Theoretical and methodological foundations for psychological impact models

Psychological impact is an integral part of social life. The purpose of this work was to reveal theoretical and methodological bases of existing and possible promising models of psychological impact. The analysis revealed that the developed models of psychological impact typically describe a process of changing only one of the realities of human existence (experiential, socio-cultural or existential), as they predominantly rely on types of activity regulation associated with a particular reality. The corresponding reality, in turn, determines the type of determination of psychological effects within the model. The paper presents the images of the individual that underlie the impact models that rely on each of the types of human activity regulation. It is shown that different types of regulation form an integral multidimensional regulation of human activity in the world, demonstrating not only the possibility of simultaneous coexistence, but also mutual influence. The necessity of taking into account the multidimensional regulation of human activity in models of psychological impact, describing all three realities of being, using the multidimensional, complex image of the man, has been pointed out.

Keywords

psychological impact, regulation of activity, motivation, determination, reality of human existence

Received

09.02.2021

Publication date

11.05.2022

Number of characters

30522

Cite

GOST	Nikolaev D. Theoretical and methodological foundations for psychological impact models // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2022. – V. 43. – Issue 2 C. 51-60 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920019412-9-1 (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920019412-9
MLA	Nikolaev, D. E. "Theoretical and methodological foundations for psychological impact models." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 43.2 (2022):51-60. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920019412-9
APA	Nikolaev D. (2022). Theoretical and methodological foundations for psychological impact models. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 43(2), pp.51-60 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920019412-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 445

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Asmolov A.G. U poroga neklassicheskoj reljativistskoj psihologii. Sibirskij psihol. zhurn. 1998. Vyp. 7. P. 7–16. (In Russian)

2. Assadzholi R. Dinamicheskaja psihologija i psihosintez. Psihositez: teorija i praktika. Moscow: REFL-book, 1994. (In Russian)

3. Bern Je. Transaktnyj analiz v psihoterapii: Sistemnaja, individual'naja i social'naja psihiatrija. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt; Gaudeamus, 2015. (In Russian)

4. Vygotskij L.S. Sobranie sochinenij: V 6-ti t. V. 3: Problemy razvitija psihiki. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. (In Russian)

5. Docenko E.L. Psihologija manipuljacii: fenomeny, mehanizmy i zashhita. Moscow: CheRo, Izdatel'stvo MGU, 1997. (In Russian)

6. Zimbardo F., Ljajppe M. Social'noe vlijanie. St. Petersburg, 2000. (In Russian)

7. Znakov V.V. Psihologija vozmozhnogo: Novoe napravlenie issledovanij ponimanija. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2020. (In Russian)

8. Joumens T. Dvenadcat' klassicheskih uprazhnenij. Psihositez: teorija i praktika. Moscow: REFL-book, 1994. P. 153−187. (In Russian)

9. Kabachenko T. S. Metody psihologicheskogo vozdejstvija. Moscow, 2000. (In Russian)

10. Latynov V.V. Ponjatie “psihologicheskoe vozdejstvie”. Razrabotka ponjatij v sovremennoj psihologii. V 2 t. V. 2. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2019. (In Russian)

11. Lebedev A.N. Psihologija reklamnoj kommunikacii v izmenjajushhemsja obshhestve: Dis. … d-ra psihol. nauk. Moscow, 2004. (In Russian)

12. Leont'ev A.N. Izbrannye psihologicheskie proizvedenija. V 2 t. V. 2. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. (In Russian)

13. Leont'ev D.A. Psihologija smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoj real'nosti. 2-e, ispr. izd. Moscow: Smysl, 2003. (In Russian)

14. Leont'ev D.A. Opyt metodologicheskogo osmyslenija praktik raboty s lichnost'ju: fasilitacija, nootehnika, zhiznetvorchestvo. Konsul'tativnaja psihologija i psihoterapija. 2012. № 4. P. 164–185. (In Russian)

15. Mejer V., Chesser Je. Metody povedencheskoj terapii. St. Petersburg: Rech', 2001. (In Russian)

16. Nikolaev D.E. Mehanizmy motivoobrazovanija: kul'turno-istoricheskij podhod. Psihologicheskie issledovanija. 2020. V. 13. № 71. P. 5. URL: http://psystudy.ru (In Russian)

17. Nikolaev D.E. Mul'tiparadigmal'nyj analiz teorij motivacii personala. Voprosy psihologii. 2020. V. 66. № 2. P. 29–41. (In Russian)

18. Perlz F. Teorija geshtal'tterapii. Moscow: Institut Obshhegumanitarnyh Issledovanij, 2004. (In Russian)

19. Petrovskij V.A. Chelovek nad situaciej. Moscow: Smysl, 2010. (In Russian)

20. Psihologicheskoe vozdejstvie v mezhlichnostnoj i massovoj kommunikacii. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev i N.D. Pavlova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2014. (In Russian)

21. Chaldini R. Psihologija soglasija: Revoljucionnaja metodika pre-ubezhdenija. Moscow: Jeksmo, 2019. (In Russian)

22. Chiksentmihaji M. Potok. Psihologija optimal'nogo perezhivanija. Moscow: Al'pina NonFikshn, 2020. (In Russian)

23. Asch S.E. Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press, 1951. Р. 177–190.

24. deCharms R. Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior. N.Y.: Academic Press, 1968.

25. Deci E., Olafsen A., Ryan R. Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2017. № 4. Р. 19–43.

26. Gagné M., Deci E. The History of Self-Determination Theory in Psychology and Management. The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2014. Р. 1 012.

27. González M.G., Niemiec C.P., Williams G.C. At the interface of work and health: A consideration of the health gradient using self-determination theory. The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2014. Р. 363–373.

28. Kelman H.C. Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1958. № 2 (1). Р. 51–60.

29. Olafsen A.H., Deci E.L., Halvari H. Basic psychological needs and work motivation: A longitudinal test of directionality. Motiv. Emot. 2018.№ 42. Р. 178–189.

30. Ross L., Nisbett R.E. The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1991.

31. Ryan R., Deci E. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist. 2020. Vol. 55. № 1. Р. 68–78.

32. Ryan R., Deci E. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. N.Y.: The Guilford Press, 2017.

33. Skinner B.F. Answers for My Critics. Beyond the Punitive Society: Operant Conditioning: Social and Poltical Aspects. San Francisco: Freeman, 1973. P. 256–266.

34. The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2014.