii upravlenija krupnomasshtabnymi aviacionnymi sistemami. XIV Vserossijskaja mul'tikonferencija po problemam upravlenija (MKPU-2021): materialy XIV mul'tikonferencii (Divnomorskoe, Gelendzhik, 27 sentjabrja – 2 oktjabrja 2021 g.): in 4 V. Rostov-na-Donu; Taganrog: Izdatel'stvo Juzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta, 2021. V. 3. P. 52–54.

7. Lazurskij A.F. Ob estestvennom jeksperimente. Trudy pervogo vserossijskogo s#ezda po jeksperimental'noj psihologii. Saint Petersburg: Izdanie bjuro s#ezda. 1911.

8. Lalu S., Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. Sredstva obshhenija v kontekste individual'noj i sovmestnoj dejatel'nosti. Obshhenie i poznanie. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2007. P. 407–434.

9. Lomov B.F. O putjah postroenija teorii inzhenernoj psihologii na osnove sistemnogo podhoda. Inzhenernaja psihologija. Eds. B.F. Lomov, V.F. Rubahin, V.F. Vendy. Moscow: Nauka, 1977.

10. Lomov B.F. Osobennosti poznavatel'nyh processov v uslovijah obshhenija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1980. V. 1. № 5. P. 26–42.

11. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psihologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1984.

12. Lomov B.F. Nauchno-tehnicheskij progress i sredstva umstvennogo razvitija cheloveka. Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 1985. V. 6. № 6. P. 8–28.

13. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psihologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1999.

14. Lomov B.F., Beljaeva A.V., Nosulenko V.N. Verbal'noe kodirovanie v poznavatel'nyh processah. Analiz priznakov sluhovogo obraza. Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

15. Nosulenko V.N. Psihofizika slozhnogo signala: problemy i perspektivy. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1985. V. 6. № 2. P. 73–84.

16. Nosulenko V.N. Psihofizika vosprijatija estestvennoj sredy. Problema vosprinimaemogo kachestva. Moscow: IP RAN, 2007.

17. Nosulenko V.N. Opyt ispol'zovanija informacionno‑kommunikacionnyh tehnologij v provedenii nauchno‑organizacionnyh soveshhanij. Poznanie i perezhivanie. 2020. V. 1. № 1. P. 135–148.

18. Nosulenko V.N. Voprosy integracii kachestvennyh i kolichestvennyh metodov v psihologicheskom issledovanii. Jeksperimental'naja psihologija. 2021. V. 14. № 3. P. 4–16.

19. Nosulenko V.N. Kognitivno-kommunikativnaja paradigma B. F. Lomova v izuchenii sovmestnoj dejatel'nosti po upravleniju kosmicheskim poletom. Aktual'nye problemy psihologii truda, inzhenernoj psihologii i jergonomiki. Eds. A.A. Oboznov, A.L. Zhuravleva, Ju.V. Bessonova. Moscoow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”. 2021. № 10. P. 155–169.

20. Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. “Poznanie i obshhenie”: sistemnaja issledovatel'skaja paradigma. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2012. V. 33. № 4. P. 5–16.

21. Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. Issledovanie organizacionno-intellektual'noj dejatel'nosti. Public Administration. 2017. № 3–4. P. 255–264.

22. Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. Raspoznavanie slozhnyh zvukov po ih verbal'nym portretam. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2020. V. 41. № 5. P. 25–37.

23. Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. Kognitivnyj opyt v sostave chelovecheskogo kapitala. Sistemnye issledovanija. Metodologicheskie problemy. Ezhegodnik 2021–2022. Eds. Ju.S. Popkov, V.I. Tishhenko i dr. Moscow: FIC IU RAN. 2022. № 40. P. 272–295.

24. Nosulenko V.N., Haritonov A.N. Zhizn' sredi zvukov. Psihologicheskie rekonstrukcii. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018.

25. Tehnologii sohranenija i vosproizvedenija kognitivnogo opyta. Ed. V.N. Nosulenko. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016.

