Institutional factors in the development of the domestic history of psychology (on the material of the RSCI)

 
PIIS020595920013341-1-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920013341-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Organization of Continuing Education of the Faculty of Continuing Professional Education
Affiliation: Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia
Address: Moscow, Ostrovityanova str., 1,
Occupation: Head of the Department of General Psychology and the History of Psychology
Affiliation: Moscow University for the Humanities
Address: Yunosti str., 5
Occupation: Professor, Scientific Adviser of Institute of Psychology RAS
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Yaroslavskaya str., 13, building 1
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 42 Issue 1
Pages111-121
Abstract

The article discusses bibliometric and scientometric indicators of an array of publications on the history of psychology, indexed by the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI). The contribution of historical and psychological articles to formal indicators of the influence of scientific journals is shown. The organizations that make a significant contribution to the total number of historical and psychological publications are identified. The contribution of these organizations to formal indicators of the influence of the branch of the history of psychology as an array of publications indexed at the RSCI is also shown. 

Keywordshistory of psychology, H–index, impact factor, aggregate impact factor
AcknowledgmentThe study is supported by the grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-013-00779
Received10.01.2021
Publication date20.01.2021
Number of characters19246
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1092

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Eliseeva I.N., Olejnik Yu.N. Naukometricheskij analiz kak metod izucheniya sostoyaniya i dinamiki nauchnogo napravleniya (na primere ispol`zovaniya kategorii “individual`nost`” v nazvaniyax dissertacionny`x issledovanij 1992–2018 gg.). Metodologiya, teoriya, istoriya psixologii lichnosti. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Nikitina, N.E. Xarlamenkova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psixologii RAN”, 2019. P. 218–233. (in Russian)

2. Zuev K.B., Nestik T.A. Bibliometricheskij analiz osnovny`x pokazatelej publikacij po teme “Psixologiya” v naukometricheskoj baze Web of Science Core Collection. Fundamental`ny`e i prikladny`e issledovaniya sovremennoj psixologii. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Kol`czova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psixologii RAN”, 2017. P. 1822–1829. (in Russian)

3. Zuev K.B., Nestik T.A. Bibliometricheskij analiz razvitiya osnovny`x napravlenij psixologicheskix issledovanij (po danny`m WoS i statistike poiskovy`x zaprosov Google). Psixologicheskoe znanie: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy` razvitiya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psixologii RAN”, 2018. P. 671–697. (in Russian)

4. Koly`shkina A.V., Olejnik Yu.N. Vozmozhnosti ispol`zovaniya metoda indeksa citirovaniya v istoriko-psixologicheskom issledovanii. Sovremennaya psixologiya: sostoyanie i perspektivy` issledovanij. Ch. 4. Metodologicheskie problemy` istoriko-psixologicheskogo issledovaniya: materialy` yubilejnoj nauchnoj konferencii IP RAN, 29–29 yanvarya 2002 g.. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psixologii RAN”, 2002. P. 288–298. (in Russian)

5. Kostrigin A.A., Xusyainov T.M. Imya L.S. Vy`gotskogo kak ob``ekt Digital Humanities. Istoriya psixologii v liczax: Dajdzhest. 2016. № 6. P. 44–66. (in Russian)

6. Kostrigin A.A., Xusyainov T.M. Digital Humanities v istorii psixologii (na primere familii V.M. Bextereva). Cifrovoj ucheny`j: laboratoriya filosofa. 2018. V. 1. № 1. P. 160–179. (in Russian)

7. Kostrigin A.A., Mazina K.N. Istoki i aktual`nost` vozniknoveniya kognitivnoj psixologii (Digital Humanities v istorii psixologii). Istoriya psixologii v liczax: Dajdzhest. 2018. № 3. P. 19–30. (in Russian)

8. Kostrigin A.A., Nekrasova A.S., Demeshhuk E.L. Cifrovaya istoriya psixologii: ispol`zovanie ponyatiya “bessoznatel`noe” v russkoyazy`chnoj literature. Istoriya psixologii v liczax: Dajdzhest. 2018. № 3. P. 31–41. (in Russian)

9. Mazilov V.A., Baty`rshina A.R. Vozmozhnosti naukometricheskogo podxoda v istoriko-psixologicheskom issledovanii (na primere problemy` voli v otechestvennoj psixologii). Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik. 2016. № 36. P. 63–74. (in Russian)

10. Morgun A.N. Naukometricheskoe prostranstvo issledovanij po istorii psixologii: prirosty` i izderzhki. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2019. № 2. P. 136–146. (in Russian)

11. Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Analiz bol`shix danny`x v psixologii i sociogumanitarny`x naukax: perspektivny`e napravleniya issledovanij. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. №6. P. 5–17. (in Russian)

12. Pislyakov V.V. Bibliometricheskie indikatory` v resursax Thomson Reuters. Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatory` razvitiya nauki i texnologii. Ed. M. A. Akoev. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural`skogo universiteta, 2014. P. 75–109. (in Russian)

13. Pislyakov V.V. Metody` ocenki znaniya po pokazatelyam citirovaniya. Sociologicheskij zhurnal. 2007. № 1. P. 128–140. (in Russian)

14. Cherdakova M.M., Kostrigin A.A. Bibliometricheskij analiz publikacij v sbornikax materialov konferencij “Istoriya otechestvennoj i mirovoj psixologicheskoj my`sli (Moskovskie vstrechi po istorii psixologii)” (2006, 2009, 2016). Istoriya rossijskoj psixologii v liczax: Dajdzhest. 2017. № 4. P. 25–37. (in Russian)

15. Burman J.T. What Is History of Psychology? Network Analysis of Journal Citation Reports, 2009–2015. SAGE Open. 2018. V. 8. Issue 1.

16. Coleman S.R., Cola P., Webster S. Characteristics of the System of Production of History-Of-Psychology Literature, 1975–1986. International Journal of Psychology. 1992. V. 27. Issue 1. P. 110–124.

17. Flis I. Digital humanities as the Historian's Trojan Horse: Response to commentary in the special section on digital history. History of Psychology. 2018. V. 21. Issue 4. P. 380–383.

18. Green C.D. A digital future for the history of psychology?. History of Psychology. 2018. V. 19. Issue 3. P. 209–219.

19. Hirsch J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005. V. 102. Issue 46. P. 16569–16572.

20. Krampen G. Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?. Scientometrics. 2016. V. 106. Issue 3. P. 1217–1238.

21. Preckel F., Krampen G. Development and main topics of psychological giftedness research: A scientometric study of publications between 1980 and 2014. Psychologische Rundschau. 2016. V. 67. Issue 1. P. 1–14.

22. Rushton J.P. A Scientometric appreciation of H. J. Eysenk’s contributions to psychology. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001. V. 31. Issue 1. P. 17–39.

23. Serova O. Scientific metric methods in historical psychological study. International Journal of Psychology. 2000. V. 35. Issue 3–4. P. 50.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up