Все
 
 
 


Психологический анализ политических ориентаций. Часть II. Предикторы и последствия политических взглядов
 
Код статьиS020595920012575-8-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920012575-8
Тип публикации Статья
Статус публикации Опубликовано
Авторы
Гулевич О. А. 
Должность: Профессор департамента психологии НИУ ВШЭ
Аффилиация: Национальный исследовательский университет Высшая школа экономики
Адрес: Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 20
Название журналаПсихологический журнал
ВыпускТом 42 № 1
Страницы46-55
Аннотация

В аналитическом обзоре рассматриваются особенности психологических исследований, посвященных политическим ориентациям ― распространенным в обществе системам представлений о правильном устройстве общества и путях его достижения. Отмечается, что североамериканские и европейские психологи проводят различие между двумя политическими ориентациями ― консерватизмом и либерализмом. Обзор состоит из двух частей. В первой части анализируются вопросы, связанные со структурой, методами измерения и общими проблемами изучения политических ориентаций; во второй части описываются предикторы и последствия политических ориентаций. Вторая часть состоит из четырех разделов. В первом разделе рассматривается связь относительно стабильных психологических особенностей (личностных черт, характеристик когнитивной сферы, ценностей, моральных принципов, правого авторитаризма и ориентации на социальное доминирование) с политическими ориентациями. Во втором разделе анализируется воздействие угрозы на политическую ориентацию, описываются две теории, объясняющие это воздействие. В третьем разделе описываются взгляды консерваторов и либералов на устройство общества: их представления о личных отношениях, экономике, внутренней и внешней политике, отношение к природе. В четвертом разделе описываются ограничения проведенных исследований.

Ключевые словаПолитические ориентации, ценности, моральные основания, правый авторитаризм, ориентация на социальное доминирование, предрассудки, электоральные предпочтения, экологические взгляды.
Источник финансированияИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 19-113-50282.
Получено13.11.2020
Дата публикации20.01.2021
Кол-во символов27397
Цитировать  
100 руб.
При оформлении подписки на статью или выпуск пользователь получает возможность скачать PDF, оценить публикацию и связаться с автором. Для оформления подписки требуется авторизация.

Оператором распространения коммерческих препринтов является ООО «Интеграция: ОН»