26. Shherbinin I.P., Batajshhikov A.A. Osobennosti primenenija raspredelennyh decentralizovannyh sistem kontrolja i upravlenija v sovremennyh letatel'nyh apparatah. XIV Vserossijskaja mul'tikonferencija po problemam upravlenija (MKPU-2021): materialy XIV mul'tikonferencii (Divnomorskoe, Gelendzhik, 27 sentjabrja — 2 oktjabrja 2021 g.): in 4 V. Rostov-na-Donu; Taganrog: Izdatel'stvo Juzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta, 2021. V. 3. P. 60–64.

27. Abric J.‑C. Psychologie de la communication : théories et méthodes. Paris: Armand Colin, 1999. (In French)

28. Åkerblad L., Seppänen-Järvelä R., Haapakoski K. Integrative Strategies in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2021. V. 15. № 2. P. 152–170.

29. Borys B.-B. Evaluation of auditory displays supporting aircraft approach and landing. Automated Systems Based on Human Skill: Symposium – Joint Design of Technology and Organization 2003. Eds. J. Stahre, L. Mårtensson. Elsevier, 2004. P. 129–134.

30. Creswell J.W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA.– L.: Sage Publications, 2002.

31. Ehn P. Scandinavian Design: On Participation & Skill. Usability: Turning technologies into tools. Eds. P.S. Adler, T.A. Winograd. New York: Oxford University Press. 1992. P. 96–132.

32. Fetters M., Molina-Azorin J. The Journal of Mixed Methods Researchstarts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2017. V. 11. №. 3. P. 291–307.

33. Gourgand P. Les techniques de travail en groupe. Paris: Privat, 1989.

34. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Eds. A.M. Tashakkori, C.B. Teddlie. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2003.

35. Hasbrook A.H., Rasmussen P.G. Aural Glide Slope Cues: Their Effect on Pilot Performance during In-Flight Simulated ILS Instrument Approaches. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Medicine, Washington, D.C. 1971.

36. Hesse-Biber S. Mixed methods research: the “thingness” problem. Qualitative Health Research. 2015. V. 26. № 6. P. 775–788.

37. Lahlou S., Nosulenko V., Samoylenko E. Numériser le travail. Théories, méthodes, expérimentations. Paris: Lavoisier, 2012. (In French)

38. Le Bellu S., Lahlou S., Nosulenko V., Samoylenko E. Studying activity in manual work: A framework for analysis and training. Le Travail Humain. 2016. V. 79. № 1. P. 7–29.

39. Morgan D.L. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. A Pragmatic Approach. London: Sage Publications. 2013.

40. Morgan D.L. After Triangulation, What Next?. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Apr. 6, 2022, OnlineFirst.

41. Morse J.M., Niehaus L. Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, 2009.

42. Norman D.A., Draper S. (Eds.). User centered system design: New perspectives in Human Computer Interaction. Hillsdale; New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1986.

43. Nosulenko V. Communication in problems involving the evaluation of signals. Soviet Education, 1979. V. 21. № 3. P. 71–88.

44. Nosulenko V., Samoylenko E. Approche systémique de l’analyse des verbalisations dans le cadre de l’étude des processus perceptifs et cognitifs. Social Science Information. 1997. V. 36. № 2. P. 223–261. (In French)

45. Nosulenko V., Samoylenko E. Evaluation de la qualité perçue des produits et services: approche interdisciplinaire. International Journal of Design and Innovation Research, 2001, V. 2. № 2. P. 35–60. (In French)

46. Samoylenko E., McAdams S., Nosulenko V. Systematic analysis of verbalizations produced in comparing musical timbres. International Journal of Psychology, 1996. V. 31. № 6. P. 255–278.

47. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks; CA: Sage, 1998.

48. Tashakkori A., Johnson R.B., Teddlie C. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 2021.

49. Titscher S., Meyer M., Wodak R., Vetter E. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 2000.

50. Thomas D.R. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation. 2006. V. 12. № 2. P. 237–246.

51. Uprichard E., Dawney L. Data diffraction: Challenging data integration in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2019. V. 13. № 1. P. 19–32.

52. Waller M.R., Nepomnyaschy L., Miller D.P., Mingo M. Using a narrative approach to analyze longitudinal mixed methods data. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2021. V. 15. № 2. P. 261–283.

53. Willig C. Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. Adventures in Theory and Method. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001.

Система Orphus