Institutional Factors in the Development of the Domestic History of Psychology: an Analysis of Evidence from the RSCI Database

Occupation: Associate professor, Department of Continuing Education Organization, Faculty of Continuing Professional Education
Affiliation: Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia
Address: 117997, Moscow, st. Ostrovityanova, 1, Russia

Yu. N. Оleynik

Occupation: Head of the Department of General, Social Psychology and the History of Psychology
Affiliation: Autonomous Nonprofit Organization of Higher Education “Moscow University for the Humanities”
Address: 111395, Moscow, st. Yunosti, 5, Russia

A. L. Zhuravlev

Occupation: Scientific Adviser
Affiliation: Federal State-Financed Establishment of Science, Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: 129366, Moscow, st. Yaroslavskaya, 13, building 1, Russia

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Pages

145-154

Abstract

The article discusses bibliometric and scientometric indicators of an array of publications on the history of psychology, indexed by the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI). The contribution of historical and psychological articles to formal indicators of the influence of scientific journals is shown. The organizations that make a significant contribution to the total number of historical and psychological publications are identified. The contribution of these organizations to formal indicators of the influence of the branch of the history of psychology as an array of publications indexed at the RSCI is also shown.

Keywords

history of psychology, H-index, impact factor, aggregate impact factor

Acknowledgment

The study is supported by the grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-013-00779. This article is a translation of: Morgun A.N., Оleynik Yu.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Institutional factors in the development of the domestic history of psychology (on the material of the RSCI). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. V. 42. № 1. P. 111–121. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920013341-1.

Received

13.03.2021

Publication date

13.03.2021

Number of characters

20307

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Morgun A., Оleynik Y., Zhuravlev A. Institutional Factors in the Development of the Domestic History of Psychology: an Analysis of Evidence from the RSCI Database // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2021. – V. 42. – Issue 1 C. 145-154 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920014202-8-1 (circulation date: 20.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920014202-8
MLA	Morgun, A. N, Оleynik, Yu. N, Zhuravlev, A. L "Institutional Factors in the Development of the Domestic History of Psychology: an Analysis of Evidence from the RSCI Database." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 42.1 (2021):145-154. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920014202-8
APA	Morgun A., Оleynik Y., Zhuravlev A. (2021). Institutional Factors in the Development of the Domestic History of Psychology: an Analysis of Evidence from the RSCI Database. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 42(1), pp.145-154 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920014202-8

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1030

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Eliseeva I.N., Olejnik Ju.N. Naukometricheskij analiz kak metod izuchenija sostojanija i dinamiki nauchnogo napravlenija (na primere ispol’zovanija kategorii “individual’nost’” v nazvanijah dissertacionnyh issledovanij 1992–2018 gg.) // Metodologija, teorija, istorija psihologii lichnosti / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Nikitina, N.E. Harlamenkova. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2019. S. 218–233 [Eliseeva I.N, Oleinik Yu.N. Scientometric Analysis as a Method for Studying the State and the Dynamics of an Academic Branch (on the material of using the category “individuality” in the names of dissertation research topics in 1992–2018) // Methodology, Theory, History of Personality Psychology / Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Nikitina, N.E. Kharlamenkov. M.: “Institute of Psychology of RAS”, 2019. P. 218–233.]

2. Zuev K.B., Nestik T.A. Bibliometricheskij analiz osnovnyh pokazatelej publikacij po teme “Psihologija” v naukometricheskoj baze Web of Science Core Collection // Fundamental’nye i prikladnye issledovanija sovremennoj psihologii / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Kol’cova. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2017. S. 1822–1829 [Zuev K.B., Nestik T.A. Bibliometric Analysis of the Main Indicators of Publications on the Topic “Psychology” in the Scientometric Database Web of Science Core Collection // Fundamental and Applied Research in Modern Psychology / Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Koltsov. M.: ”Institute of Psychology RAS”, 2017. P. 1822–1829]

3. Zuev K.B., Nestik T.A. Bibliometricheskij analiz razvitija osnovnyh napravlenij psihologicheskih issledovanij (po dannym WoS i statistike poiskovyh zaprosov Google) // Psihologicheskoe znanie: sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. S. 671–697 [Zuev K.B., Nestik T.A. Bibliometric Analysis of the Development of the Main Directions of Psychological Research (according to WoS data and statistics of Google search queries) // Psychological Knowledge: Current State and Development Prospects. M.: “Institute of Psychology RAS”, 2018. P. 671–697.]

4. Kolyshkina A.V., Olejnik Ju.N. Vozmozhnosti ispol’zovanija metoda indeksa citirovanija v istoriko-psihologicheskom issledovanii // Sovremennaja psihologija: sostojanie i perspektivy issledovanij. Ch. 4. Metodologicheskie problemy istoriko-psihologicheskogo issledovanija: materialy jubilejnoj nauchnoj konferencii IP RAN, 29–29 janvarja 2002 g. / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2002. S. 288–298 [Kolyshkina A.V., Oleinik Yu.N. Possibilities of Using the Citation Index Method in Historical and Psychological Research // Modern Psychology: State and Prospects of Research. Part 4. Methodological Problems of Historical and Psychological Research: Materials of the Jubilee Academic Conference of the IP RAS, January 29–29, 2002 / Ed. ed. A.L. Zhuravlev. M.: “Institute of Psychology RAS”, 2002. P. 288–298.]

5. Kostrigin A.A., Husjainov T.M. Imja L.S. Vygotskogo kak ob’ekt Digital Humanities // Istorija psihologii v licah: Dajdzhest. 2016. № 6. S. 44–66 [Kostrigin A.A., Khusyanov T.M. The name of L.S. Vygotsky as an Object of Digital Humanities // History of Psychology in Persons: Digest. 2016. № 6. P. 44–66.]

