Clance impostor phenomenon scale: psychometric properties of russian version

 
PIIS020595920013343-3-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920013343-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Perm, Perm, Studencheskaya Street, 38, Russia
Occupation: Professor of the Department of General Psychology
Affiliation: Institute of Social Sciences RANEPA
Address: Perm, Gagarina Boulevard, 10, Russia
Occupation: Professor, Department of Foreign Languages
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Perm, Studencheskaya Street, 38, Russia
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 42 Issue 1
Pages132-142
Abstract

Impostor phenomenon is a personality disposition characterized by underestimating abilities, competences and achievements; inability to accept external approval and exaggeration of external accomplishments; attribution of success to external factors. Having been found in organizational and academic settings, impostor phenomenon prevents success for ethnic and professional groups. Impostor phenomenon is negatively correlated with self-esteem and positively ― with negative emotions. The purpose of this research is to test Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS) validity for the Russian sample. The scale includes 20 statements in 3 subscales: Fake, Discount and Luck. The participants were 370 students. To test external validity the study employed Stolin’s and Pantileev’s Self-Attitude Scale and the Portrait Big Five Questionnaire. CFA confirmed one-factor structure for CIPS. Imposter Phenomenon Scale showed a good reliability (α = 0.89). CIPS validity is confirmed by negative correlations with self-attitude, four personality traits and positive correlations with internal conflict, self-incrimination and neuroticism. CIPS shows one-factor structure, possesses good reliability and convergent validity, as a result, can be applied for a wide range of research areas and practical issues.

KeywordsImpostor Phenomenon, psychodiagnosis, validity, reliability, self-attitude, personality
AcknowledgmentThe study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research within the framework of scientific project № 20-013-00743
Received10.01.2021
Publication date20.01.2021
Number of characters26279
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 31, views: 2998

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bulgakova L.I. “Sindrom samozvantsa”: istoriya vozniknoveniya termina, osnovnye kontseptsii i ikh transformatsiya. Psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya sem’i. 2018. No 3. P. 30–37. (in Russian)

2. Egorova M.S., Parshikova O.V. Psikhometricheskie kharakteristiki Korotkogo portretnogo oprosnika Bol’shoy pyaterki (B5-10). Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. V. 9. No 45. P. 9 (in Russian)

3. Pantileev S.R., Stolin V.V. Metodika issledovaniya samootnosheniya. Moscow: Smysl, 1993. (in Russian)

4. Stolin V.V. Samosoznanie lichnosti. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1983. (in Russian)

5. Arena D.M., Page N.E. The imposter phenomenon in the clinical nurse specialist role. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1992. V. 24. № 2. P. 121–126.

6. Bernard N.S., Dollinger S.J., Ramaniah N.V. Applying the big five personality factors to the impostor phenomenon. Journal of personality assessment. 2002. V. 78. № 2. P. 321–333.

7. Bernard D., Neblett E. A culturally informed model of the development of the impostor phenomenon among African American youth. Adolescent Research Review. 2018. V. 3. №. 3. P. 279–300.

8. Bernat E. Towards a pedagogy of empowerment: The case of “impostor syndrome” among pre-service non-native speaker teachers in TESOL. English language teacher education and development. 2008. V. 11. № 1. P. 1–8.

9. Brauer K., Wolf A. Validation of the German-language Clance impostor phenomenon scale (GCIPS). Personality and Individual Differences. 2016. V. 102. P. 153–158.

10. Brislin R.W. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology. 1970. V. 1. № 3. P. 185–216.

11. Chae J.H., Piedmont R.L., Estadt B.K., Wicks R.J. Personological evaluation of Clance's Imposter Phenomenon Scale in a Korean sample. Journal of personality assessment. 1995. V. 65. № 3. P. 468–485.

12. Chrisman S.M., Pieper W.A., Clance P.R., Holland C.L., Glickauf-Hughes C. Validation of the Clance imposter phenomenon scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1995. V. 65. № 3. P. 456–467.

13. Clance P.R. The impostor phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Atlanta, GA: Peachtree Publishers, 1985.

14. Clance P.R., Imes S.A. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. 1978. V. 15. № 3. P. 241.

15. Clark M., Vardeman K.K., Barba S.E. Perceived inadequacy: A study of the imposter phenomenon among college and research librarians. College & Research Libraries. 2014. V. 75. № 3. P. 255–271.

16. Cokley K., Awad G., Smith L., Jackson S., Awosogba O., Hurst A., Roberts D. The roles of gender stigma consciousness, impostor phenomenon and academic self-concept in the academic outcomes of women and men. Sex Roles. 2015. V. 73. № 9-10. P. 414–426.

17. French B.F., Ullrich-French S.C., Follman D. The psychometric properties of the Clance Impostor Scale. Personality and Individual Differences. 2008. V. 44. № 5. P. 1270–1278.

18. Harvey J.C. The Impostor Phenomenon and achievement: A failure to internalize success (Doctoral Dissertation, Temple University, 1981).

19. Harvey J.C., Katz, C. If I'm so successful, why do I feel like a fake? The impostor phenomenon. New York: Pocket Books, 1986.

20. Kolligian Jr J., Sternberg R.J. Perceived Fraudulence in Young Adults: Is There an “Imposter Syndrome”?. Journal of personality assessment. 1991. V. 56. № 2. P. 308–326.

21. Lane J.A. The imposter phenomenon among emerging adults transitioning into professional life: Developing a grounded theory. Adultspan Journal. 2015. V. 14. № 2. P. 114–128.

22. Leary M.R., Patton K.M., Orlando A.E., Wagoner Funk W. The impostor phenomenon: Self-perceptions, reflected appraisals, and interpersonal strategies. Journal of personality. 2000. V. 68. № 4. P. 725–756.

23. Leonhardt M., Bechtoldt M.N., Rohrmann S. All impostors aren’t alike–differentiating the impostor phenomenon. Frontiers in psychology. 2017. V. 8. P. 1505.

24. Mak K.K., Kleitman S., Abbott M.J. Impostor phenomenon measurement scales: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology. 2019. V. 10. P. 1–15.

25. McElwee R.O.B., Yurak T.J. Feeling versus acting like an impostor: Real feelings of fraudulence or self-presentation?. Individual Differences Research. 2007. V. 5. № 3. P. 201–221.

26. McGregor L.N., Gee D.E., Posey K.E. I feel like a fraud and it depresses me: The relation between the imposter phenomenon and depression. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 2008. V. 36. № 1. P. 43–48.

27. Neureiter M., Traut-Mattausch E. An inner barrier to career development: Preconditions of the impostor phenomenon and consequences for career development. Frontiers in psychology. 2016. V. 7. P. 48.

28. Parkman A. The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 2016. V. 16. № 1. P. 51–60.

29. Rohrmann S., Bechtoldt M.N., Leonhardt M. Validation of the impostor phenomenon among managers. Frontiers in psychology. 2016. V. 7. P. 821.

30. Ross S.R., Stewart J., Mugge M., Fultz B. The imposter phenomenon, achievement dispositions, and the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001. V. 31. № 8. P. 1347–1355.

31. Schubert N., Bowker A. Examining the impostor phenomenon in relation to self-esteem level and self-esteem instability. Current Psychology. 2017. P. 1–7.

32. Simon M., Choi Y.J. Using factor analysis to validate the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale in sample of science, technology, engineering and mathematics doctoral students. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018. V. 121. P. 173–175.

33. Sonnak C., Towell T. The impostor phenomenon in British university students: Relationships between self-esteem, mental health, parental rearing style and socioeconomic status. Personality and individual differences. 2001. V. 31. № 6. P. 863–874.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up