All
 
|
 
 


Modification of Psychotherapeutic Discourse in the Conditions of Online Consulting
 
PIIS020595920023644-4-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920023644-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Anatoly Voronin 
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
O. V. Chvilyova
Affiliation: Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Managementl” of Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
I. V. Smirnov
Affiliation: Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Managementl” of Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
M. A. Stankevich
Occupation: Research Engineer
Affiliation: 2Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Managementl” of Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 43 Issue 6
Pages51-65
Abstract

Remote counseling has become widespread in recent years among broad online communication and is associated with conflicts due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, language characteristics and features of speech experience during online consultations were not participants in group studies. This work is dedicated to the Royal version of psychotherapeutic discourse in the collection of remote technologies. To achieve the goals set for preliminary research, using the analysis of public interview data, it was revealed that online counseling is indirectly perceived indirectly as an impact and tense, sensitive as a stressor, and changes in discourse are affected as spontaneous coping strategies: different for a psychotherapist. and client verbal and behavioral coping matters. The main research was devoted to the analysis of semantic-syntactic statistics of statements using the method of relational-situational analysis (RSA). During the study, 4 texts of 50 texts in a corpus were collected: replicas of psychotherapists and clients during face-to-face and online counseling. Comparison of therapists' replies, face-to-face and online, showed that there were significant differences in 49 identified features of RSA. When checking customers – 52 indicators. In order to generalize the income increase method, a factorial comparison of the data pooling structure [the pooled data method] was carried out. The resulting factor solutions were interpreted as combined characteristics of psychotherapeutic discourse. For the statements of psychotherapists, 6 such characteristics were identified, for clients – 5. The given changes in the psychotherapeutic discourse are the speech components of a spontaneous coping strategy to overcome the more acute and uncertain online consultation, and its consequences.

Keywordsdiscourse, online consulting, free interview, semantic-syntactic structure of the text, relational-situational analysis
Publication date22.12.2022
Number of characters36928
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 274