6. Kostrigin A.A., Husjainov T.M. Digital Humanities v istorii psihologii (na primere familii V.M. Behtereva) // Cifrovoj uchenyj: laboratorija filosofa. 2018. T. 1. № 1. S. 160–179 [Kostrigin A.A., Khusyanov T.M. Digital Humanities in the history of psychology (on the example of the name of V.M. Bekhterev) // Digital scientist: laboratory of a philosopher. 2018. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 160–179.]

7. Kostrigin A.A., Mazina K.N. Istoki i aktual’nost’ vozniknovenija kognitivnoj psihologii (Digital Humanities v istorii psihologii) // Istorija psihologii v licah: Dajdzhest. 2018. № 3. S. 19–30 [Kostrigin A.A., Mazina K.N. The Origins and Relevance of the Emergence of Cognitive Psychology (Digital Humanities in the history of psychology) // History of Psychology in Persons: Digest. 2018. № 3. P. 19–30.]

8. Kostrigin A.A., Nekrasova A.S., Demeshhuk Je.L. Cifrovaja istorija psihologii: ispol’zovanie ponjatija “bessoznatel’noe” v russkojazychnoj literature // Istorija psihologii v licah: Dajdzhest. 2018. № 3. S. 31–41 [Kostrigin A.A., Nekrasova A.S., Demeshuk E.L. The Digital History of Psychology: the Use of the Concept of “Unconscious” in Russian-language Literature // History of Psychology in Persons: Digest. 2018. № 3. P. 31–41.]

9. Mazilov V.A., Batyrshina A.R. Vozmozhnosti naukometricheskogo podhoda v istoriko-psihologicheskom issledovanii (na primere problemy voli v otechestvennoj psihologii) // Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik. 2016. № 36. S. 63–74 [Mazilov V.A., Batyrshina A.R. Possibilities of the Scientometric Approach in Historical and Psychological Research (with the Problem of will in the Russian Psychology as an Example) // Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2016. № 36. Р. 63–74.]

10. Morgun A.N. Naukometricheskoe prostranstvo issledovanij po istorii psihologii: prirosty i izderzhki // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2019. № 2. S. 136–146 [Morgun A.N. Scientometric Research Space in the History of Psychology: Increments and Costs // Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2019. № 2. P. 136–146.]

11. Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Analiz bol’shih dannyh v psihologii i sociogumanitarnyh naukah: perspektivnye napravlenija issledovanij // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2019. T. 40. № 6. S.5–17 [Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Analysis of Big Data in Psychology and Socio Humanities: Promising Research Areas // Psychological Journal. 2019. Vol. 40. № 6. P. 5–17.]

12. Pisljakov V.V. Bibliometricheskie indikatory v resursah Thomson Reuters // Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatory razvitija nauki i tehnologii / Pod.red. M.A. Akoeva. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural’skogo universiteta, 2014. S. 75–109 [Pislyakov V.V. Bibliometric Indicators in Thomson Reuters Resources // Guide to Scientometrics: Indicators of Science and Technology Development / Ed. M.A. Akoeva. Ekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Ural University, 2014. P. 75–109.]

13. Pisljakov V.V. Metody ocenki znanija po pokazateljam citirovanija // Sociologicheskij zhurnal. 2007. № 1. S. 128–140 [Pislyakov V.V. Methods for Assessing Knowledge by Citation Indicators // Sociological Journal. 2007. № 1. P. 128–140.]

14. Cherdakova M.M., Kostrigin A.A. Bibliometricheskij analiz publikacij v sbornikah materialov konferencij “Istorija otechestvennoj i mirovoj psihologicheskoj mysli (Moskovskie vstrechi po istorii psihologii)” (2006, 2009, 2016) // Istorija rossijskoj psihologii v licah: Dajdzhest. 2017. № 4. S. 25–37 [Cherdakova M.M., Kostrigin A.A. Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in the Proceedings of the Conferences “History of Russian and World Psychological Thought (Moscow Meetings on the History of Psychology)” (2006, 2009, 2016) // History of Russian Psychology in Persons: Digest. 2017. № 4. P. 25–37.]

15. Burman J.T. What Is History of Psychology? Network Analysis of Journal Citation Reports, 2009–2015 // SAGE Open. 2018. Vol. 8. Is. 1.

16. Coleman S.R., Cola P., Webster S. Characteristics of the System of Production of History-Of-Psychology Literature, 1975–1986 // International Journal of Psychology. 1992. Vol. 27. Is. 1. Р. 110–124.

17. Flis I. Digital humanities as the Historian’s Trojan Horse: Response to commentary in the special section on digital history // History of Psychology. 2018. Vol. 21. Is. 4. Р. 380–383.

18. Green C.D. A digital future for the history of psychology? // History of Psychology. 2018. Vol. 19. Is. 3. Р. 209–219.

19. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005. Vol. 102. Is. 46. Р. 16569–16572.

20. Krampen G. Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? // Scientometrics. 2016. Vol. 106. Is. 3. Р. 1217–1238.

21. Preckel F., Krampen G. Development and main topics of psychological giftedness research: A scientometric study of publications between 1980 and 2014 // Psychologische Rundschau. 2016. Vol. 67. Is. 1. Р. 1–14.

22. Rushton J.P. A Scientometric appreciation of H.J. Eysenk’s contributions to psychology // Personality and Individual Differences. 2001. Vol. 31. Is. 1. Р. 17–39.

23. Serova O. Scientific metric methods in historical psychological study // International Journal of Psychology. 2000. Vol. 35. Is. 3–4. P. 50.