Всего подписок: 3, всего просмотров: 1149

Оценка читателей: голосов 0 

1. Allen R.S., Castano E., Allen P.D. Conservatism and concern for the environment // Quarterly Journal of Ideology. 2017. V. 30. P. 1–25.
2. Aspelund A., Lindeman M., Verkasalo M. Political conservatism and left–right orientation in 28 Eastern and Western European countries // Political Psychology. 2013. V. 34. P. 409–417.
3. Barnett M.D., Archuleta W.P., Cantu C. Politics, concern for future generations, and the environment: Generativity mediates political conservatism and environmental attitudes // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2019. V. 49. P. 647–654.
4. Binning K.R. “It’s us against the world”: How distrust in Americans versus people-in-general shapes competitive foreign policy preferences // Political Psychology. 2017. V. 28. P. 779–799.
5. Burke B.L., Kosloff S., Landau M.J. Death goes to the polls: A meta-analysis of mortality salience effects on political attitudes // Political Psychology. 2013. V. 34. P. 183–200.
6. Caprara G.V., Vecchione M. Personality approaches to political behavior // The Oxford handbook of political psychology / Ed. by L. Huddy, D.O. Sears, J.S. Levy. Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 23–58.
7. Carl N. Cognitive ability and political beliefs in the United States // Personality and Individual Differences. 2015. V. 83. P. 245–248.
8. Carney D.R., Jost J.T., Gosling S.D., Potter J. The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind // Political Psychology. 2008. V. 29. P. 807–840.
9. Crawford J.T., Pilanski J.M. Political intolerance, right and left // Political Psychology. 2014. V. 35. P. 841–851.
10. Crowson H.M. Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism // The Journal of Psychology. 2009. V. 143. P. 449–463.
11. Crowson H.M., Thoma S.J., Hestevold N. Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism? // The Journal of Social Psychology. 2005. V. 145. P. 571–592.
12. Czarnek G., Szwed P., Kossowska M. Right- and left-wing prejudice toward dissimilar groups in cultural and economic domains // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2019. V. 49. P. 807–823.
13. Donaldson C.D., Handren L.M., Lac A. Applying multilevel modeling to understand individual and cross-cultural variations in attitudes toward homosexual people across 28 European countries // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2017. V. 48. P. 93–112.
14. Duckitt J. A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2001. V. 33. P. 41–113.
15. Elad-Strenger J., Proch J., Kessler T. Is disgust a “conservative” emotion? // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2020. V. 46. № 6. P. 896–912.
16. Erhart R. A cross-national examination of prejudice toward immigrants: The role of education and political ideology // Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research. 2016. V. 8. P. 279–289.
17. Federico C.M., Ergun D., Hunt C. Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2014. V. 17. P. 524–541.
18. Feldman S. Political ideology // The Oxford handbook of political psychology / Ed. by L. Huddy D.O. Sears, J. S. Levy. Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 591–626.
19. Feygina I., Jost J.T., Goldsmith R.E. System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change” // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2010. V. 36. P. 326–338.
20. Friese M., Fishman S., Beatson R., Sauerwein K., Rip B. Whose fault is it anyway? Political orientation, attributions of responsibility, and support for the war in Iraq // Social Justice Research. 2009. V. 22. P. 280–297.
21. Graham J., Haidt J., Nosek B.A. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. V. 96. P. 1029–1046.
22. Harnish R.J., Bridges K.R., Gump J.T. Predicting economic, social, and foreign policy conservatism // Current Psychology. 2018. V. 37. P. 668–679.
23. Harper C.A., Hogue T.E. The role of intuitive moral foundations in Britain's vote on EU membership // Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. 2019. V. 29. P. 90–103.
24. Hodson G., Earle M. Conservatism predicts lapses from vegetarian/vegan diets to meat consumption (through lower social justice concerns and social support) // Appetite. 2018. V. 120. P. 75–81.
25. Hodson G., MacInnis C.C. Can left-right differences in abortion support be explained by sexism? // Personality and Individual Differences. 2017. V. 104. P. 118–121.
26. Hoffarth M.R., Azevedo F., Jost J.T. Political conservatism and the exploitation of nonhuman animals: An application of system justification theory // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2019. V. 22. P. 858–878.
27. Jost J.T. “Elective affinities”: On the psychological bases of left–right differences // Psychological Inquiry. 2009. V. 20. P. 129–141.
28. Jost J.T. Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology // Political Psychology. 2017. V. 38. P. 167–208.
29. Jost J.T. The end of the end of ideology // American Psychology. 2006. V. 61. P. 651–670.
30. Jost J.T., Federico C.M., Napie J.L. Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities // Annual Review of Psychology. 2009. V. 60. P. 307–337.