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Ahmerova L.R. Sposoby verbalizacii dushevnogo sostojanija v psihoterapevticheskom diskurse. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Serija Gumanitarnye nauki. 2010. V. 152. № 6. P. 180–187. (In Russian)
2. Busygina N.P. Sovremennye podhody k analizu diskursa, razgovora i povestvovanija, i ih znachenie dlja issledovanij v oblasti psihoterapii. Psihologija v vuze. 2014. № 4. P. 43–59. (In Russian)
3. Enikolopov S.N., Kuznecova Ju.M., Smirnov I.V., Stankevich M.A., Chudova N.V. Sozdanie instrumenta avtomaticheskogo analiza teksta v interesah socio-gumanitarnyh issledovanij. Chast' 1. Metodicheskie i metodologicheskie aspekty. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i prinjatie reshenij. 2019. № 2. P. 28–38. (In Russian)
4. Kalina N.F. Analiz diskursa v psihoterapii. Zhurnal prakticheskoj psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2002. №3. (In Russian)
5. Karaulov Ju.N. Russkij jazyk i jazykovaja lichnost'. 1-e izd. Moscow: Nauka, 1987. 264 p. (In Russian)
6. Kasavin I.T. Diskurs-analiz i ego primenenie v psihologii. Voprosy psihologii. 2007. № 6. P. 97–119. (In Russian)
7. Kvale S. Issledovatel'skoe interv'ju. Moscow: Smysl, 2003. 301 p. (In Russian)
8. Kirillova E.I., Orlov A.B. Intent-analiz psihoterapevticheskoj rechi K. Rodzhersa (sluchai Gerberta, Glorii i Dzhen). Konsul'tativnaja psihologija i psihoterapija. 2010. V. 18. № 4. P. 134–165. (In Russian)
9. Korotkova V.O. Polozhitel'nye i otricatel'nye storony distancionnogo psihologicheskogo konsul'tirovanija. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija: aktual'nye voprosy, dostizhenija i innovacii: sbornik statej IV Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. V 2 ch. Ch.1. Penza: MCNS “Nauka i Prosveshhenie”. 2018. P. 185–187. (In Russian)
10. Osipov G.S., Smirnov I.V., Tihomirov I.A. Reljacionno-situacionnyj metod poiska i analiza tekstov i ego prilozhenija. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i prinjatie reshenij. 2008. № 2. P. 3–10. (In Russian)
11. Pavlova N.D. Kommunikativnaja paradigma v psihologii rechi i psiholingvistike. Psihologicheskie issledovanija diskursa. Moscow: Persje, 2002. P. 8–43. (In Russian)
12. Smirnov I.V., Shelmanov A.O., Kuznecova E.S., Hramoin I.V. Semantiko-sintaksicheskij analiz estestvennyh jazykov. Chast' II. Metod semantiko-sintaksicheskogo analiza tekstov. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i prinjatie reshenij. 2014. № 1 P. 11–24. (In Russian)
13. Sternin I. A.  Osnovy rechevogo vozdejstvija. Voronezh: Istoki, 2012.  178 p. (In Russian)
14. Sumina N.V. Semanticheskie i pragmaticheskie harakteristiki psihoterapevticheskogo diskursa: Diss. ... kand. filol. nauk. Nal'chik, 2016. (In Russian)
15. Fominichev A.V. Psihoterapevticheskij diskurs: issledovanie osobennostej rechevogo vzaimodejstvija geshtal't-terapevta. Severo-Kavkazskij psihologicheskij vestnik. 2012. V. 10. №3. P. 53–56. (In Russian)
16. Alleman J.R. Online counseling: The Internet and mental health treatment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2002. V. 39. №. 2. P. 199–209.
17. Barak A. Psychological applications on the Internet: A discipline on the threshold of a new millennium. Applied and Preventive Psychology. 1999. V. 8. №. 4. P. 231–245.
18. Barak A., Hen L., Boniel-Nissim M., Shapira, N. A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human services. 2008. V. 26. №. 2–4. P. 109–160.
19. Carlbring P. et al. Treatment of social phobia: randomised trial of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy with telephone support. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2007. V. 190. №. 2. P. 123–128.
20. Dowling M., Rickwood D. Online counseling and therapy for mental health problems: A systematic review of individual synchronous interventions using chat. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2013. V. 31. №. 1. P. 1–21.
21. Giorgi A., Giorgi V. Phenomenological psychology. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. Eds. C. Wilig, W. Stainton-Rogers. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2008. P. 165–178.
22. Griffiths M. Online therapy for addictive behaviors. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 2005. V. 8. №. 6. P. 555–561.
23. Hanley T. Developing youth-friendly online counseling services in the UK: A small scale investigation into the views of practitioners. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research. 2006. V. 6. №. 3. P. 116–119.
24. Holmes C., Foster V. A preliminary comparison study of online and face-to-face counseling: Client perceptions of three factors. Journal of technology in human services. 2012. V. 30. №. 1. P. 14–31.
25. Hopps S.L., Pépin M., Boisvert J.M. The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral group therapy for loneliness via inter relaychat among people with physical disabilities. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2003. V. 40. №. 1–2. P. 136–147.
26. Humer E. et al. Psychotherapy via the Internet: What programs do psychotherapists use, how well-informed do they feel, and what are their wishes for continuous education? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. V. 17. №. 21.
27. King R. et al. Online counselling: The motives and experiences of young people who choose the Internet instead of face to face or telephone counselling. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2006. V. 6. №. 3. P. 169–174.
28. Kraus R., Stricker G., Speyer C. Online counseling: A handbook for mental health professionals. London: Academic Press, 2010.
29. Manhal-Baugus M. E-therapy: Practical, ethical, and legal issues. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2001. V. 4. №. 5. P. 551–563.
30. Mohr D.C. et al. The effect of telephone-administered psychotherapy on symptoms of depression and attrition: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2008. V. 15. №. 3. P. 243–253.
31. Richards D., Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review. 2012. V. 32. №. 4. P. 329–342.
32. Richards D., Viganò N. Online Counseling Source. Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior. Ed. Z. Yan. Hershey: IGI Global, 2012. P. 699-713.
33. Satalkar P., Shrivastava S., Desousa A. Internet-mediated psychotherapy: Are we ready for the ethical challenges? Indian journal of medical ethics. 2015. V. 12. №. 4. P. 220–227.
34. Skinner A., Latchford G. Attitudes to counselling via the Internet: A comparison between in-person counselling clients and Internet support group users. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2006. V. 6. №. 3. P. 158–163.
35. Stoll J., Müller J.A., Trachsel M. Ethical issues in online psychotherapy: A narrative review. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2020. V. 10. P. 993.
36. Stommel W., Van der Houwen F. Complaining and the management of face in online counseling. Qualitative Health Research. 2014. V. 24. №. 2. P. 183–193.
37. Strecher V.J., Shiffman S., West R. Randomized controlled trial of a web‐based computer‐tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction. 2005. V. 100. №. 5. P. 682–688.
38. Ström L., Pettersson R., Andersson G. Internet-based treatment for insomnia: a controlled evaluation. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 2004. V. 72. №. 1. P. 113–121.
39. Wagner B., Horn A. B., Maercker A. Internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive-behavioral intervention for depression: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Journal of affective disorders. 2014. V. 152. P. 113–121.
40. Young K.S. An empirical examination of client attitudes towards online counseling. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2005. V. 8. №. 2. P. 172–177.
41. Zainudin Z.N., Yusop Y.M. Cyber-counseling: Is it really new. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences. 2018. V. 2. №. 2. P. 19–24.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up