31. Jost J.T., Glaser J., Kruglanski A.W., Sulloway F. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition // Psychological Bulletin. 2003. V. 129. P. 339–375.
32. Jost J.T., Napier J.L., Thorisdottir H., Gosling S.D., Palfai T.P., Ostafin B. Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2007. V. 33. P. 989–1007.
33. Jost J.T., Nosek B.A., Gosling S.D. Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology // Perspective on Psychological Science. 2008. V. 3. P. 126–136.
34. Jost J.T., Sterling J., Stern C. Getting closure on conservatism, or the politics of epistemic and existential motivation // The motivation-cognition interface: From the lab to the real world: A Festschrift in honor of Arie W. Kruglanski / Ed. by C.Kopetz, A.Fishbach. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 2017. P. 56–87.
35. Jost J.T., Stern C., Rule N.O., Sterling J. The politics of fear: Is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? // Social Cognition. 2017. V. 35. P. 324–353.
36. Lönnqvist J.-E., Kivikangas M. Economic attitudes, social attitudes and their psychological underpinnings. A study of the Finnish political elite // Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. V. 10. Article 602.
37. Ludeke S.G., Rasmussen S.H.R. Different political systems suppress or facilitate the impact of intelligence on how you vote: A comparison of the U.S. and Denmark // Intelligence. 2018. V. 70. P. 1–6.
38. Malka A., Soto C.J. The conflicting influences of religiosity on attitude toward torture // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2011. V. 37. P. 1091–1103.
39. Malka A., Soto C.J., Inzlicht M., Lelkes Y. Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2014. V. 106. P. 1031–1051.
40. McAdams D.P., Hanek K.J., Dadabo J.G. Themes of self-regulation and self-exploration in the life stories of religious American conservatives and liberals // Political Psychology. 2013. V. 34. P. 201–219.
41. Mikołajczak G., Becker J.C. What is (un)fair? Political ideology and collective action // Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 2019. V. 7. P. 810–829.
42. Morgan G.S., Mullen E., Skitka L.J. When values and attributions collide: Liberals' and conservatives' values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2010. V. 36. P. 1241–1254.
43. Panno A., Carrus G., Brizi A., Maricchiolo F., Giacomantonio M., Mannetti L. Need for cognitive closure and political ideology: Predicting pro-environmental preferences and behavior // Social Psychology. 2018. V. 49. P. 103–112.
44. Pfeiler T.M., Egloff B. Examining the “Veggie” personality: Results from a representative German sample // Appetite. 2018. V.120. P. 246–255.
45. Prusaczyk E., Hodson G. Left-right differences in abortion policy support in America: Clarifying the role of sex and sexism in a nationally representative 2016 sample // Personality and Individual Differences. 2018. V. 127. P. 22–25.
46. Prusaczyk E., Hodson G. The roles of political conservatism and binary gender beliefs in predicting prejudices toward gay men and people who are transgender // Sex Roles. 2020. V. 82. P. 438–446.
47. Pyszczynski T. Terror management of fear, hate, political conflict, and political violence: A review // TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology. 2013. V. 20. P. 313–326.
48. Rothwell V., Hodson G., Prusaczyk E. Why Pillory Hillary? Testing the endemic sexism hypothesis regarding the 2016 U.S. election // Personality and Individual Differences. 2019. V. 138. P. 106–108.
49. Rutjens B.T., Sutton R.M., van der Lee R. Not all skepticism is equal: Exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2018. V. 44. P. 384–405.
50. Saribay S.A., Yilmaz O. Analytic cognitive style and cognitive ability differentially predict religiosity and social conservatism // Personality and Individual Differences. 2017. V. 114. P. 24–29.
51. Sibley C.G., Osborne D., Duckitt J. Personality and political orientation: Meta-analysis and test of a Threat-Constraint Model // Journal of Research in Personality. 2012. V. 46. P. 664–677.
52. Stewart B.D., Gulzaib F., Morris D.S.M. Bridging political divides: Perceived threat and uncertainty avoidance help explain the relationship between political ideology and immigrant attitudes within diverse intergroup contexts // Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. V. 10. P. Article 1236.
53. Van de Vyver J., Leite A.C., Abrams D., Palmer S.B. Brexit or Bremain? A person and social analysis of voting decisions in the EU referendum // Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. 2018. V. 28. P. 65–79.
54. Wilson M.S., Sibley C.G. Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects on political conservatism // Political Psychology. 2013. V. 34. P. 277–284.
55. Yilmaz O., Saribay S.A. The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used // Judgment and Decision Making. 2017. V. 12. P. 140–147.
56. Zhang J., Nelson M.R., Mao E. Beyond de Tocqueville: The roles of vertical and horizontal individualism and conservatism in the 2004 U.S. presidential election // Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2009. V. 19. P. 197–214.

Система Orphus

Загрузка...
Вверх